LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 516 users online 268351 members 308 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | FAQ
Member Spotlight
starry night
Movies: The Rite, Death at a Funeral, Angels &...
Mood: Excited
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
3 online / 9 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / Politics & Government / Adding Reply

Quoting Post
Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum.
Topic Which non-white group will the US government apologize to next?
Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds)
Password   Forgotten your password?
Post

Font:   Size:   Color:

FAQ Keyword Search:
Post Options
Favorites Manager
Notify me of new replies to this topic by email
Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message
Original Post
bobbarr1 Posted at 7:04 pm on June 19, 2012

House apologizes for laws targeting Chinese immigrants

By Richard Simon

June 18, 2012, 3:00 p.m.

WASHINGTON — One hundred and thirty years after passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act, the House on Monday expressed its regret for enacting discriminatory laws targeting Chinese immigrants.

The rare apology came on a resolution sponsored by Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.), the first Chinese American woman elected to Congress.

"This is a proud moment for all Americans who treasure justice and equality,'' said Carolyn Hong Chan, national president of the Chinese American Citizens Alliance.

Chu, whose grandfather was forced to register and carry a certificate of residence for about 40 years because of the laws, told House colleagues Monday: "It is for my grandfather and for all Chinese Americans who were told for six decades by the U.S. government that the land of the free wasn't open to them that we must pass this resolution.

"We must finally and formally acknowledge these ugly laws that were incompatible with America's founding principles,'' she added. "By doing so, we will acknowledge that discrimination has no place in our society.''

The Senate approved a similar resolution last fall.

"It's a very significant day for the Chinese American community,'' said Martin Gold, a Washington, D.C., lobbyist who volunteered his services to Chinese American groups to help win passage of the resolution.

"It's a point of closure,'' he added, noting that many Chinese Americans have personal stories about family members affected by anti-Chinese laws.

The vote came after Chu revised the resolution to specify that nothing in it should be construed as support for reparations.

Chu was approached by a coalition of Chinese American groups to introduce the resolution shortly after her election to the House in 2009.  The resolution made it to the House floor after Chinese Americans stepped up efforts to persuade their representatives to support the measure.  

"It took a nationwide effort,'' she said in an interview.

To call attention to the resolution, she recently held a news conference at the downtown Los Angeles site of the 1871 Chinese Massacre, in which 19 Chinese were killed by a mob of about 500.

Between 1879 and 1904, Congress passed a number of laws targeting Chinese immigrants, including the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, signed by President Arthur. It barred Chinese laborers from entering the country for a decade (and later extended) and denied U.S. citizenship to Chinese immigrants already here. The law was repealed in 1943 after China became a U.S. ally in World War II.

In 2009, California issued a similar apology for the state's discrimination against Chinese  immigrants.

Congress has issued similar apologies before, but they are rare.

In 1993, Congress apologized to Hawaiians for the U.S.-led overthrow of their monarchy in 1893.

In 1988, President Reagan signed legislation providing $1.25 billion, or $20,000 each, in reparations and a formal apology for Japanese Americans interned during World War II.

In 2008, the House issued an apology to African Americans "on behalf of the people of the United States, for the wrongs committed against them and their ancestors who suffered under slavery and Jim Crow." The Senate passed a similar resolution a year later.

Link

Replies
Waddiwasi Posted at 9:32 pm on June 25, 2012
Quote: from kidd rune at 1:05 am on June 20, 2012

Quote: from Waddiwasi at 12:25 am on June 20, 2012

Assuming that this information is correct, why is it acceptable to treat an entire group of people as inferiors because of their intellect?
It's not as "Inferiors" because superiority and inferiority are subjective and are not based on one single trait.
However, it is acceptable to treat a group differently if in fact they are different because there's no reason to expect them not to be different. And really what do Whites gain from having Blacks as their "Equals"? Higher crime rates, lower national IQ, lower living standards, higher STD rates, higher % of rapists, graudal dumbing-down of the schools, etc.
It works in the ethnic interests of Whites to have their own land and self-government without Blacks in it. Unless of course you think that White people are the only people with no moral right to land and self-government.

