Quoting Post Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic Maybe this is a stupid question.... Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] Quote: from [m]jennay[/m] at 11:29 pm on July 10, 2008[quote]no, because youre not using the energy to push forward[/quote] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post anonymous2 Posted at 11:28 pm on July 10, 2008 ....but whatever.  Wouldn't you think that running in place is basically the same thing as running?  It would appear that you'd burn the same amount of calories...

Replies Iaintmarchingnemore Posted at 11:36 pm on July 10, 2008 Well quoted from the prestigious Dr. Schweblender "Running in place burns more calories and is a better workout, Bitches" kooljack1 Posted at 11:32 pm on July 10, 2008 Quote: from carnage44 at 11:30 pm on July 10, 2008 No.   Sincerely, Fat people had to laugh lmao penguinsrule Posted at 11:31 pm on July 10, 2008 you would think, but there is actually a huge difference Desquish69 Posted at 11:31 pm on July 10, 2008 you need that push... its like the difference between running on flat ground and running uphill afmc011 Posted at 11:31 pm on July 10, 2008 Quote: from jennay at 2:29 am on July 11, 2008 no, because youre not using the energy to push forward Exactly. Young Deezy Posted at 11:31 pm on July 10, 2008 nope Taylor636Baker Posted at 11:31 pm on July 10, 2008 Yea but I like scenery Same thing with a treadmill I'd rather go outside and see thing and get distance so I feel like I'm  being productive carnage44 Posted at 11:30 pm on July 10, 2008 No. Sincerely, Fat people 2ndbreakfast79 Posted at 11:29 pm on July 10, 2008 only if you ran on a flat surface. running up and down hills would burn more calories than running in place. autumn rae Posted at 11:29 pm on July 10, 2008 Not really.. you're only like, hopping around in the air. Not pushing off of anything with all of your weight at any type of speed. JuggaletteBaby Posted at 11:29 pm on July 10, 2008 nope. mucheerchick30 Posted at 11:29 pm on July 10, 2008 i think it takes a wee bit more to push off of your feet then just bouncing up and down on them really. maybe i am wrong though. jennay Posted at 11:29 pm on July 10, 2008 no, because youre not using the energy to push forward All 13 previous replies displayed.