Time on AFDC --------------------------- Less than 7 months 19.0% 7 to 12 months 15.2 One to two years 19.3 Two to five years 26.9 Over five years 19.6
Number of children ------------------- One 43.2% Two 30.7 Three 15.8 Four or more 10.3
Age of Mother ------------------ Teenager 7.6% 20 - 29 47.9 30 - 39 32.7 40 or older 11.8
Status of Father 1973 1992 ------------------------------------- Divorced or separated 46.5% 28.6 Deceased 5.0 1.6 Unemployed or Disabled 14.3 9.0 Not married to mother 31.5 55.3 Other or Unknown 2.7 5.5
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfareblack.htm
http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/myths.html
just saying....
So in your case you think NO one can point to a motive? How about the fact hat you want to be segregated from them yet you have still 6 years in which you vae to be around nonwhites and you claim that you WILL BE KILLED for your wanting a white nation? To you everything is about race or about rac-esurvival. So You would have a race-based motive yeah.
Perhaps I didn't even SEE the victim and didn't know of his race.
You don't have to say that you want to kill a black person to point to some race-based motive. Escpcially if there is NOT other motive.
BTW I don't say that all of that is true of you or that you WOULD do it. I am just telling you HOW ppl could point backwards to some motive. I am no lawyer though so it is all guesswork. I don't really know how its done.
None of which proves they WANTED to harm whites becuase they were whites.
We don't know and therefore we can't claim it either way.
Yes they do. Your writings. Your previous claims. Your ppattern of work. The absence of OTHER motives.
There were LESS THAN 10 cases of White on black rape, yet OVER THIRTY THOUSAND cases of Black on White.
How do you know that EVERY SINGLE person that had race as a motive admitted it? How do you know that people that had NO race motive weren't accused of having one?
I can go shoot a Negro because he's Black and say it was for a different reason - they have no way of knowing, do they?
Based on just 10? You can make some generalizing based on just 10?
Oh thats right. If evidence pawns your claim then its NOT true. Same with holocaust evidence etc...
Holocaust evidence.... No need to go there Jakelong...
And there have been a plenty that did. But they don't even have to.
You can conclude that Blacks want to rape Whites more than vice versa.
So, therefore, the statistics aren't true.
The bias itself can't be determined unless the criminal SAYS there was a racial bias - and that's only the ones that admit it.
Here is the definition
A hate crime, also known as a bias crime, is a criminal offense committed against a person, property, or society that is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender's bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin.
Do you know yourself?
And?
Most rapes are done by ppl known by the victim. But we don't know if they were planned and how.
They DO. Just not is the same numbers. Why? Ask them.
It is challenged in court. But the officers are the ones who mark it down that way. If you want an example of how the system works go to p14 in that doc http://ag.ca.gov/cjsc/publications/hatecrimes/hc05/preface05.pdf
http://ag.ca.gov/cjsc/publications/hatecrimes/hc05/preface05.pdf
How many rapes, out of 30,000, do you think were planned? A number please.
Because there were THIRTY THOUSAND. I'm 100% sure that OVER 10 were planned.
They knew who they were going to rape BEFORE starting the act.
Why don't Whites rape Blacks?
So a police officer sees if it was Race related, writes it down, and that NEVER gets challenged?
Again that YOUR opinion. Not proven fact.
And as you know MORE LIKELY =/= SURELY.
What makes YOU so sure they were?
What do you really mean by "planned"? You mean 2 months in advance? 2 weeks? 2 days? 2 hours? 2 minutes?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_rape BTW most rapes are on ppl that are KNOWN to the rapist. The interracial rapes are prolly more bcause of lust, opportuinity etc...
BTW most rapes are on ppl that are KNOWN to the rapist. The interracial rapes are prolly more bcause of lust, opportuinity etc...
Nope. A judge does law INTERPRETATION.
Blacks might be MORE LIKELY to be arrested thats for sure. As usual.
I'm sure MOST OF THE TIME that they chose who to rape.
But I thought there were more Whites on welfare...
Seriously Jakelong, if you don't think any of those rapes were planned...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_rape
I assume the Judge does, but I don't know for sure.
