LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 711 users online 225142 members 926 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | News | FAQ
Member Spotlight
Thanantos
Cool Things: Things
Mood: Sensitive
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
6 online / 26 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / Race, Ethnicity & Nationality / Adding Reply

Quoting Post
Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum.
Topic If this isnt supremacy I dont know what is.
Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds)
Password   Forgotten your password?
Post

Font:   Size:   Color:

FAQ Keyword Search:
Post Options
Favorites Manager
Notify me of new replies to this topic by email
Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message
Original Post
Uptown Swag Posted at 10:50 am on Sep. 20, 2008
Neutral. If it involves going back in time and never having the other races exist, I'd be OK for it. If it involves genocide, no. I don't want anyone to die over this.

I'd rather the Caucasiod race be separate, that is all.

Posted by Kidd Rune

As long as the all the races arent killed, he's ok with them not existed anymore. How nice.

Replies
kidd rune Posted at 12:11 pm on Sep. 28, 2008

the last thing the world needs is more hate & divisiveness. with all the world's problems today, I just can't see how more people thinking like kidd rune will help anything.
Thinking like me, what is that specifically?


The prosecution rests.
This holds true actually, especially in ancient White civilizations. Greece and Rome are probably the best examples.


Again KR's words speak for themselves.
I'm not saying one culture is bad, but mixing of culture is. You tend to think I value White-created cultures over all and think they should be the dominant, but that's not true. I don't want a culture created by Whites to take over any other culture either, it would be bad for the people that live there.


1. Puerto Rico does not represent ALL latinos.
Of course it doesn't. But, Puerto Ricans(especially), Dominicans, Colombians, and a few other Latin American nationalities are the majority in MY area and tend to do this.


2. Whites in my area blasts their music at 3 am
I feel sorry for you then. I don't see why you keep telling me all the bad things about Whites in your area yet you love multiculturalism.


3. Blasting music makes all latino culture "bad"?
Doing anything illegal, offensive, rude, or ignorant because of cultural reasons doesn't make that culture "bad", as no culture can be "bad" unless present with people of another culture where practices of one culture conflict with others.


4. People in the good area of California live many cultures together and are happy, peaceful and doing well.
Good for them! Around here and many other places, that is not true in the slightest bit.

But, again, that can't be true for ALL of California.
According to the 2000 US Census, California's non-White population officially constituted 53.3 percent of that state's population. In more than 40 central cities, big and small, there are double-digit poverty rates, according to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. It is therefore unsurprising to learn that as early as 1997, 25 percent of all children in California were living below the poverty line. Given the demographics of the state, the racial implications are clear - the rise in the Third World immigrant population has significantly boosted poverty levels. This is borne out by the fact that the number of children living in poverty in California had increased by more than 3 percent from 1990 to 1997. A report by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco indicates that mass immigration to California has led to a widening gap between the affluent and the poor, sharply rising poverty, and a median income in the state that has slipped significantly below the national norm. The Federal Reserve Report went on to say that if California's demographic structure had not diverged from that of the rest of the US, the proportion of the population with incomes below two times the poverty line would have increased by just 6 percent, rather than the 25 percent increase that took place. In the Appalachia, Mississippi Delta, Black Hills, and Los Angeles areas, more than 30 percent of Hispanics are below the poverty line. According to a survey by the University of California at San Francisco and the Field Institute, Latinos are 13 times more likely to be part of the working poor -- defined in the survey as a family of four earning less than $20,000.

* http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html
* Left Behind: A Sacramento Bee Special Report, Jan. 25, 2000
* Associated Press, November 6, 1997
* August 23, 2000, The Federation for American Immigration Reform
* The Cultural Roots of Poverty, The Wall Street Journal, July 13, 1999
* San Francisco Chronicle, September 5, 2000



Races that seperate are already dead.
Really? Give some examples of races that are dead because they separated from other races.


