Your thoughts?
My mother has great issues on this topic and i kind of agree with what she says about hospitals. Certainly here in Britain the hospitals have gone down hill, there is no doubt about that. They are dirtier which makes it even more possible for people to get infections and pick up bugs while staying there (MRSA). Now, my mother believes that this is because they abolished the 'matrons' and i have to say she makes a convincing argument.
Intrahospitalarian StaphAu is a 1/300,000 case... You gotta see the hospitals down there in Peru, Bolivia and Argentina... those ARE risky, they don't even have Methicillin for non-resistant genotypes... come on, you're in the first world.
Sorry, I made a mistake, read the next post.... mods, if ya want to remove this, go on, my actual post is the next one.
I know it's not just this one hospital because I was also hospitalized a few times in the states and experienced the same issues.
Anyway back to the original point if you are suffering from a bad illness (that is what hospitals are designed for) then you need to go to hospital there is to much attention on how safe they are incomparison to the past. If someone starts a comparison with 'Back in my day' ignore them :) since time isnt as comparible technology and medicine has improved dramaticly and also alot of illnesses weren't known or curable so people got sent home as a solution those arn't part of the statistics often compared.
As for matrons yes this sounds like a good idea, but hospitals are far to big for one person to police. Bringing cleaning back to the nurses is an option but i dont see a billion pound increase in nurse wages to have enough staff to do the work being on one of the election pieces. Hospitals cost alot its simple as that and if we want our hospitals better we are going to pay more tax.
What kind of a super bug?
MRSA