Adding Reply Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic Do you know a REAL pussy move? Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post kidd rune Posted at 9:04 am on Nov. 15, 2008 When you say something you wouldn't say to someones face - then you either: 1. Hang up the phone. 2. Block them on messenger. 3. Block their email. 4. Block their messages. Faggots!

Replies kidd rune Posted at 7:42 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 Isn't he for segragation anyway? That s another form of blocking. No, it isn't. A nation for only Whites isn't any more like segregation than only letting your family and friends into your home as they please - but everyone else as GUESTS. A White nation would exists for only Whites to LIVE in (But not all Whites have to live there) - and nonWhites can visit an do business, but not LIVE there. SAMMYJS99 Posted at 4:37 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 Quote: from medjai at 12:06 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 Dude I would block you just because you are so juvenile and stupid. QFT jakelong Posted at 4:26 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 Quote: from medjai at 9:06 am on Nov. 15, 2008 Dude I would block you just because you are so juvenile and stupid. This. I didn't even bother blocking him but that's agood idea! Although I wonder that would even upset him. Isn't he for segragation anyway? That s another form of blocking.   Shogun villimax Posted at 1:30 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 9:04 am on Nov. 15, 2008 When you say something you wouldn't say to someones face - then you either: 1. Hang up the phone. 2. Block them on messenger. 3. Block their email. 4. Block their messages.   Faggots! I hate when people do that! But just keep right on posting! kidd rune Posted at 12:36 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 My point exactly. If the best allele and gene detection services on offer has a 10% error factor how can you possibley hope to be more accurate by judging extrapolating phenotype to genotype? 1. I didn't say they were. 2. I doubt this is going to happen any time soon. A White Nation would be centered around preservation of White history, culture, genetics, etc. The genetics would be a factor to deal with another day. The Samsoniteman Posted at 10:48 am on Nov. 15, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 6:42 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 AncestrybyDNA even says that they can give you a 10% when you don't have any genetics from one people. My point exactly. If the best allele and gene detection services on offer has a 10% error factor how can you possibley hope to be more accurate by judging extrapolating phenotype to genotype? kidd rune Posted at 10:42 am on Nov. 15, 2008 Genetic testing is the only way to go, I feel. Alleles that we designate as white/important to our culture could then be preserved by ensuring that we only let carriers into our society. The limit could be 95%, say, and anyone failing to meet this alleic similarity will fall out of the white definition. Well, genetic tests of today are inaccurate - and I've looked into this for a good while. AncestrybyDNA even says that they can give you a 10% when you don't have any genetics from one people. And I have heard of them testing you if you're thinking about kids - but not entry. Then, they would have more Whites in the country - and have almost 100% (if not 100%) White children. The Samsoniteman Posted at 10:39 am on Nov. 15, 2008 You're confident it is possible to interpret a genotype from macroscopic phenotype? Genetic testing is the only way to go, I feel. Alleles that we designate as white/important to our culture could then be preserved by ensuring that we only let carriers into our society. The limit could be 95%, say, and anyone failing to meet this alleic similarity will fall out of the white definition. kidd rune Posted at 10:31 am on Nov. 15, 2008 Quote: from The Samsoniteman at 1:29 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 So it's not genetic, just how you act and your macroscopic phenotype? Ancestry is considerably more complex than this, unfortunatly. On this basis huge numbers of undesirables will slip through the net. It has a genetic, cultural, and historical basis. The Samsoniteman Posted at 10:29 am on Nov. 15, 2008 So it's not genetic, just how you act and your macroscopic phenotype? Ancestry is considerably more complex than this, unfortunatly. On this basis huge numbers of undesirables will slip through the net. kidd rune Posted at 10:13 am on Nov. 15, 2008 Good. Some do, of course, but good on you for showing a little restraint. We'll carry on as we are until you discover the genome and culture you want to preserve then we'll talk about methods. Here's the definition in the WNPS: A White person is a human being of solely native European ancestry; or a human being who, if they have non-European antecedents, is nonetheless of a physical and genetic makeup that is within the range typical of people of solely European ancestry; or, the child of two Whites. But the whole "Looks White, acts White, fights White" is a good indication too." There won't be any genetic tests to get into the nation, but you have to be considerably White - and for the survival of your people. Aristocrat Posted at 10:11 am on Nov. 15, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 9:51 am on Nov. 15, 2008 I want Whites to remain alive. How could the white race survive when most of them just have about 1 to 2 or the most 3 kids then no more than that.  I am afraid the white race is going to be extinct. Alright that was exageration but in 50 years they probably might be a minority. The Samsoniteman Posted at 10:08 am on Nov. 15, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 6:03 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 What do you mean by "Our society"? Anything you want it to. There is no certain boundaries or any specific classification that exists, but race DOES exist. Of course it does. And I don't think you understand HOW people want to go about preserving Whites. We won't kick people out or kill and FORCE Whites to have kids or live in a specific country. Good. Some do, of course, but good on you for showing a little restraint. We'll carry on as we are until you discover the genome and culture you want to preserve then we'll talk about methods. kidd rune Posted at 10:03 am on Nov. 15, 2008 It means genetically and culturally defining "white" and then purging our society of everything about it that does not fit into this definition. What do you mean by "Our society"? it's not possible to create a coherent and meaningful genetically-defined race. There is no certain boundaries or any specific classification that exists, but race DOES exist. Sure, there is disagreement on who is White/Black/Caucasoid/Mongoloid but race DOES exist. And I don't think you understand HOW people want to go about preserving Whites. We won't kick people out or kill and FORCE Whites to have kids or live in a specific country. The Samsoniteman Posted at 9:55 am on Nov. 15, 2008 It means genetically and culturally defining "white" and then purging our society of everything about it that does not fit into this definition. Which worries me somewhat, because I ride a bike to uni and I'm fairly certain the wheel is not a "white invention". I'd be forced to walk to uni with my white brothers and sisters and, on Wednesday mornings, attend my medical genetics lectures where we are taught that, genetically speaking, it's not possible to create a coherent and meaningful genetically-defined race. Most recent 15 of 26 previous replies displayed.