| Replies
|
|
|
heatherette
|
Posted at 10:50 am on Dec. 13, 2008 |
| Old enough to pee, old enough for me |
|
|
britishguy
|
Posted at 10:44 am on Dec. 13, 2008 |
| Interestingly though I do know a 15 year old who played in it. But under 14 - I would say you're definitely pushing your luck because of the explicit content. I can't think anyone would be comfortable directing such a young person in some of that stuff. |
|
|
WickedWiccan
|
Posted at 10:43 am on Dec. 13, 2008 |
| Wow I didn't know it was about teens. |
|
|
ReturnOfPatches
|
Posted at 10:42 am on Dec. 13, 2008 |
| One way to find out is just to research the play. If you're familiar with it, then you should know, and have a more informed judgment. And are you really not even 14? |
|
|
Stand Up
|
Posted at 10:41 am on Dec. 13, 2008 |
| Yes it is. Too young doesn't even cut it. I am familiar with the characters, and the play is a mature play. The fact that there's teen characters does not mean that they are played by teenagers. Depends on the director but most would rather have adult actors because it's a play with explicit material; and last time I checked 14 year old's are often not even admitted when they play it. |
|
|
Jokerboy719
|
Posted at 10:40 am on Dec. 13, 2008 |
| Lol, what an interesting name for a monologue |
|
|
Natsy
|
Posted at 10:40 am on Dec. 13, 2008 |
| lolss wut?? ive never heard of that before... |
|
|
All 7 previous replies displayed. |