You mean MC brought about all the hate and genocides in the world? Genocides came from the hate of ppl who are different, not MC.
If cultures and races didn't ever meet up and try to create nations together, these genocides wouldn't happen. How many times have people tried to extinguish one group of people that had no influence on them?


KR's own words again show what he thinks. If people are NOT down how can you PUSH them UP?
It started with "Many people, somehow, get the idea that..."

It's not my words or beliefs, it's what people THINK WN's believe, and you are a good example.



So? This does not mean they cannot live together.
It means they can't be united under the same common laws and culture as they can't be the same.
jakelong Posted at 9:47 pm on Sep. 27, 2008
Quote: from kidd rune at 4:17 pm on Sep. 22, 2008


KR DOES keep insisting that ALL civilizations (even Egyptian, even Mesopotamian, even South American) were created by nordish (which mean whites to him) and that nonwhites did NOT contribute anything but "just labor".
No, I don't.
Egypt was created by mostly Mediterranean Whites, although Nordish people tend to be the ruling class. And, again, Nordish is a division of Whites. Other subraces are also Whites.  

The prosecution rests.



So he DOES put some value judgement on nonwhite race and nonwhite culture.
CULTURE? No. All cultures should be practiced inside of their own walls. Many cultures include acts that people of other cultures find offensive, therefore, multiculturalism in some ways is bad.

Again KR's words speak for themselves.


Latin American Hispanics tend to blast their music loudly at all times of the day. When asked, it's because "That's how they do it in Puerto Rico/Dominican Republic/ect."

1. Puerto Rico does not represent ALL latinos.

2. Whites in my area blasts their music at 3 am

3. Blasting music makes all latino culture "bad"?

4. People in the good area of California live many cultures together and are happy, peaceful and doing well.


To keep races, cultures, and people alive.
Races that seperate are already dead.


To take away the horrors that multiculturalism and multiracialism bring to the world.
You mean MC brought about all the hate and genocides in the world? Genocides came from the hate of ppl who are different, not MC.  


What about if we don't want to live with people we are culturally different from? What if we want to be with people we are similar to?
We CAN'T! Soon, a place like this will no longer exist. Then what?

Go to Alaska! Oh wait you can't. Alaska is inhabited by those pesky Aleuts who were there first!!! Ah well no luck!


 
Many people, somehow, get the idea that WN's want their own nation because they all think that others are inferior and that nonWhites will just bring us down, yet we push them up.

KR's own words again show what he thinks. If people are NOT down how can you PUSH them UP?


Therefore, Whites are the best at, you guessed it, being WHITE!
Negroes are the best at being Negroes and the same can be said for everyone else.

So? This does not mean they cannot live together.
The Artful Dodger Posted at 8:53 pm on Sep. 27, 2008
the last thing the world needs is more hate & divisiveness. with all the world's problems today, I just can't see how more people thinking like kidd rune will help anything.
Tyrant Posted at 3:26 am on Sep. 23, 2008
Quote: from greatescape11 at 12:56 pm on Sep. 20, 2008

Quote: from futurehardhed jarhed at 12:54 pm on Sep. 20, 2008

Quote: from Rabgix at 10:50 am on Sep. 20, 2008

Neutral. If it involves going back in time and never having the other races exist, I'd be OK for it. If it involves genocide, no. I don't want anyone to die over this.    

  I'd rather the Caucasiod race be separate, that is all.    

  Posted by Kidd Rune

  As long as the all the races arent killed, he's ok with them not existed anymore. How nice.


 

 He can go fuck himself.  
 I hate racists  
 I'm mexican, portuguese, Hawai'ian and irish  
 I got black and mexican and spanish and irish and canadian friends.  
 Their the best damn men anyone could ever have.


