| Replies
|
|
|
Macropiper
|
Posted at 8:29 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| Depends what you want to do with it, for gaming on Windows, the Nvidia one is better, for 3d effects on Linux, the Intel one is better. |
|
|
ManiacPenguins
|
Posted at 7:32 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| Well, technically, that Intel one is just a graphics accelerator, which is an integrated card. It doesn't have dedicated VRAM, whereas, the NVIDIA does. |
|
|
therave39
|
Posted at 3:53 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| Intel graphics cards are always horrible, 90% of them lack proper shaders and TnL. Go with the Nvidia, the 9xxx series has been pretty promising so far. |
|
|
Leelyy
|
Posted at 3:52 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
Sorry - I'm a complete dope with technological things. :) |
|
|
drifting
|
Posted at 3:49 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| Intel Graphics solutions suck balls. That 9200 is still shit though. |
|
|
Joep0113
|
Posted at 3:48 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| My 9800GTX spits in your general direction. Also Nvidia is the only way to go with graphics cards. |
|
|
Fouad
|
Posted at 3:48 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| Nvidia FERR SURE!! |
|
|
Stellar
|
Posted at 3:45 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| Nvidia for sure. |
|
|
redhotchilis64
|
Posted at 3:45 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| Nvidia by far |
|
|
Lihiro
|
Posted at 3:45 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| *Squints.* That's a toughie. I've always gone with NVidia just because it's a good video card company. |
|
|
Ska Ninja
|
Posted at 3:44 pm on Dec. 31, 2008 |
| Nvidia |
|
|
All 11 previous replies displayed. |