| Replies
|
|
|
EndLess LoVe
|
Posted at 3:03 pm on Sep. 8, 2008 |
If it were me It would go as; In this paper, I will address J.L. Mackie's premise which suggests that because good cannot exist without evil, God lacks omnipotence and the quality of being wholly-good, as written in his essay "Evil and Omnipotence". |
|
|
Black American Dude
|
Posted at 3:00 pm on Sep. 8, 2008 |
| is this better? In this paper, I will address J.L. Mackie's premise: because good cannot exist without evil God lacks omnipotence and the quality of being wholly-good, in his essay "Evil and Omnipotence." |
|
|
omgnowayyy
|
Posted at 3:00 pm on Sep. 8, 2008 |
| the entire statement kind of looks a mess to me, but the comma should be there. |
|
|
Spastic Fantastic
|
Posted at 2:59 pm on Sep. 8, 2008 |
| Post from this position was omitted due to content violations |
|
|
iBritt
|
Posted at 2:59 pm on Sep. 8, 2008 |
Quote: from Black American Dude at 5:57 pm on Sep. 8, 2008
also is it correct to use "that" after "Evil and Omnipotence"? or should I use "on"
The whole "that" was a bit confusing. It's a little bump in the sentence. But I think your comma is in the right place. |
|
|
hateitandloveit
|
Posted at 2:58 pm on Sep. 8, 2008 |
Quote: from iinsurgent at 5:57 pm on Sep. 8, 2008
Who's**
lol qft |
|
|
Black American Dude
|
Posted at 2:57 pm on Sep. 8, 2008 |
| also is it correct to use "that" after "Evil and Omnipotence"? or should I use "on" |
|
|
iinsurgent
|
Posted at 2:57 pm on Sep. 8, 2008 |
| Who's** |
|
|
All 8 previous replies displayed. |