Quoting Post Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic who approved dolce e gabbanas avatar Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] Quote: from [admin]The Professional[/admin] at 9:03 pm on Aug. 16, 2008[quote]The rule is unwritten.  Basically, if you're in a setting that would require swimwear, it's allowed.  But if you're standing in front of your mirror in a bikini, it's denied. If it was completely up to me, would I care if a 13 year old wanted to have a picture of herself in her bikini?  No.  But the team has came up with the standard, and as a team member, I will go along with that. Why can't it be justified?  I'm not here to decide if a topic title is good or not, or if I would use the same topic title.  If someone wants to say fuck three times in their topic title, then that's their choice.  I'll edit it when it stretches the screen and reaches an excessive amount. So, porn = the word fuck twice, huh, Angel?[/quote] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post Micus Posted at 3:14 pm on Aug. 12, 2008 underwear isn't allowed

Replies dolce e gabbana Posted at 8:05 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 can i use that avatar again? seriously..it's underwear you guys see it daily iconoclast Posted at 6:53 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 9:03 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 7:59 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Even the Prince isn't infallible. So, I guess that means that I've asked another question for which you have no answer... Of course not. I can answer every question. That's why they call me Probot. The answer to your question: It's either a carry over from when LiveWire's words were censored - OR it's intended. If it's the first option, we obviously need not go further. If it's the second option: Signatures =/= everyday posting. Perhaps David envisioned people filling the entire box full of capital letter "FUCK"s, which would be excessive, and disabled it. Either way, it simply goes to show, if David really wanted a bad language free environment, he could have it without much trouble at all, further creating a fallacy in your arguments. no they call you probot because you're so fucking boring at least that's what I think anyway i think we should just allow all cursing and shut up Forever Angel Posted at 6:20 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 8:03 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 7:59 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Even the Prince isn't infallible. So, I guess that means that I've asked another question for which you have no answer... Of course not.  I can answer every question.  That's why they call me Probot. The answer to your question:  It's either a carry over from when LiveWire's words were censored - OR it's intended.  If it's the first option, we obviously need not go further.  If it's the second option: Signatures =/= everyday posting.  Perhaps David envisioned people filling the entire box full of capital letter "FUCK"s, which would be excessive, and disabled it.  Either way, it simply goes to show, if David really wanted a bad language free environment, he could have it without much trouble at all, further creating a fallacy in your arguments. Or he could have just wanted to not stifle discussion. Knowing that teens use that kind of language a lot, censoring everything would have hampered free discussion. But he still put the 'rule' in place about excessive language... why? Maybe because he didn't think of saying "language you would use in your classroom" as a guide, similar to "wearing what you could walk down the street in". The Professional Posted at 6:03 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 7:59 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Even the Prince isn't infallible. So, I guess that means that I've asked another question for which you have no answer... Of course not.  I can answer every question.  That's why they call me Probot. The answer to your question:  It's either a carry over from when LiveWire's words were censored - OR it's intended.  If it's the first option, we obviously need not go further.  If it's the second option: Signatures =/= everyday posting.  Perhaps David envisioned people filling the entire box full of capital letter "FUCK"s, which would be excessive, and disabled it.  Either way, it simply goes to show, if David really wanted a bad language free environment, he could have it without much trouble at all, further creating a fallacy in your arguments. Forever Angel Posted at 5:59 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:54 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 7:53 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:41 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 To my knowledge, and to the moderator I checked with knowledge, there is currently no rule that doesn't allow "fuck" in custom titles or signatures.     That's what you was supposed to be able to read, but with someone who didn't know the definition of subjective, I should've knownnnnnnnn. PoP has failed me.   Even the Prince isn't infallible. So, I guess that means that I've asked another question for which you have no answer... The Professional Posted at 5:54 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 7:53 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:41 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 To my knowledge, and to the moderator I checked with knowledge, there is currently no rule that doesn't allow "fuck" in custom titles or signatures.    That's what you was supposed to be able to read, but with someone who didn't know the definition of subjective, I should've knownnnnnnnn. PoP has failed me.   Forever Angel Posted at 5:53 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:41 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 To my knowledge, and to the moderator I checked with knowledge, there is currently no rule that doesn't allow "fuck" in custom titles or signatures. That's what you was supposed to be able to read, but with someone who didn't know the definition of subjective, I should've knownnnnnnnn. hI jAMES Posted at 5:43 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 8:21 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 7:17 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:10 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 That's pretty much what subjective means, yes.  The rule is subjective.  Therefore I am FORCED to define "excessive" and "vulgar" in my own terms.  See the fallacy in your long and pointless argument now? Well, since you seem unable to justify your view other than 'subjective' reasoning, tell me... why are some of these words that YOU have no problem with, forbidden in signatures or the 'customizable' rank? Even a single instance is not allowed. Why is that? I've never heard of such a ruling. In 255 days of moderating, I've never seen an issue brought up with this. It has in the forums, I believe. http://www.golivewire.com/forums/peer-yatpaos-support-yn.html#16 Use edit>find>signature to find them easier. Maybe I'm mentioning something else. The Professional Posted at 5:41 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 To my knowledge, and to the moderator I checked with knowledge, there is currently no rule that doesn't allow "fuck" in custom titles or signatures. That's what you was supposed to be able to read, but with someone who didn't know the definition of subjective, I should've knownnnnnnnn. Forever Angel Posted at 5:36 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:27 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Do you have a complete inability to read between the lines? With you... I don't even try. You can't answer even a simple question. I didn't ask about 'issues'. I asked 'why'. You seem to avoid any straight forward responses. The Professional Posted at 5:27 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Do you have a complete inability to read between the lines? Forever Angel Posted at 5:25 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:21 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 7:17 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:10 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 That's pretty much what subjective means, yes.  The rule is subjective.  Therefore I am FORCED to define "excessive" and "vulgar" in my own terms.  See the fallacy in your long and pointless argument now? Well, since you seem unable to justify your view other than 'subjective' reasoning, tell me... why are some of these words that YOU have no problem with, forbidden in signatures or the 'customizable' rank? Even a single instance is not allowed. Why is that? I've never heard of such a ruling.  In 255 days of moderating, I've never seen an issue brought up with this.   Good answer. Or non-answer, I should say. The Professional Posted at 5:21 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 7:17 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:10 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 That's pretty much what subjective means, yes. The rule is subjective. Therefore I am FORCED to define "excessive" and "vulgar" in my own terms. See the fallacy in your long and pointless argument now? Well, since you seem unable to justify your view other than 'subjective' reasoning, tell me... why are some of these words that YOU have no problem with, forbidden in signatures or the 'customizable' rank? Even a single instance is not allowed. Why is that? I've never heard of such a ruling.  In 255 days of moderating, I've never seen an issue brought up with this.   Forever Angel Posted at 5:17 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Quote: from The Professional at 7:10 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 That's pretty much what subjective means, yes.  The rule is subjective.  Therefore I am FORCED to define "excessive" and "vulgar" in my own terms.  See the fallacy in your long and pointless argument now? Well, since you seem unable to justify your view other than 'subjective' reasoning, tell me... why are some of these words that YOU have no problem with, forbidden in signatures or the 'customizable' rank? Even a single instance is not allowed. Why is that? The Professional Posted at 5:14 pm on Aug. 17, 2008 Post from this position was omitted due to content violations Most recent 15 of 202 previous replies displayed.