LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 371 users online 268377 members 289 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | FAQ
Member Spotlight
polio
I haven't filled out my profile...
Mood: Cheeky
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
2 online / 16 MPM
Speak Like Yoda Day
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / Health, Hygiene & Fitness / Adding Reply

Quoting Post
Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum.
Topic Can I Sue My Doctor For Negligence?
Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds)
Password   Forgotten your password?
Post

Font:   Size:   Color:

FAQ Keyword Search:
Post Options
Favorites Manager
Notify me of new replies to this topic by email
Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message
Original Post
Lyla Posted at 11:19 am on May 23, 2012
So I went to the doctor yesterday for a bladder infection. I get them ALL the time from eating way too much sugar. Anyway, I told her I get them frequently and which antibiotic works best for me (because I've taken pretty much all of them). She refused to give me that one and gave me a different one. However, when I got home I realized it was one that I am highly allergic to and my bacteria are resistant to it. I actually used to take it daily to prevent bladder infections, but it didn't work and I became allergic to it. How does she expect it to treat the infection if it doesn't even prevent them? I called to get a different prescription and was hung up on twice, then passed around to four different people. Can I sue my doctor because she didn't listen to me, and now my infection is getting worse and more serious because the antibiotic she gave me doesn't work on me?

UPDATE: My doctor JUST called me and said she would not prescribe anything until my urine was cultured to see if it grows any bacteria, even though I TOLD her the initial urine test of just looking at it under a microscope ALWAYS comes back negative! I really want to sue, do you think I can for negligence?

Replies
ErinRose10 Posted at 1:06 am on June 24, 2012
This is hilarious.
Charlei Posted at 2:30 pm on May 25, 2012
It takes 48 hours or MORE to get a culture back, chances are if it has been more than 48 hours or more than 72 hours in some cases, it was negative, and the antibiotics you got elsewhere are nothing more than a placebo.  

You like to assume they didn't take you seriously when in fact they were acting responsibily and doing things they way they are supposed to be done instead of giving you unnecessary antibiotics.  

Yes, you do still owe the doctor for the care you recieved.  Just because you don't like what they have to sy doesn't mean that you didn't take up(what sounds like much more than necessary) of their time.

You are the kind of patien that doctors love to see go elsewhere so you don't have to deal with them.

Lyla Posted at 12:34 pm on May 25, 2012
Update: So it's been two days and still no call about the urine culture, so I had to go and get medicine from some place else. The medicine is working well, and I'm really upset that this other doctor didn't take the situation seriously. I'm wondering if I still have to pay the first doctor's bill because I wasn't treated in a timely manner?
Rastafarian Posted at 3:58 pm on May 23, 2012
Quote: from Lyla at 12:57 pm on May 23, 2012

Quote: from White Crayon at 11:52 am on May 23, 2012

Quote: from Lyla at 11:44 am on May 23, 2012

Quote: from Rastafarian at 11:38 am on May 23, 2012

Stop eating so much sugar, and then demanding doctors give you things to cure your own foolishness.    

  At some point shouldn't you take responsibility for what you do to your body?    

  Unless for some reason you have to eat so much sugar.


  You are totally right! The thing is, I really don't eat THAT much sugar! Maybe one to two sweet things a day. My body needs some sugar, so it's difficult for me to find a balance of how much to eat without getting a bladder infection. I don't think eating one sweet thing a day is that bad, but apparently my body can't take it.


 

 That actually is pretty bad.


Really?! Most people I know eat far more sugar then I do. I thought I was behaving for the most part. :[


There could be other factors in your diet which are making you susceptible, not sure, since I'm no doctor, but perhaps you could speak to a nutritionist.

polio Posted at 3:30 pm on May 23, 2012
you're young, and you know what people LIE to their doctors all the time. it may be annoying to you but doctors aren't like house who just jump to the most rare diagnoses possible. even if they think themselves that it is a bladder infection they still have to work you up and go through normal channels, because 9/10 it is just a UTI or something like that.

i don't think you're giving doctors enough credit. there's a reason why high glucose in the urine is a hallmark for UTIs, precisely because bacteria feed off sugars. you're not the only one that knows some basic science.

stop trying to be a backseat doctor when you have no idea what she's thinking and let her do her job. people like you are why doctors hate the internet and things like webMD.