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER - An employee, the duties of whose position are primarily the prevention, investigation, apprehension, or detention of individuals suspected or convicted of offenses against the criminal laws, including an employee engaged in this activity who is transferred to a supervisory or administrative position; or serving as a probation or pretrial services officer.
http://www.lectlaw.com/def/l008.htm
more hate crimes have been committed AGAINST Negroes BECAUSE Whites are a larger portion of the population.
What part of MOST OF THE TIME you don't understand?
Expected compared to the fact that whites are MORE LIKELY to be richer so would be a GREATER target. But they are not.
As I said rapes are more emotional/personal things so tthey fall off the wall. Might well ask why men rape girls more than the other way around.
LAW ENFORCEMENT refers to cops.
"equal" in what way? What is shows that the stats show that your MOTIVE claim isn't there.
Now, I'm saying that, given the stats, it's more likely for a Negro to commit a hate crime than a White - but more hate crimes have been committed AGAINST Negroes BECAUSE Whites are a larger portion of the population.
Then all of the 30,000 rapes weren't planned?
Who expects them to do how much and how much do they expect them to do? I wasn't surprised by the stats.
It could be - but why the rapes? Are Whites more attractive or do they find Negroes unattractive?
The police don't choose this - it's in court.
Well, at least you can see that the 60.6% (74% of the US population) and 19.7% (13.4% of the US population) aren't equal.
Oh its a GUESS!!! Oh yeah that is a great proof.
Which do NOT prove their real motive.
Rape motives are so off the wall that its even harder to tell or get any info from that. Theres no way to tell WHY ppl rape but most of the time its not even something ppl plan.
The same as what?
Its to be expected that more poor ppl go where the rich ppl are to get their money than vice-versa. What IS strange is that instead they MOSTLY target other ppl ppl like them. So it has more to do with where they are. If anything else it shows that blacks are WAY LESS interested in attacking whites than they really would be expected to.
If anything else it shows that blacks are WAY LESS interested in attacking whites than they really would be expected to.
And that is not because black ppl are MORE LIKELY to be poorer than whites?
Cops who are sually white..
And its funny that you use second-hand sources for your stats insteead of FBI 2004 data.
offenders, 60.6 percent were white and 19.7 percent were black
For it to be equal, 11% of offenders would have to be Black (if the 60.6% didn't change) or 109% of offenders would have to be White - which is impossible.
I called it my GUESS
I'm talking about interracial crime.
Sure, but there are only POSSIBLE reasons - no real evidence either way.
What about rape?
It WOULD be the same though.
Negroes "pop up" when Whites are committing violent crime.
Actually, almost 36% of property taken against Whites is by Blacks, ONLY 6% LESS than the White number against fellow Whites.
Well, who is it up to to decide if it was hate oriented?
Law enforcement agencies reported 4,863 offenses within single-bias incidents that were motivated by the offender's racial bias. Among those offenses, 67.5 percent resulted from an anti-black bias, and 20.5 percent were due to an anti-white bias. Slightly more than 5 percent (5.2) of racially motivated incidents were driven by an anti-Asian or Pacific Islander bias, 2.0 percent involved a bias against American Indian or Alaskan Native races, and 4.8 percent were directed at groups of individuals in which more than one race was represented (multiple races, group).
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2004/section1.htm
Of the 1,480 reported offenses within single-bias incidents that were motivated by the offender's religious bias, 67.8 percent were anti-Jewish, 13.0 percent were anti-Islamic, 3.9 percent were anti-Catholic, 2.9 percent were anti-Protestant, and 0.5 percent were anti-Atheism or Agnosticism. Bias against other (unspecified) religions accounted for 9.5 percent of the hate crime offenses motivated by religious bias, and bias against groups of individuals of varying religions (anti-multiple religions, group) accounted for 2.5 percent.
Law enforcement agencies identified 7,145 known offenders in 7,649 bias-motivated incidents. (See Table 1.) Of the known offenders, 60.6 percent were white and 19.7 percent were black. Groups made up of individuals of various races (multiple races, group) accounted for 5.1 percent of known offenders. Persons whom law enforcement identified as Asian or Pacific Islanders made up 1.0 percent, and American Indian or Alaskan Natives comprised 0.7 percent of known offenders. Nearly 13 percent (12.9) of known offenders were of an unknown race. (Based on Table 9.)
679 users online 
223432 members 1519 active today Advertise Here
679 users online 223432 members 1519 active today Advertise Here
You have 1 new message.
