Quoting Post Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic Calculating the number of possible genetic combinations Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] Quote: from [m]shadowpool[/m] at 11:23 pm on June 25, 2008[quote]Quote: from [m]hithere[/m] at 3:22 am on June 26, 2008[quote]no, each pair is AT, TA, GC, or CG[/quote] That actually matters?[/quote] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post shadowpool Posted at 11:21 pm on June 25, 2008 3 billion base pairs in the human genome. Each pair is either AT or GC.   So 2^3000000000 will give me the number of possible combinations, right?

Replies The Samsoniteman Posted at 5:30 am on June 27, 2008 Only a tiny proportion of that actually functions in phenotype generation, however. shadowpool Posted at 11:11 am on June 26, 2008 Yup! My comp is still calculating btw.  :) Spasty Posted at 10:43 am on June 26, 2008 But isn't much of that identical in all humans? shadowpool Posted at 11:59 pm on June 25, 2008 I'm going to try 4^187500000 Then I'll raise that to the 16th.  Maybe it'll be less memory intensive. Just Waiting Here Posted at 11:54 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:51 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from Just Waiting Here at 3:50 am on June 26, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:33 pm on June 25, 2008     I was just curious about the storage capacity of the human genome.    Curiousity crashed the computer :P. Almost. "mike@evilpenguin:~$ qalc -t 4^3000000000 > answer.txt terminate called after throwing an instance of 'cln::runtime_exception'   what(): Out of virtual memory. Aborted" Hmmm. I will find a way to calculate this number! Lol, the best I could get is... 1125899906842624^1171875 LOL. shadowpool Posted at 11:51 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from Just Waiting Here at 3:50 am on June 26, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:33 pm on June 25, 2008  I was just curious about the storage capacity of the human genome.   Curiousity crashed the computer :P. Almost. "mike@evilpenguin:~$ qalc -t 4^3000000000 > answer.txt terminate called after throwing an instance of 'cln::runtime_exception'  what():  Out of virtual memory. Aborted" Hmmm.  I will find a way to calculate this number! Just Waiting Here Posted at 11:50 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:33 pm on June 25, 2008 I was just curious about the storage capacity of the human genome. Curiousity crashed the computer :P. shadowpool Posted at 11:37 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from h a t t at 3:33 am on June 26, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:27 pm on June 25, 2008 So four to the three billion. My computer will be up all night calculating this one.   Use a recursive function.  It'll work perfectly! I'm attempting to use qalc which is an arbitrary precision calculator. Hopefully 2gb of ram is enough. h a t t Posted at 11:33 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:27 pm on June 25, 2008 So four to the three billion. My computer will be up all night calculating this one. Use a recursive function.  It'll work perfectly! shadowpool Posted at 11:33 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from Just Waiting Here at 3:29 am on June 26, 2008 There are four, as hithere said... AT, TA, GC, CG. Makes a huge difference, between the pairs bond up like this, but it's one individual strand, that can have A, T, G, or C that makes up the DNA (The second strand just matches up the pairs). So it would just be 4^3000000000 that should give you the possible numbers. Then again, I wonder if that's exactly correct, because with a different combination, we wouldn't exactly be human any more, would we? I mean... from human to human, the majority of the strand is the same. Even in monkeys, we don't differ in terms of DNA by that much... most of the code is very similar. That being said, there really aren't tht many combinations, as there has to be some of it that can't really be changed, right? I was just curious about the storage capacity of the human genome.   Just Waiting Here Posted at 11:29 pm on June 25, 2008 There are four, as hithere said... AT, TA, GC, CG.  Makes a huge difference, between the pairs bond up like this, but it's one individual strand, that can have A, T, G, or C that makes up the DNA (The second strand just matches up the pairs). So it would just be 4^3000000000 that should give you the possible numbers. Then again, I wonder if that's exactly correct, because with a different combination, we wouldn't exactly be human any more, would we?  I mean... from human to human, the majority of the strand is the same.  Even in monkeys, we don't differ in terms of DNA by that much... most of the code is very similar.  That being said, there really aren't tht many combinations, as there has to be some of it that can't really be changed, right? shadowpool Posted at 11:27 pm on June 25, 2008 So four to the three billion.  My computer will be up all night calculating this one. shadowpool Posted at 11:26 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from hithere at 3:25 am on June 26, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:23 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from hithere at 3:22 am on June 26, 2008 no, each pair is AT, TA, GC, or CG    That actually matters? yeah, you have two strands, buddy. one base on either strand. Goodness, that's right!   ocdbabe Posted at 11:26 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:23 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from hithere at 3:22 am on June 26, 2008 no, each pair is AT, TA, GC, or CG That actually matters? yes, it does. hithere Posted at 11:25 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from shadowpool at 11:23 pm on June 25, 2008 Quote: from hithere at 3:22 am on June 26, 2008 no, each pair is AT, TA, GC, or CG That actually matters? yeah, you have two strands, buddy. one base on either strand. Most recent 15 of 18 previous replies displayed.