8086 Posted at 3:25 pm on May 23, 2012
Quote: from Lyla at 11:15 pm on May 23, 2012

Quote: from 8086 at 2:01 pm on May 23, 2012

Lyla, if you knew as much as you think, one would think you would be the doctor, not the other way around.  

 Chill the fuck out, and let the doctor do their job properly.


Honestly I think I would be a pretty great doctor if I went to medical school. I think most doctors don't attribute a lot of illnesses to their true causes: improper diet, lack of exercise, and poor immune system, and instead prescribe useless drugs like it's going out of style. I'd rather actually help people than venally take kickbacks from drug companies.


You really are paranoid, aren't you. Like I said, chill out.

Lyla Posted at 3:15 pm on May 23, 2012
Quote: from 8086 at 2:01 pm on May 23, 2012

Lyla, if you knew as much as you think, one would think you would be the doctor, not the other way around.

Chill the fuck out, and let the doctor do their job properly.


Honestly I think I would be a pretty great doctor if I went to medical school. I think most doctors don't attribute a lot of illnesses to their true causes: improper diet, lack of exercise, and poor immune system, and instead prescribe useless drugs like it's going out of style. I'd rather actually help people than venally take kickbacks from drug companies.

Lyla Posted at 3:08 pm on May 23, 2012
Quote: from polio at 2:13 pm on May 23, 2012


A bladder infection can quickly spread to a kidney infection, and lead to sepsis if left untreated.
Your doctor knows the repercussions, you're acting like you know better. you don't. it's weighing up the options and likelihood. chances are your bladder infection, if that's what it is, is unlikely to turn into a kidney infection.

and the severity of pain is not necessarily a good indicator of how 'dangerous' it is. there are lots of painful things that aren't going to be an immediate threat to you.

your case is not as bad as TB, stop blowing it our of proportion like a little drama queen and listen to your doctor. you are the kind of person i hope i never have as a doctor, i hate dealing with people that think they know better than a person who spent years learning and practicing medicine over some person that read something on wikipedia and now thinks they're an expert.


Of course I don't think that about all doctors. However, this particular physician was a little young IMO. She looked to be late twenties and fairly inexperienced. And honestly I have not encountered one doctor who understands that consuming excess amounts of sugar can cause a UTI or bladder infection, due to the fact that bacteria feed and thrive on certain sugars. Most of them thought I was being promiscuous and that the infections were sex induced. I really think this doctor cares more about following the standardized rules of medicine than actually helping people.

Lyla Posted at 2:58 pm on May 23, 2012
Quote: from Hunnies at 2:13 pm on May 23, 2012

Im done. I stopped considering you as any kind of intellectual when you actually, seriously claimed that a UTI is worse than medication resistant TB.

If it is untreated, that's your fault at this point if you end up septic considering YOU waited a month to be treated.


I never said a UTI was worse than medication resistant TB. I said that a serious bladder infection can quickly turn into a kidney infection, which can be worse than TB, not medication resistant TB. I think that's terrible that your Dr.'s office doesn't send the urine sample off to be cultured if the initial reading comes out negative. What if you're like me, and never show any sign of bacteria in the urinalysis until the infection is extremely serious? Also, the reason I waited so long is because I wanted to try and fight the infection with natural remedies like cranberry pills and drinking lots of water. The infection has been bearable, and seemed like it was getting better, but a few days ago it got a lot worse. I don't always go running to the doctor for antibiotics when I get sick. I like to see if it will go away on it's own first. When it doesn't I know I have a problem.

polio Posted at 2:13 pm on May 23, 2012

A bladder infection can quickly spread to a kidney infection, and lead to sepsis if left untreated.
Your doctor knows the repercussions, you're acting like you know better. you don't. it's weighing up the options and likelihood. chances are your bladder infection, if that's what it is, is unlikely to turn into a kidney infection.

and the severity of pain is not necessarily a good indicator of how 'dangerous' it is. there are lots of painful things that aren't going to be an immediate threat to you.

your case is not as bad as TB, stop blowing it our of proportion like a little drama queen and listen to your doctor. you are the kind of person i hope i never have as a doctor, i hate dealing with people that think they know better than a person who spent years learning and practicing medicine over some person that read something on wikipedia and now thinks they're an expert.

