Quoting Post Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic will i go to hell for being gay Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] Quote: from Anonymous at 8:08 pm on Aug. 21, 2008[quote]i am afraid i will. i belive in God, and i pray but some people say if you are gay you go to hell, so does that mean i am already doomed to hell.[/quote] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post Anonymous Posted at 8:08 pm on Aug. 21, 2008 i am afraid i will. i belive in God, and i pray but some people say if you are gay you go to hell, so does that mean i am already doomed to hell.

Replies saf1238 Posted at 7:41 pm on Oct. 9, 2008 Christ said not to judge, and He also said that you should love your neighbor as yourself and to love God above everyone else that all the old laws were explained by that phrase. Christ never adressed homosexuality. He also says that whom ever has faith in me will live forever. As Christians we should follow the New Testement not the Old on which is full of ancient laws that no longer apply to the New Covenant. Further more assuming God is hope, faith, and most importantly Love that His mercy and compassion are infinite He cannot help but love us. God is not a vengeful God. For those people that say God is all good and then accuse gays of going to hell is the real sinner and a hypocryte of the faith. Medicated Smile Posted at 6:40 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 I believe you shall be reincarnated. Forever Angel Posted at 2:35 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from iHaveSum12Love at 4:28 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Personally, I think all the religious crap (God, hell, heaven, etc.) is bull shit (sorry if I offend anyone). So therefore, I would have to say no. If you truly cared whether or not you offend anyone you could have left out the editorializing. Saying you're an atheist would have been a sufficient statement. CrackWaffles Posted at 2:28 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Personally, I think all the religious crap (God, hell, heaven, etc.) is bull shit (sorry if I offend anyone). So therefore, I would have to say no. iconoclast Posted at 1:17 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 i voted yes for the hell of it harhar exceedinglyrare Posted at 5:20 am on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from Nerdandproud at 8:18 am on Aug. 28, 2008 I don't think? Wow thats ironic Obviously not, as you had to change your statement in order for it to actually encompass your moral beliefs. You were so upset over what you perceived to be an "injustice" that you made a blanket statement without thinking and proceeded to make yourself look extremely foolish in your following posts. So no, you don't think. Perhaps you should take your cue from those of us who do think and not let your emotions get in the way of making rational posts. Nerdandproud Posted at 5:18 am on Aug. 28, 2008 I don't think? Wow thats ironic exceedinglyrare Posted at 4:35 am on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from Shaknbake at 12:58 am on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 7:04 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Mmm, I'd say it's less a case of expressing it poorly and more a case of not thinking the implications through. If he meant "two consenting adults" he should have said, "two consenting adults" from the get go. I did say that he formulated [and] expressed it poorly. The formulation bit would've been not saying "consenting adults" from the get go.   As it is, his opinion on what should and shouldn't be a sin is moot. Didn't stop you from arguing the point with him, did it? Largely because he didn't think before he typed, and I was trying to get him to do so. You defeated the purpose. Now he has not learned to think, only to be a Me-Too. Good job. Shaknbake Posted at 9:58 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 7:04 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Mmm, I'd say it's less a case of expressing it poorly and more a case of not thinking the implications through. If he meant "two consenting adults" he should have said, "two consenting adults" from the get go. I did say that he formulated [and] expressed it poorly. The formulation bit would've been not saying "consenting adults" from the get go. As it is, his opinion on what should and shouldn't be a sin is moot. Didn't stop you from arguing the point with him, did it? TRUCUBANDYME305 Posted at 9:16 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Yes you will because God donesn't approve of homosexuality. stickwithit Posted at 7:34 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 yeah you will exceedinglyrare Posted at 7:04 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from Shaknbake at 9:08 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 5:58 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 So you're changing your stance. No, he just formulated and expressed it poorly. Mmm, I'd say it's less a case of expressing it poorly and more a case of not thinking the implications through. If he meant "two consenting adults" he should have said, "two consenting adults" from the get go. As it is, his opinion on what should and shouldn't be a sin is moot. Shaknbake Posted at 6:08 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 5:58 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 So you're changing your stance. No, he just formulated and expressed it poorly. exceedinglyrare Posted at 5:58 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from Nerdandproud at 2:54 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Like I said before, I thought dont have sex with a child is kind of implied, but apparently not So you're changing your stance. Shaknbake Posted at 5:55 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from FutileRhetoric at 5:01 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 I agree, a child the age of 12 classifies as legally retarded and cannot consent to having sex with anyone, a pervert or some curious other 12 year old. It's obviously not the same issue when there's two children involved. Yes, the age difference does make a difference. Most recent 15 of 198 previous replies displayed.