Susan will start working at home if, but not only if, Peter's mother helps with the rent
Dictionary: M = Peter's mother will help with the rent S = Susan will start working at home
The Oath, I'm reading the page you sent me...
Quote: from Khadgar at 9:12 am on Sep. 19, 2008 I'm no logician, but can't that just be an if/then, since M guarantees S? M → S m doesn't guarantee s though.
I'm no logician, but can't that just be an if/then, since M guarantees S? M → S
M → S
m doesn't guarantee s though.
Sure it did. Susan will start working at home if, but not only if, Peter's mother helps with the rent. The "but not only if" part just says that this is not the only condition which would cause the outcome. So, saying M → S (if M, then S) is correct, but saying that M ≡ S (if and only if M, then S) is not.
Susan will start working at home if, but not only if, Peter's mother helps with the rent.
The "but not only if" part just says that this is not the only condition which would cause the outcome.
So, saying M → S (if M, then S) is correct, but saying that M ≡ S (if and only if M, then S) is not.
Susan will Start working at home if Peter's mom pays the rent
why doesn't M guarantee S? :S
i hate this shit so much :/
"A ⇒ B means if A is true then B is also true; if A is false then nothing is said about B." so yeah, if that cunt doesn't help with the rent, it says nothing about whether or not Susan will work at home
so yeah, if that cunt doesn't help with the rent, it says nothing about whether or not Susan will work at home
Actually, that one looks more correct.
M -> S? If Peter's mother helps with the rent Susan will start working at home. I dunno i mean there's if and only if for a reason, so I assume if means the same as if but not only if. :/
If Peter's mother helps with the rent Susan will start working at home.
I dunno
i mean there's if and only if for a reason, so I assume if means the same as if but not only if. :/
from wiki
"A ⇒ B means if A is true then B is also true; if A is false then nothing is said about B."