Adding Reply Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic British vs. American Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post Reefer Posted at 12:26 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 Okay I have heard some people say that the British army was better to join then the American because they give better training and etc. I want your opinions and don't just say your country because you live in it. Honestly decide which one you think is better,

Replies ManicD Posted at 6:01 pm on Aug. 9, 2008 Quote: from Takinam at 2:59 am on Aug. 7, 2008 America has a population of 300 million and Britain, a population of 50 million. You do the math. America would rape Britain unless Britain pulls out the nukes. hitlar commanded many many more men than the British...we kicked his ass numbers dont count when we have intelligence on our side. Our soldiers are better trained, we are an island and therefore its hard to get large amounts of troops onto our land to create a attack base. ...and we have the nukes Takinam Posted at 6:59 pm on Aug. 6, 2008 America has a population of 300 million and Britain, a population of 50 million. You do the math. America would rape Britain unless Britain pulls out the nukes. Fauna Posted at 5:11 pm on Aug. 6, 2008 Quote: from rijames99 at 1:10 am on Aug. 7, 2008 What do you mean by hero-worship? Are you referring to the army as a whole, of soldiers individually? both. rijames99 Posted at 5:10 pm on Aug. 6, 2008 Quote: from Fauna at 3:48 pm on Aug. 6, 2008 british, I dislike the hero-worship of the army in the states. What do you mean by hero-worship?  Are you referring to the army as a whole, of soldiers individually? Fauna Posted at 3:48 pm on Aug. 6, 2008 british, I dislike the hero-worship of the army in the states. tkedwn119 Posted at 1:44 pm on Aug. 6, 2008 Israel has the best military in the world JeanClaude Posted at 12:53 pm on Aug. 6, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 9:09 am on Aug. 6, 2008 Thats because Iraqi children carry GUNS and BOMBS.... Thus is it really surprising we are cautious of EVERYONE out there So you're saying because a few Iraqi children carry weapons that even unarmed children are subject to being brutally beaten and degraded ManicD Posted at 6:09 am on Aug. 6, 2008 Quote: from JeanClaude at 6:37 am on Aug. 6, 2008 I don't know, I've seen about as many YouTube videos of British soldiers attacking Iraqi children as I have American. ):? Thats because Iraqi children carry GUNS and BOMBS.... Thus is it really surprising we are cautious of EVERYONE out there JeanClaude Posted at 10:37 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 I don't know, I've seen about as many YouTube videos of British soldiers attacking Iraqi children as I have American. ):? ManicD Posted at 2:51 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 Quote: from robdude at 10:27 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 3:51 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 Quote: from robdude at 8:42 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 The Americans are better than the british, better battle tested      no, although it might be just as dangerous, walking down your gun crime infested streets is not battle testing so your streets of chavs are No, our chavs occasionally carry knifes and dont have the braincells to use the correctly so dont pose that much of a danger. the general population has far more intelligence Byble Posted at 2:35 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 America in the 2nd world war didn't get involved in it untill the japs bombed in pearl harbour thing.. but i dunno.. prob british? cos like a few times.. american troops have "accidently" like shot at the english etc in iraq or w.e robdude Posted at 2:27 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 3:51 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 Quote: from robdude at 8:42 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 The Americans are better than the british, better battle tested   no, although it might be just as dangerous, walking down your gun crime infested streets is not battle testing so your streets of chavs are ManicD Posted at 12:51 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 Quote: from robdude at 8:42 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 The Americans are better than the british, better battle tested no, although it might be just as dangerous, walking down your gun crime infested streets is not battle testing robdude Posted at 12:42 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 The Americans are better than the british, better battle tested Seani Posted at 12:39 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 8:36 pm on Aug. 5, 2008 British army have always been better trained, occasionally we fall down on equipping our soldiers correctly but mostly you stand a better chance with British training than american Yes. And I like how you capitilized British but not american Most recent 15 of 29 previous replies displayed.