Quoting Post Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic Charging Website Ads according to PAGE LOADS? Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] Quote: from [m]dreamweaver[/m] at 1:42 pm on April 30, 2008[quote]You guys should seriously just stick with the traditional way of doing things, and that is pay-per-click. I know you can do it through Google and it's easy (I mean, seriously- that's what LW uses here).[/quote] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post blueriptide55 Posted at 12:52 pm on April 30, 2008 We're thinking of charging advertisers who advertise on our FRONT PAGE according to page loads, and not banner clicks. anyone have any info on this and how much to charge?  i cant find info anywhere!

Replies dreamweaver Posted at 12:29 pm on May 1, 2008 My bad then... that's just the way I've always been told about website advertising. bighead1991 Posted at 2:55 am on May 1, 2008 Quote: from dreamweaver at 9:42 pm on April 30, 2008 You guys should seriously just stick with the traditional way of doing things, and that is pay-per-click. I know you can do it through Google and it's easy (I mean, seriously- that's what LW uses here). Google does banners on impressions (page load), so does LiveWire. I don't know what you mean through the traditional way of banners as they do not do that. rand0mguy Posted at 10:29 pm on April 30, 2008 if you realy wanted to you could create a script in javscript or php to access a database with a table of page visits. or there are some websites that can count page views for you. try googling it allsmiles Posted at 3:52 pm on April 30, 2008 It's called pay-per-impression, and it's quite cheap if you think about it. I worked out by spending £30 on google ads that it'd likely be more cost effective to advertise pay-per-impression, on LW ($25 for 64,000 ad views). £30 got me about 17,000 views and 70 hits. That much would get me almost 150,000 views on LW. dreamweaver Posted at 1:42 pm on April 30, 2008 You guys should seriously just stick with the traditional way of doing things, and that is pay-per-click. I know you can do it through Google and it's easy (I mean, seriously- that's what LW uses here). blueriptide55 Posted at 1:01 pm on April 30, 2008 Quote: from dreamweaver at 12:56 pm on April 30, 2008 Doesn't seem very fair... haha i didnt think so either, but my teammate wants it.  he had the idea of advertisers who had a HUGE banner up, so that everytime a user logs onto the site, they automatically see the banner, and so it automatically counts.   dreamweaver Posted at 12:56 pm on April 30, 2008 Doesn't seem very fair... All 7 previous replies displayed.