I have nice Nazi friends.


hope u and the third reich party like its fucking 1945

kidd rune Posted at 4:17 pm on Sep. 22, 2008
Quote: from Shaknbake at 5:31 pm on Sep. 21, 2008

Quote: from Rabgix at 10:50 am on Sep. 20, 2008

As long as the all the races arent killed, he's ok with them not existed anymore. How nice.

It's well established he's a white supremacist. That aside, what difference would it make if non-white races had never been? They wouldn't miss existence if they'd never experienced it. It's stupid, but it isn't malicious.


I'm not a White Supremacist.


Can somebody please explain to me how exactly this is "supremacy" for I'm lost.
I'm White. If I'm not all pro-multicultural, pro-race mixing, I'm labeled a racist and it will stay that way.


I could very well be a White Supremacist, but I haven't said anything that is 100% proof.


besides whites
Who said it was Whites that I would have kept existing only?


    Can somebody please explain to me how exactly this is "supremacy" for I'm lost.  He doesn't advocate the superiority of whites, but rather, the separation of whites.  This makes him a white separatist / nationalist, not a supremacist.

By itself its not but when you speak to KR and KF and CC in detail you realize they DO think that nonwhites contribute "very little" or that mixing "destroy the races". When you talk to them more you realize they DO think less of nonwhites and more of whites.


No I don't.

Simply put: Negroes haven't, of course, contributed as much as Whites.

A number can be put on this, and it can be proven, no matter WHAT I think or WHO I find inferior (if I do, but I'll tell you again and again that I don't).



KR DOES keep insisting that ALL civilizations (even Egyptian, even Mesopotamian, even South American) were created by nordish (which mean whites to him) and that nonwhites did NOT contribute anything but "just labor".
No, I don't.
Egypt was created by mostly Mediterranean Whites, although Nordish people tend to be the ruling class. And, again, Nordish is a division of Whites. Other subraces are also Whites.


So he DOES put some value judgement on nonwhite race and nonwhite culture.
CULTURE? No. All cultures should be practiced inside of their own walls. Many cultures include acts that people of other cultures find offensive, therefore, multiculturalism in some ways is bad.
Latin American Hispanics tend to blast their music loudly at all times of the day. When asked, it's because "That's how they do it in Puerto Rico/Dominican Republic/ect."
There is a good indication of culture clashing with another, resulting in people of one culture wanting to sleep or have peace and quiet, yet the other not caring (or knowing).


Because really what reason do race nationalist have for separating the races today?
To keep races, cultures, and people alive. To preserve our history and avoid exploitation. To take away the horrors that multiculturalism and multiracialism bring to the world.


If they don't want to mix they don't have to.
What about if we don't want to live with people we are culturally different from? What if we want to be with people we are similar to?
We CAN'T! Soon, a place like this will no longer exist. Then what?


No one FORCES them to shave sex with a nonwhite. And there's lots of way for ppl to group by culture and shut out others. All they have to do is group in a house or even a camp and have ALL white paries. No one is ever preventing them to do that. Even the KKK has a right to assemble if they don't attack anyone.
White Nationalists want their own nation for MANY reasons surpassing "to keep our race alive". That is ONE of the few.


Many people, somehow, get the idea that WN's want their own nation because they all think that others are inferior and that nonWhites will just bring us down, yet we push them up.

This is not the case. Whites "bringing up" nations are just adding a White influence onto it. Whether it be technology, infrastructure, language, or something else.

Therefore, Whites are the best at, you guessed it, being WHITE!
Negroes are the best at being Negroes and the same can be said for everyone else.

jakelong Posted at 1:49 pm on Sep. 22, 2008
Quote: from Bud2400 at 6:03 pm on Sep. 21, 2008

Can somebody please explain to me how exactly this is "supremacy" for I'm lost. He doesn't advocate the superiority of whites, but rather, the separation of whites. This makes him a white separatist / nationalist, not a supremacist.

By itself its not but when you speak to KR and KF and CC in detail you realize they DO think that nonwhites contribute "very little" or that mixing "destroy the races". When you talk to them more you realize they DO think less of nonwhites and more of whites.

