Quoting Post Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic New rule: Mods can't see who anon is until AFTER they delete the topic Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] Quote: from [m]Seriphite[/m] at 4:08 pm on Dec. 7, 2008[quote]negitive. They can see.[/quote] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post Bearsy Posted at 4:08 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 If it doesn't violate the rules, they have no reason to look.

Replies TheOtherHorseman Posted at 8:03 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 The only reason this stupid anonymous feature actually exists was to lay the foundation for making you bitch right now. Fact. Rastafarian Posted at 5:42 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Usually our policy changes are attempts at giving you guys more freedom. Bearsy Posted at 5:39 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Bitches stop trying to change the policy. That's like what police/town councils do here, they make speed tracks to bring in money where the change the speed limit when no one's looking so they can give people tickets. Mods have policy traps to bring in mod points, because they're confused and think having oodles and oodles of mod points is a good thing. Stand Up Posted at 5:38 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 8:35 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Quote: from iJeannie at 5:33 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 I CAN TESTIFY that a mod once knew who I was on an anonymous topic and admitted he always checks who the anonymous posters are.    THAT MOD replied to my anonymous topic with something that related to me and therefore that's why I knew what he did and confronted him, and he deleted his post, and told me what I just said... If that makes any sense.  BUT YEAH, I'm not pointing fingers. :) Oooh it Jesse No.. and stop asking because I WON'T TELL. ALTHOUGH, I somehow did, but yeah, just this once!   Rastafarian Posted at 5:35 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 5:25 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Yes it was.   Somehow Pro was able to go through ALL my old anon topics   Only the early ones were trolling, after that I was doing damage control. Trolling is trolling is trolling? I'm also too lazy to look at it, but if I remember you had action taken against you for the trolling topics, and I can see the rationale that if you're trolling anonymous that moderators would be very wary of continuing anonymous posts by you. That was awhile ago, we may (and likely) have a different stance on AoA now. LiveWire policies are constantly shifting it seems. Bearsy Posted at 5:35 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Quote: from iJeannie at 5:33 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 I CAN TESTIFY that a mod once knew who I was on an anonymous topic and admitted he always checks who the anonymous posters are. THAT MOD replied to my anonymous topic with something that related to me and therefore that's why I knew  what he did and confronted him, and he deleted his post, and told me what I just said... If that makes any sense.   BUT YEAH, I'm not pointing fingers. :) Oooh it Jesse Stand Up Posted at 5:33 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 I CAN TESTIFY that a mod once knew who I was on an anonymous topic and admitted he always checks who the anonymous posters are. THAT MOD replied to my anonymous topic with something that related to me and therefore that's why I knew  what he did and confronted him, and he deleted his post, and told me what I just said... If that makes any sense. BUT YEAH, I'm not pointing fingers. :) Bearsy Posted at 5:25 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Yes it was. Somehow Pro was able to go through ALL my old anon topics Only the early ones were trolling, after that I was doing damage control. Rastafarian Posted at 5:22 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 5:18 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 No.   So it was on Da bears? Hey why are you allowed to have Cunt in your signature and no one else is Testing the content filter on signatures, I believe everyone is allowed to, if they so desire. Bearsy Posted at 5:18 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 No. Hey why are you allowed to have Cunt in your signature and no one else is Rastafarian Posted at 5:17 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 5:13 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Hey thanks anon   You know, what about what I got in trouble for before, marking a bunch of old topics anon because my brother joined? Only for like a day, but he joined...   And don't say that's not allowed because it is. Was that on your current account because I don't see any notification of it. Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 5:14 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 I bet it is David. I want to know who didn't know who Gary Coleman was That actually was amusing. Bearsy Posted at 5:14 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 I bet it is David. I want to know who didn't know who Gary Coleman was Bearsy Posted at 5:13 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Hey thanks anon You know, what about what I got in trouble for before, marking a bunch of old topics anon because my brother joined? Only for like a day, but he joined... And don't say that's not allowed because it is. Rastafarian Posted at 5:10 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 5:03 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Out of anon or warned? There is always the alternate account. Warned members are warned for a reason, they kind of brought it upon themselves if that is the case. Quote: from Anonymous at 5:08 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Well are you going to look at who this is? Because this isn't Bearsy but I'm anon to show anonymous support for Bearsy. I don't even have to check. This is obviously davjs. :rolls eyes: Anonymous Posted at 5:08 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Well are you going to look at who this is? Because this isn't Bearsy but I'm anon to show anonymous support for Bearsy. Most recent 15 of 65 previous replies displayed.