| Replies
|
|
|
jamesish
|
Posted at 9:41 am on Sep. 15, 2008 |
Quote: from sakurag at 12:18 pm on Sep. 15, 2008
It might not be the FUTURE of science, but it is definately powerful. I have seen liquid nitrogen help the good guy in many futuristic movies. Terminator 2, Demolition Man.. I mean. If we didn't have this stuff, how else would we shatter people? 
Im not sure if the creators of Mortal Kombat really realized what they gave Sub Zero. |
|
|
sakurag
|
Posted at 9:18 am on Sep. 15, 2008 |
| It might not be the FUTURE of science, but it is definately powerful. I have seen liquid nitrogen help the good guy in many futuristic movies. Terminator 2, Demolition Man.. I mean. If we didn't have this stuff, how else would we shatter people? |
|
|
JOZ
|
Posted at 4:54 am on Sep. 15, 2008 |
| all it is is very cold and very cold stuff thats cooler then liquid nirrogen is liquid hydrogen caus its bout the same weight as air xD so its a liquid but it can like float out the top of containers and it is small particles so it can seep through the containers they try 2 hold it in lol |
|
|
nigeltheoutlaw
|
Posted at 8:42 pm on Sep. 14, 2008 |
| It turns bananas to glass. |
|
|
allsmiles
|
Posted at 7:18 pm on Sep. 13, 2008 |
| There are so many branches of science that the possibility of anything being the future of science itself is practically impossible. |
|
|
Frubeling
|
Posted at 10:20 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
Quote: from sadnessness at 6:02 pm on Sep. 13, 2008
well its been around for years and nothings happened with it except it being used to freeze warts and verucas. The real future of science (though it will take time) is carbon nanotubes. Phenominal strength. that, and fusion reactors. Look them up if you dont know what they are. Though they are pretty advanced so it will be years down then line : they are the future 
Don't forget superconductors. The infinite energy of a fusion reactor + the efficiency of superconductors = FUCK YEAH |
|
|
sadnessness
|
Posted at 10:02 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
| well its been around for years and nothings happened with it except it being used to freeze warts and verucas. The real future of science (though it will take time) is carbon nanotubes. Phenominal strength. that, and fusion reactors. Look them up if you dont know what they are. Though they are pretty advanced so it will be years down then line : they are the future |
|
|
Midnight Frost
|
Posted at 10:00 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
| Liquid nitrogen alone cannot be the future of science. |
|
|
MR UNKNOWN
|
Posted at 9:58 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
Quote: from jamesish at 12:53 pm on Sep. 13, 2008
Quote: from lally at 12:52 pm on Sep. 13, 2008
its not the future of science. 
Then what is? 
nano technology |
|
|
chaosdisown
|
Posted at 9:55 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
| im still waiting for everything to run on hydroelectricity. |
|
|
kingduffy
|
Posted at 9:54 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
Quote: from jamesish at 9:53 am on Sep. 13, 2008
Quote: from lally at 12:52 pm on Sep. 13, 2008
its not the future of science. 
Then what is? 
LHC is the fututre assuming it wont destroy us |
|
|
Molfsontan
|
Posted at 9:53 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
| Well, if we can get liquid nitrogen to freeze computer processors we could increase the processing speed of them exponentially. |
|
|
King Kong
|
Posted at 9:53 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
Quote: from marshmellowman at 5:53 pm on Sep. 13, 2008
Not really. It's not all that amazing.
agreed |
|
|
SpM
|
Posted at 9:53 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
| I wasn't aware it had much application beyond cooling. |
|
|
jamesish
|
Posted at 9:53 am on Sep. 13, 2008 |
Quote: from lally at 12:52 pm on Sep. 13, 2008
its not the future of science. 
Then what is? |
|
|
Most recent 15 of 21 previous replies displayed. |