| Replies
|
|
|
mal630
|
Posted at 2:07 am on Jan. 12, 2004 |
| i'm going to get Adobe Go Live as i've found somewhere were they sell it for $29.99 shame it doesnt come with tech support though, lol |
|
|
vitamin
|
Posted at 12:12 pm on Jan. 3, 2004 |
| ^^ lol ^^ :D ;) :p |
|
|
radium
|
Posted at 9:50 am on Jan. 2, 2004 |
| since it was bumped, perhaps ill comment. :) Using an HTML editor like CuteHTML is what I like. Just changes different tags to different colours and whatnot. making it easier to nav and work in. |
|
|
squirellplayingtag
|
Posted at 8:15 pm on Dec. 29, 2003 |
| Had something to say! |
|
|
vitamin
|
Posted at 11:09 am on Dec. 29, 2003 |
| Why drag this back up!!! |
|
|
chichi2010
|
Posted at 1:49 am on Dec. 29, 2003 |
| ive been using Dreamweaver for about 1 year now... and it works really well for me, much easier yo handle than notepad. (im not that good with HTML) |
|
|
antimac
|
Posted at 8:52 pm on Aug. 27, 2003 |
| MX is crap. DW4 is much better. MX line by macromedia sux uber shit. but i agree notepad rules adobe is #1, esp w/ PS. then flash, then notepad, cuz its so basic. |
|
|
Marx
|
Posted at 3:01 pm on June 10, 2003 |
dreamweaver is handcoding it just has stuff to find syntax errors, and it simplifies some of the more arcane tags.
|
|
|
smiley
|
Posted at 7:03 pm on June 5, 2003 |
Quote: from XZRM at 8:09 pm on May 25, 2003
Eew :( Hand coding = better. 
Me = lazy.
|
|
|
Musicboy9999
|
Posted at 11:40 am on June 1, 2003 |
Dreamweaver is really cool ~ I just started using it
|
|
|
AndreBSD
|
Posted at 12:35 am on May 26, 2003 |
Quote: from XZRM at 5:09 pm on May 25, 2003
Eew :( Hand coding = better.
lol, and cheaper if you actualy buy dreamweaver
|
|
|
XZRM
|
Posted at 5:09 pm on May 25, 2003 |
Eew :( Hand coding = better.
|
|
|
WigAOK9
|
Posted at 2:03 am on Feb. 22, 2003 |
| don't forget Adobe!
LOLatME |
|
|
All 13 previous replies displayed. |