KR DOES keep insisting that ALL civilizations (even Egyptian, even Mesopotamian, even South American) were created by nordish (which mean whites to him) and that nonwhites did NOT contribute anything but "just labor".  

So he DOES put some value judgment on nonwhite race and nonwhite culture.  

Because really what reason do race nationalist have for separating the races today? If they don't want to mix they don't have to. No one FORCES them to have sex with a nonwhite. And there's lots of way for ppl to group by culture and shut out others. All they have to do is group in a house or even a camp and have ALL white parties. No one is ever preventing them to do that. Even the KKK has a right to assemble if they don't attack anyone.

fantazia Posted at 6:43 pm on Sep. 21, 2008
By seperating the races, I think nonwhites/minoirties would increase in numbers. It's just an observation that i have seen among the hispanic and black population.
Bud2400 Posted at 6:03 pm on Sep. 21, 2008
Quote: from Rabgix at 10:50 am on Sep. 20, 2008

As long as the all the races arent killed, he's ok with them not existed anymore. How nice.


Can somebody please explain to me how exactly this is "supremacy" for I'm lost. He doesn't advocate the superiority of whites, but rather, the separation of whites. This makes him a white separatist / nationalist, not a supremacist.

Saying that if he could go back in time and change the state of affairs of many of the people tens of thousands of years ago so that most of the contemporary races, besides whites, wouldn't exist is hardly advocating the supremacy of whites. He's not killing anybody in the name of the white race, he's merely preventing what has not came into existence yet, just as you do whenever you have sex using birth control. There's nothing inherently immoral about this, and if he's doing this in a bid to keep the white race "pure" and separated in his mind as opposed to out of prejudice against other races, then it's technically not even out of racism.

However, I don't see why Kidd Rune would want to do that seeing how not only it would likely completely alter the present and everybody living in it (including whites, thus causing Kidd Rune himself to cease to exist - remember, we do interact with other races, so if we were to somehow get rid of whole groups of people, the interaction with them would change and affect the interaction between whites as a result), but it would also lead to new and difference races (not just a single white race alone). In essence, such a scenario would be futile.

Shaknbake Posted at 5:31 pm on Sep. 21, 2008
Quote: from Rabgix at 10:50 am on Sep. 20, 2008

As long as the all the races arent killed, he's ok with them not existed anymore. How nice.

It's well established he's a white supremacist. That aside, what difference would it make if non-white races had never been? They wouldn't miss existence if they'd never experienced it. It's stupid, but it isn't malicious.

babygurl 2008 Posted at 4:39 pm on Sep. 21, 2008
Quote: from jakelong at 2:20 pm on Sep. 21, 2008

Isn't that KR troll lots of lolz?

Yup!

Uptown Swag Posted at 1:25 pm on Sep. 21, 2008
Quote: from jakelong at 11:20 am on Sep. 21, 2008

Isn't that KR troll lots of lolz?

So true.

jakelong Posted at 11:20 am on Sep. 21, 2008
Isn't that KR troll lots of lolz?  
babygurl 2008 Posted at 10:49 am on Sep. 21, 2008
Quote: from kidd rune at 1:33 pm on Sep. 21, 2008

Quote: from babygurl 2008 at 8:12 am on Sep. 21, 2008

LOL, Old news, everyone knows this.
It's impossible to "Know" a lie, you just THINK it's true.

Its true, everyone Knows it, just except it.

kidd rune Posted at 10:33 am on Sep. 21, 2008
Quote: from babygurl 2008 at 8:12 am on Sep. 21, 2008

LOL, Old news, everyone knows this.
It's impossible to "Know" a lie, you just THINK it's true.
babygurl 2008 Posted at 8:12 am on Sep. 21, 2008
LOL, Old news, everyone knows this.
Most recent 15 of 31 previous replies displayed.