| Replies
|
|
|
DavaBass
|
Posted at 3:40 pm on Dec. 23, 2008 |
| Eh FWD is ok to a point, unless you load too much power into it, then its crap, 4WD is the way forward if you want grip, if you want tail out fun get an FR car |
|
|
IMPALA
|
Posted at 8:39 pm on Dec. 17, 2008 |
| good, becausei dont believe me |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 8:06 pm on Dec. 17, 2008 |
| I believe you. |
|
|
IMPALA
|
Posted at 7:53 pm on Dec. 17, 2008 |
| ive got pictrues of my brothers girlfriends dads cousins fathers uncles friends ex girlfriends new boyfriends supercharged vtak honda. |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 2:46 pm on Dec. 17, 2008 |
| I've got pics of all of them if you want. |
|
|
IMPALA
|
Posted at 2:08 am on Dec. 17, 2008 |
| uh huh sure you have |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 8:28 am on Dec. 16, 2008 |
| Firstly I've driven many, many, many GM sedans. Impalas from 2006 and 2001 (my aunt has four of them), even a 1998 Oldsmobile 88. Not to mention I've got "friends" whom drive these and other cars. So from mild driving experience, stories from friends, and observation of what cars I see most on the side of the road.. I can conclude from these factors, Tempos are above average when it comes to winter driving. They have incredible ground clearance. Impalas, don't. Its almost impossible to find one without an mashed up, unaligned bumper from being in the ditch. Yet the number of Escorts, Tempos, and Topaz' in Alaska is not only large, but growing. In the past month I know of three Tempos resurrected from the junk yard and back on the road. |
|
|
IMPALA
|
Posted at 1:50 am on Dec. 16, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 5:22 pm on Dec. 15, 2008
This topic is begging for an extremely biased-yet-factual response from meh. Ready? Too bad they can't turn and they suck ass in the snow. Safe? Maybe, but no where near as safe as the FWD cars Ford is offering these days. Not as fun, practical, fuel efficient, modern, technologically advanced, or as good in rough weather either. Then we are all surprised that Ford is in a substantial financial situation and GM, isn't. 
Have you driven any of these cars in the snow? If you haven't, I suggest you back down.... and if you have.. it was some base model impala without t/c |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 9:50 pm on Dec. 15, 2008 |
| That statement shows your ignorance to this whole situation. |
|
|
emo sux69
|
Posted at 9:42 pm on Dec. 15, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 12:22 pm on Dec. 16, 2008
This topic is begging for an extremely biased-yet-factual response from meh. Ready? Too bad they can't turn and they suck ass in the snow. Safe? Maybe, but no where near as safe as the FWD cars Ford is offering these days. Not as fun, practical, fuel efficient, modern, technologically advanced, or as good in rough weather either. Then we are all surprised that Ford is in a substantial financial situation and GM, isn't. 
Ford isn't in a substantial finanical situation they are nearly dead too, just not as bad as GM. |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 5:22 pm on Dec. 15, 2008 |
| This topic is begging for an extremely biased-yet-factual response from meh. Ready? Too bad they can't turn and they suck ass in the snow. Safe? Maybe, but no where near as safe as the FWD cars Ford is offering these days. Not as fun, practical, fuel efficient, modern, technologically advanced, or as good in rough weather either. Then we are all surprised that Ford is in a substantial financial situation and GM, isn't. |
|
|
michael5122
|
Posted at 5:12 pm on Dec. 15, 2008 |
| dang. |
|
|
sieeeeerra
|
Posted at 5:06 pm on Dec. 15, 2008 |
explicit for pussy. lol |
|
|
trishMAZING
|
Posted at 5:06 pm on Dec. 15, 2008 |
| I seee, |
|
|
iHaveAlargePenis
|
Posted at 5:06 pm on Dec. 15, 2008 |
| Wut? |
|
|
Most recent 15 of 15 previous replies displayed. |