Personally, I think all the religious crap (God, hell, heaven, etc.) is bull shit (sorry if I offend anyone). So therefore, I would have to say no.
harhar
I don't think? Wow thats ironic
Obviously not, as you had to change your statement in order for it to actually encompass your moral beliefs. You were so upset over what you perceived to be an "injustice" that you made a blanket statement without thinking and proceeded to make yourself look extremely foolish in your following posts.
So no, you don't think. Perhaps you should take your cue from those of us who do think and not let your emotions get in the way of making rational posts.
Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 7:04 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Mmm, I'd say it's less a case of expressing it poorly and more a case of not thinking the implications through. If he meant "two consenting adults" he should have said, "two consenting adults" from the get go. I did say that he formulated [and] expressed it poorly. The formulation bit would've been not saying "consenting adults" from the get go. As it is, his opinion on what should and shouldn't be a sin is moot. Didn't stop you from arguing the point with him, did it?
Mmm, I'd say it's less a case of expressing it poorly and more a case of not thinking the implications through. If he meant "two consenting adults" he should have said, "two consenting adults" from the get go.
I did say that he formulated [and] expressed it poorly. The formulation bit would've been not saying "consenting adults" from the get go.
As it is, his opinion on what should and shouldn't be a sin is moot.
Didn't stop you from arguing the point with him, did it?
Largely because he didn't think before he typed, and I was trying to get him to do so. You defeated the purpose. Now he has not learned to think, only to be a Me-Too. Good job.
Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 5:58 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 So you're changing your stance. No, he just formulated and expressed it poorly.
So you're changing your stance.
No, he just formulated and expressed it poorly.
Like I said before, I thought dont have sex with a child is kind of implied, but apparently not
I agree, a child the age of 12 classifies as legally retarded and cannot consent to having sex with anyone, a pervert or some curious other 12 year old.
It's obviously not the same issue when there's two children involved. Yes, the age difference does make a difference.