Adding Reply Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic eHelp sorting Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post holysaiyan1 Posted at 6:51 pm on Nov. 12, 2007 Sometimes, eHelps get spread out over 2 or 3 pages, which causes older eHelps to be ignored, as they've been bumped from the first page.  If Support Leaders had the ability to sort eHelps by status (new, read, or already answered), that'd solve that problem. Also, sometimes people refer back to previous eHelps, which makes it somewhat hard to see what they're talking about if they didn't include the link.  This is where the "sort by eHelp sender" would come in handy.  As for Anonymous senders, perhaps the system could keep track of which Anonymous's are which, so that the Sort by eHelp Sender wouldn't be broken by Anonymous submissions.

Replies holysaiyan1 Posted at 6:51 pm on Nov. 12, 2007 Sometimes, eHelps get spread out over 2 or 3 pages, which causes older eHelps to be ignored, as they've been bumped from the first page.  If Support Leaders had the ability to sort eHelps by status (new, read, or already answered), that'd solve that problem. Also, sometimes people refer back to previous eHelps, which makes it somewhat hard to see what they're talking about if they didn't include the link.  This is where the "sort by eHelp sender" would come in handy.  As for Anonymous senders, perhaps the system could keep track of which Anonymous's are which, so that the Sort by eHelp Sender wouldn't be broken by Anonymous submissions. All 2 previous replies displayed.