| Replies
|
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 3:05 pm on Dec. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from emo sux69 at 2:58 pm on Dec. 19, 2008
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 6:03 am on Dec. 20, 2008
Ford is one of the few if only of the Big 3 to offer MANUAL transmissions in nearly all of their cars. So you fail there. Then you fail yet again with the hypocrisy of the fact you drive a Ford product. But I suppose you didn't know Ford owned Mazda. Soft suspension? What? This isn't 1977 dumb ass.
But you should know that Americas distaste for shifting gears is high, so having manual available on most of there cars isn't going to get them much profit. The smart thing Ford does is make there sports cars like Mustang as cheap as possible by removing key features such as a modern suspension and cheap 5 speed gearboxes making the building costs go right down and selling them for much cheaper then there much more highly equipped rivals making there sales high. 
Fusion comes with a six speed manual or six speed automatic. The manual is only available on the bargain-basement four cylinder S. The six speed automatics are standard on all other models, engines, and AWD equipped cars. In my opinion that is the smarter move. Say you are one of the few Americans who require a manual, you sure as fuck aren't going to be buying a GM or Toyota product. Ford offers an engine and transmission for, literally, everyone. |
|
|
emo sux69
|
Posted at 2:58 pm on Dec. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 6:03 am on Dec. 20, 2008
Ford is one of the few if only of the Big 3 to offer MANUAL transmissions in nearly all of their cars. So you fail there. Then you fail yet again with the hypocrisy of the fact you drive a Ford product. But I suppose you didn't know Ford owned Mazda. Soft suspension? What? This isn't 1977 dumb ass.
But you should know that Americas distaste for shifting gears is high, so having manual available on most of there cars isn't going to get them much profit. The smart thing Ford does is make there sports cars like Mustang as cheap as possible by removing key features such as a modern suspension and cheap 5 speed gearboxes making the building costs go right down and selling them for much cheaper then there much more highly equipped rivals making there sales high. |
|
|
IMPALA
|
Posted at 11:19 am on Dec. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from soldierofjustice3 at 10:06 am on Dec. 19, 2008
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 9:11 pm on Dec. 18, 2008
Not to mention it retains that fun driving factor Ford has always had over the competitors. 
Fun factor in driving slush box's with overly soft suspension and numb handling? Fail. 
god shut the fuck up. your goddamn mazda is a ford product you dipshit |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 11:03 am on Dec. 19, 2008 |
| Ford is one of the few if only of the Big 3 to offer MANUAL transmissions in nearly all of their cars. So you fail there. Then you fail yet again with the hypocrisy of the fact you drive a Ford product. But I suppose you didn't know Ford owned Mazda. Soft suspension? What? This isn't 1977 dumb ass. |
|
|
soldierofjustice3
|
Posted at 10:06 am on Dec. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 9:11 pm on Dec. 18, 2008
Not to mention it retains that fun driving factor Ford has always had over the competitors. 
Fun factor in driving slush box's with overly soft suspension and numb handling? Fail. |
|
|
emo sux69
|
Posted at 7:07 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 10:37 am on Dec. 19, 2008
Modern Trend =/= COTY. Every fuckin magazine has its own "car of the year" awards, this is the most prestigious not being just a group of car magazine editors picking their favorite road tested car. So, no, GT-R is not. It wasn't even in the finalists. 
It could;t be anyway sports cars can't win in these type of awards. and i find it funny that two diesels have made it to the final and yet there like the only foreign diesels in America. |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 3:37 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
| Modern Trend =/= COTY. Every fuckin magazine has its own "car of the year" awards, this is the most prestigious not being just a group of car magazine editors picking their favorite road tested car. So, no, GT-R is not. It wasn't even in the finalists. |
|
|
ScoobyDoo82
|
Posted at 2:39 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
| Um? The Nissan GT-R is the COTY. |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 12:41 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
| The xB was a success, and the Flex is technically superior in every possible way sooo. |
|
|
espresso8097
|
Posted at 12:18 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 2:11 pm on Dec. 18, 2008
Quote: from Baron Samedi at 12:05 pm on Dec. 18, 2008
Ford Flex? Are they blind? That thing is hideous. 
I can only assume its because some people say it is hideous. Kudos to Ford for not making a crossover that looks like every other fucking fat ass crossover on the market. It looks different, its a love it or hate it design. In addition to the looks its also innovative, the safest crossover money can buy, and its build quality is on-par with the best. Not to mention it retains that fun driving factor Ford has always had over the competitors. 
Looks like a Scion xb to me, not good. Overall it is a decent car, but still looks hideous. |
|
|
Baron Samedi
|
Posted at 12:14 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 1:11 pm on Dec. 18, 2008
Quote: from Baron Samedi at 12:05 pm on Dec. 18, 2008
Ford Flex? Are they blind? That thing is hideous. 
I can only assume its because some people say it is hideous. Kudos to Ford for not making a crossover that looks like every other fucking fat ass crossover on the market. It looks different, its a love it or hate it design. In addition to the looks its also innovative, the safest crossover money can buy, and its build quality is on-par with the best. Not to mention it retains that fun driving factor Ford has always had over the competitors. 
So it's like a fat chick... Fun to ride, but when you take a step back and look at what you've done it sickens you to your very core. |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 12:11 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
Quote: from Baron Samedi at 12:05 pm on Dec. 18, 2008
Ford Flex? Are they blind? That thing is hideous. 
I can only assume its because some people say it is hideous. Kudos to Ford for not making a crossover that looks like every other fucking fat ass crossover on the market. It looks different, its a love it or hate it design. In addition to the looks its also innovative, the safest crossover money can buy, and its build quality is on-par with the best. Not to mention it retains that fun driving factor Ford has always had over the competitors. |
|
|
Baron Samedi
|
Posted at 12:05 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
| Ford Flex? Are they blind? That thing is hideous. |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 12:05 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
Quote: from h a t t at 12:03 pm on Dec. 18, 2008
if they aren't electric or like 2000 miles to the gallon then who gives a fuck
I dunno. Thousands of car enthusiasts, millions of people who work in/around the auto industry who's jobs are at stake, it does kind of pertain to whats been going on around the Detroit Big Three. You know, the whole bail out thing. |
|
|
h a t t
|
Posted at 12:03 pm on Dec. 18, 2008 |
| if they aren't electric or like 2000 miles to the gallon then who gives a fuck |
|
|
Most recent 15 of 15 previous replies displayed. |