Quoting Post Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic So, uhm, yeah. Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] Quote: from [m]MiNNiCK[/m] at 9:28 am on Oct. 20, 2008[quote]Quote: from [m]Glory[/m] at 12:27 pm on Oct. 20, 2008[quote]They see it that someone underage many not know the full extent of what they are doing, or are probably being taken advantage of.  It is one measure they are atleast attempting to make to stop pedos.  I have no problem with it. It is called statutory rape, so technically it is rape.  [/quote] I'm not speaking on a pedo basis. I'm speaking about a teenage perspective. [/quote] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post MiNNiCK Posted at 9:24 am on Oct. 20, 2008 I just read this on a website: Sex with an underage person is rape. And I totally don't agree with that. If someone is 22 and someone is 16 or 17, that isn't rape at all...I'm reading that statement as a teenager, not anything else.

Replies MiNNiCK Posted at 10:12 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from DirtyConspiracy at 1:03 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from Minnick at 5:33 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from DirtyConspiracy at 12:30 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 Isn't sex with someone under 13 classed as rape, because they're "too young" to give consent?    If you'd read my post, I wasn't speaking about under 13. Yeah, you were talking about people underage. People under 13 = underage. And since when has 16 and 17 been underage? If a 22 year old were fucking a 16 year old, that 16 year old is considered underage. So you still aren't getting my point. DirtyConspiracy Posted at 10:03 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from Minnick at 5:33 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from DirtyConspiracy at 12:30 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 Isn't sex with someone under 13 classed as rape, because they're "too young" to give consent? If you'd read my post, I wasn't speaking about under 13. Yeah, you were talking about people underage. People under 13 = underage. And since when has 16 and 17 been underage? phoebe19 Posted at 9:34 am on Oct. 20, 2008 rape  2 me is when some 1 says no n the other 1 dose it anyway  thats rape if 1  is 22 n the other is 17 n she n he want 2 do it its not rape MiNNiCK Posted at 9:34 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 12:30 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 It's statutory rape, only because a minor cannot legally consent to sex, therefore there is an absence of consent. Legally the absence of consent is what determines rape, so technically it is, even if really it was consensual sex. That makes sense. I guess I wasn't reading it that way. I'm a bit of a mess mentally right now. But now I understand what it means. Lol. MiNNiCK Posted at 9:33 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from DirtyConspiracy at 12:30 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 Isn't sex with someone under 13 classed as rape, because they're "too young" to give consent? If you'd read my post, I wasn't speaking about under 13. DirtyConspiracy Posted at 9:30 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Isn't sex with someone under 13 classed as rape, because they're "too young" to give consent? marshmellowman Posted at 9:30 am on Oct. 20, 2008 It's statutory rape, only because a minor cannot legally consent to sex, therefore there is an absence of consent. Legally the absence of consent is what determines rape, so technically it is, even if really it was consensual sex. MiNNiCK Posted at 9:28 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from Glory at 12:27 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 They see it that someone underage many not know the full extent of what they are doing, or are probably being taken advantage of.  It is one measure they are atleast attempting to make to stop pedos.  I have no problem with it. It is called statutory rape, so technically it is rape.   I'm not speaking on a pedo basis. I'm speaking about a teenage perspective. kasami5 Posted at 9:28 am on Oct. 20, 2008 that is the truth MiNNiCK Posted at 9:28 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from DefaultTo0 at 12:27 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 That is not rape. Rape is defined as "Force (someone) to have sex against their will". Underage sex is defined as having sex with someone (or being the person) who is under the legal limit for sexual activity. Which is why I wonder why the site was wording it as such. Hmm SpM Posted at 9:27 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Statutory rape, no? Elite Taste Posted at 9:27 am on Oct. 20, 2008 It's the thing about the age of consent. They say that people that are 16 don't know if they want sex or not I'd just say wait 2 more years and then fuck the **it out of them!! LOL jk MiNNiCK Posted at 9:27 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Quote: from Vintorez at 12:26 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 the law says its statutory rape. you don't have to agree with it I understand what you're saying, just stating that "rape" isn't a word that should be used. DefaultTo0 Posted at 9:27 am on Oct. 20, 2008 That is not rape. Rape is defined as "Force (someone) to have sex against their will". Underage sex is defined as having sex with someone (or being the person) who is under the legal limit for sexual activity. RIMHfire Posted at 9:27 am on Oct. 20, 2008 Those pesky teenagers are just stupid. Most recent 15 of 23 previous replies displayed.