| Replies
|
|
|
Total Destruction
|
Posted at 10:06 pm on Aug. 23, 2008 |
| sure |
|
|
sophos
|
Posted at 4:14 am on Aug. 22, 2008 |
| A cherished Christian tradition. |
|
|
Shaknbake
|
Posted at 10:14 pm on Aug. 21, 2008 |
| Yes. Nothing is "not OK" that doesn't cause harm to someone. I don't understand why that's so hard for so many to grasp. |
|
|
exceedinglyrare
|
Posted at 4:35 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
| If it's all actually consensual (read: no coersion, no brainwashing, no threats), everyone is of age and perfectly content with it, and it's not breaking any laws, I don't see the problem with it. |
|
|
abbeyqtpi
|
Posted at 2:03 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
Quote: from SpM at 4:57 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from SpM at 4:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
I don't think so.
Why?
I personally think marriage is for two people only. But it doesn't really matter in my life, anyways.
Well, yes, but why?
I guess I'm not sure.. You win, I fail. |
|
|
justin1990rm
|
Posted at 2:02 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
| people get jealous. we are animals right |
|
|
SpM
|
Posted at 1:57 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from SpM at 4:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
I don't think so.
Why?
I personally think marriage is for two people only. But it doesn't really matter in my life, anyways.
Well, yes, but why? |
|
|
Finger Paint
|
Posted at 1:55 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:51 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from Finger Paint at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D. 
What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other... 
then obviously not everyone wants to be married to each other, and if everyone isn't committed to everyone else then it's not a valid marriage and shouldn't exist 
Well... they're all committed to each other and they all love each other but B, C and D just aren't interested in having a sexual relationship together... the sexual relationship that comes with marriage. |
|
|
shadowofchar
|
Posted at 1:51 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
Quote: from Finger Paint at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D. 
What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other... 
then obviously not everyone wants to be married to each other, and if everyone isn't committed to everyone else then it's not a valid marriage and shouldn't exist |
|
|
abbeyqtpi
|
Posted at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
Quote: from SpM at 4:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
I don't think so.
Why?
I personally think marriage is for two people only. But it doesn't really matter in my life, anyways. |
|
|
Finger Paint
|
Posted at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008
I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D. 
What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other... |
|
|
melissa9009
|
Posted at 1:39 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
| I think if you're a polygamist guy, you're a boss. |
|
|
shadowofchar
|
Posted at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
| I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D. |
|
|
blueelectricguitar
|
Posted at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
I say polygamy is alright as long as everyone knows about it and is happy with it. There are some married couples that have an open relationship. I know that's not quite the same, but if everyone involved is happy with it, why should it matter what anyone else thinks? xxx |
|
|
mnmandme2004
|
Posted at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 |
| its cool but keep your kids away from it... or else the Child protective services will... |
|
|
Most recent 15 of 19 previous replies displayed. |