What is your solution to this problem, kidd rune?
Force all blacks, Hispanics, etc. to leave the United States?
You speak as though you have more of a right to live in America than people of "less intellectual" races. You can't just marginalize an entire race of people because you believe your race is of higher intellect.
A society will crumble if you remove an entire class, or any working group of people in its entirety.

lollerwhat Posted at 10:08 pm on June 19, 2012
Quote: from Bud2400 at 9:50 pm on June 19, 2012

I think the US government should apologize to the Turks for actually believing the Armenian "genocide" was a genocide.

i could get behind that one

kidd rune Posted at 10:05 pm on June 19, 2012
Quote: from Waddiwasi at 12:25 am on June 20, 2012

Assuming that this information is correct, why is it acceptable to treat an entire group of people as inferiors because of their intellect?
It's not as "Inferiors" because superiority and inferiority are subjective and are not based on one single trait.
However, it is acceptable to treat a group differently if in fact they are different because there's no reason to expect them not to be different. And really what do Whites gain from having Blacks as their "Equals"? Higher crime rates, lower national IQ, lower living standards, higher STD rates, higher % of rapists, graudal dumbing-down of the schools, etc.
It works in the ethnic interests of Whites to have their own land and self-government without Blacks in it. Unless of course you think that White people are the only people with no moral right to land and self-government.
Bud2400 Posted at 9:50 pm on June 19, 2012
I think the US government should apologize to the Turks for actually believing the Armenian "genocide" was a genocide.
Waddiwasi Posted at 9:25 pm on June 19, 2012
Quote: from kidd rune at 11:05 pm on June 19, 2012

Quote: from Cenere at 10:06 pm on June 19, 2012

Lol. America's full of shit.  

"Oh lets oppress this race and then apologize a century later."

I wouldn't want their bullshit apology, they can go shove it up their colon.


Whose fault is it that our biggest minority groups have an IQ of up to an entire standard deviation below Whites in the USA?
Their own faults due to their collective predisposition to low intelligence?
or
White people for being "Racists"?


Assuming that this information is correct, why is it acceptable to treat an entire group of people as inferiors because of their intellect?

kidd rune Posted at 8:05 pm on June 19, 2012
Quote: from Cenere at 10:06 pm on June 19, 2012

Lol. America's full of shit.

"Oh lets oppress this race and then apologize a century later."  

I wouldn't want their bullshit apology, they can go shove it up their colon.


Whose fault is it that our biggest minority groups have an IQ of up to an entire standard deviation below Whites in the USA?
Their own faults due to their collective predisposition to low intelligence?
or
White people for being "Racists"?
lollerwhat Posted at 8:04 pm on June 19, 2012
So when are we going to get the apologies for denying whites and men jobs and admissions into schools on the basis of the color of their skin or their sex?

When are we going to get a formal apology for enacting legislation that stated that men couldn't be victims of domestic violence?

greatescape Posted at 7:30 pm on June 19, 2012
Quote: from Waddiwasi at 4:07 am on June 20, 2012

Why is it wrong for us to apologize for people we fucked over in the past?

I agree.  It's not so much saying that the people who are alive or in charge today are responsible for it.  It's a formal acknowledgement that what happened was wrongdoing at the hands of the government.

The Vatican has done the exact same thing.  Yet when countries do it...it's "liberal yuppies".  Because you know, the vatican is so liberal

im black Posted at 7:10 pm on June 19, 2012
i am so sorry for what i have done 113 years before i was born. i should not have done it.
Waddiwasi Posted at 7:07 pm on June 19, 2012
Why is it wrong for us to apologize for people we fucked over in the past?
Luxe Posted at 7:06 pm on June 19, 2012
Lol. America's full of shit.

"Oh lets oppress this race and then apologize a century later."

I wouldn't want their bullshit apology, they can go shove it up their colon.

All 11 previous replies displayed.