| Replies
|
|
|
Bearsy
|
Posted at 12:59 pm on Sep. 25, 2008 |
| I don't want the rule to be specific to me and never said I did. Stop assuming shit. |
|
|
carbonara
|
Posted at 4:17 am on Sep. 25, 2008 |
| It can't be one rule for you and another for the rest of us. |
|
|
Bagheera
|
Posted at 1:07 am on Sep. 25, 2008 |
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 1:26 am on Sep. 25, 2008
If you operate a commercial Web site or an online service directed to children under 13 that collects personal information from children or if you operate a general audience Web site and have actual knowledge that you are collecting personal information from children, you must comply with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. * 
I didn't even have to try. Good thing LW is directed at age 13+ and bans all members under thirteen. 
|
|
|
Hi Carie
|
Posted at 8:16 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 9:55 pm on Sep. 24, 2008
if you were a cop and it was the law to spray little babies in the eyes with pepper spray would you do it
...really? you are like..committing every logical fallacy in the book. extreme situations /= establishing a moral precedent. |
|
|
Bearsy
|
Posted at 7:55 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
| if you were a cop and it was the law to spray little babies in the eyes with pepper spray would you do it |
|
|
Prince o palities
|
Posted at 7:48 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
| Well, let's say for the sake of argument (in Greek rhetoric/grammar we call this a second class conditional sentence) that you are right. Being a judicial oligarchy, not a legislative or executive one, the mods would continue to reject your image until such time as new laws are imposed based on your keen insight. Your point does you no good. You might as well resolve yourself to being a ball. |
|
|
Bearsy
|
Posted at 7:34 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
| yes |
|
|
Prince o palities
|
Posted at 7:30 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
| Is that your point? |
|
|
Bearsy
|
Posted at 7:23 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
| my point is that there is no law forbidding the hosting of underthirteen's pics on this site |
|
|
Hi Carie
|
Posted at 7:13 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
| in case you missed it on your way in...this is golivewire.com..not yahoo answers. But mom, bobby gets to stay up until 930 did not work when you were a kid and it wont work now. |
|
|
Bearsy
|
Posted at 5:39 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
| oh and for yahoo answers you only have to be 13 to join and post but they post pictures of babbies |
|
|
Bearsy
|
Posted at 5:35 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
you're still an asshat spouting bullshit in a lame attempt to make yourself feel superior. |
|
|
marshmellowman
|
Posted at 5:32 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
Your amateur and incomplete interpretation of the law is funny. I won't debate with you because you've proven yourself incapable of that before. |
|
|
Bearsy
|
Posted at 5:26 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
If you operate a commercial Web site or an online service directed to children under 13 that collects personal information from children or if you operate a general audience Web site and have actual knowledge that you are collecting personal information from children, you must comply with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. * 
Good thing LW is directed at age 13+ and bans all members under thirteen. |
|
|
Bearsy
|
Posted at 5:24 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 |
Quote: from marshmellowman at 5:20 pm on Sep. 24, 2008
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 12:55 am on Sep. 25, 2008
Quote: from audrey820 at 4:43 pm on Sep. 24, 2008
It isn't something we say for fun. Legally, LW is not allowed to host images of anyone under 13. 
show me the law.
Read it yourself. It's called COPPA. 
Link me. |
|
|
Most recent 15 of 40 previous replies displayed. |