| Replies
|
|
|
ItsEllaYeah
|
Posted at 8:02 pm on July 4, 2009 |
Quote: from The Raven at 3:55 am on July 5, 2009
Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:53 pm on July 4, 2009
Quote: from The Raven at 3:50 am on July 5, 2009
Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:46 pm on July 4, 2009
That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller. But would you it in the same place? 
i'd rather have it on my side just up under my arm, more towards my back. 
Ooh I think I get where you mean. A lot of people are having tattoo's done on their side these days =\. But I think that'd look nice though, it'd be easier to cover up than if you had it on your leg! 
yeah plus i have really thin legs and i just can't picture getting much done there, it'd look retarded it'd have to be so small unless i got it on my thigh. 
Yeah whoever that is does have chunky legs. I think where you're talking about would be nice, but it'd be painful, it's on a lot of bone. |
|
|
the raven
|
Posted at 7:55 pm on July 4, 2009 |
Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:53 pm on July 4, 2009
Quote: from The Raven at 3:50 am on July 5, 2009
Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:46 pm on July 4, 2009
That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller. But would you it in the same place? 
i'd rather have it on my side just up under my arm, more towards my back. 
Ooh I think I get where you mean. A lot of people are having tattoo's done on their side these days =\. But I think that'd look nice though, it'd be easier to cover up than if you had it on your leg! 
yeah plus i have really thin legs and i just can't picture getting much done there, it'd look retarded it'd have to be so small unless i got it on my thigh. |
|
|
ItsEllaYeah
|
Posted at 7:53 pm on July 4, 2009 |
Quote: from The Raven at 3:50 am on July 5, 2009
Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:46 pm on July 4, 2009
That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller. But would you it in the same place? 
i'd rather have it on my side just up under my arm, more towards my back. 
Ooh I think I get where you mean. A lot of people are having tattoo's done on their side these days =\. But I think that'd look nice though, it'd be easier to cover up than if you had it on your leg! |
|
|
the raven
|
Posted at 7:50 pm on July 4, 2009 |
Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:46 pm on July 4, 2009
That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller. But would you it in the same place? 
i'd rather have it on my side just up under my arm, more towards my back. |
|
|
ItsEllaYeah
|
Posted at 7:46 pm on July 4, 2009 |
| That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller. But would you it in the same place? |
|
|
addicted to girls
|
Posted at 7:37 pm on July 4, 2009 |
| cool |
|
|
the raven
|
Posted at 7:35 pm on July 4, 2009 |
Quote: from Metacarpi at 10:34 pm on July 4, 2009
Quote: from Lallypop at 10:33 pm on July 4, 2009
that person's arm looks irritated.  
It's a leg.
mhm, plus it's very fresh. |
|
|
metacarPi
|
Posted at 7:34 pm on July 4, 2009 |
Quote: from Lallypop at 10:33 pm on July 4, 2009
that person's arm looks irritated.  
It's a leg. |
|
|
metacarPi
|
Posted at 7:33 pm on July 4, 2009 |
| aww that IS cute :) I'm getting my dogs paw print tattooed :D |
|
|
Lally
|
Posted at 7:33 pm on July 4, 2009 |
that person's arm looks irritated. |
|
|
alli wonderland
|
Posted at 7:31 pm on July 4, 2009 |
| tattoos make my stomach hurt, especially when they're red like that. |
|
|
All 11 previous replies displayed. |