Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from SpM at 4:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think so. Why? I personally think marriage is for two people only. But it doesn't really matter in my life, anyways. Well, yes, but why?
Quote: from SpM at 4:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think so. Why? I personally think marriage is for two people only. But it doesn't really matter in my life, anyways.
Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think so. Why?
I don't think so.
Quote: from Finger Paint at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D. What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other... then obviously not everyone wants to be married to each other, and if everyone isn't committed to everyone else then it's not a valid marriage and shouldn't exist
Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D. What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other...
I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D.
However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either.
What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D.
What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other...
then obviously not everyone wants to be married to each other, and if everyone isn't committed to everyone else then it's not a valid marriage and shouldn't exist
Well... they're all committed to each other and they all love each other but B, C and D just aren't interested in having a sexual relationship together... the sexual relationship that comes with marriage.