Charlei Posted at 2:13 pm on May 23, 2012
Im done.  I stopped considering you as any kind of intellectual when you actually, seriously claimed that a UTI is worse than medication resistant TB.

If it is untreated, that's  your fault at this point if you end up septic considering YOU waited a month to be treated.

Charlei Posted at 2:09 pm on May 23, 2012
By the way the initial test is a urinalysis, not a culture.  Cultures require time for the bacteria to grow.  In my office if the UA is negative we do not send for a culture.
8086 Posted at 2:01 pm on May 23, 2012
Lyla, if you knew as much as you think, one would think you would be the doctor, not the other way around.

Chill the fuck out, and let the doctor do their job properly.

Lyla Posted at 1:58 pm on May 23, 2012
Quote: from polio at 1:53 pm on May 23, 2012


Isn't that contributing to bacterial resistance?
You shouldn't have taken it to begin with. That's entirely your fault. You KNEW you were allergic and you took it anyway. That is stupid and dangerous, the doctor can't then tell you to continue medicating yourself with a drug that you're allergic to.

The point is that there really isn't any underprescription of antibiotics. it's not good to prescribe them unless necessary, and that's why your doctor is waiting for the culture.


Why is it that when you are diagnosed with tuberculosis doctors want you on a heavy antibiotic for 9 months, even when no symptoms of an infection are present? That happened to me, and there's a reason they prescribe such an effective medication. A serious illness needs to be treated seriously. Infections are not something to take lightly and play the "Well let's see if this works" game.
you cannot compare your potential bladder infection with tuberculosis.

no offence but exactly what basis do you have to be making any of your comments. you're NOT A DOCTOR, stop assuming shit. tuberculosis is a rare but potentially very deadly disease and that's why they have to treat it with a heavy hand. doctors have to balance these situations, and your doctor chose to take the logical route of waiting for the culture when this isn't likely to be as dangerous as something like TB.  

youre saying that "infection are not to be taken lightly", do you honestly think you need to tell a doctor that? a doctor who has been through years of education and training, why do you think you know better than her? you don't. so shut up and listen to your doctor.


Honestly? A bladder infection can quickly spread to a kidney infection, and lead to sepsis if left untreated. I find that it's just as serious as TB, if not more serious. The pain that I experience when I get one that's serious tells me that it's no laughing matter...

polio Posted at 1:53 pm on May 23, 2012

Isn't that contributing to bacterial resistance?
You shouldn't have taken it to begin with. That's entirely your fault. You KNEW you were allergic and you took it anyway. That is stupid and dangerous, the doctor can't then tell you to continue medicating yourself with a drug that you're allergic to.

The point is that there really isn't any underprescription of antibiotics. it's not good to prescribe them unless necessary, and that's why your doctor is waiting for the culture.


Why is it that when you are diagnosed with tuberculosis doctors want you on a heavy antibiotic for 9 months, even when no symptoms of an infection are present? That happened to me, and there's a reason they prescribe such an effective medication. A serious illness needs to be treated seriously. Infections are not something to take lightly and play the "Well let's see if this works" game.
you cannot compare your potential bladder infection with tuberculosis.

no offence but exactly what basis do you have to be making any of your comments. you're NOT A DOCTOR, stop assuming shit. tuberculosis is a rare but potentially very deadly disease and that's why they have to treat it with a heavy hand. doctors have to balance these situations, and your doctor chose to take the logical route of waiting for the culture when this isn't likely to be as dangerous as something like TB.

youre saying that "infection are not to be taken lightly", do you honestly think you need to tell a doctor that? a doctor who has been through years of education and training, why do you think you know better than her? you don't. so shut up and listen to your doctor.

Most recent 15 of 47 previous replies displayed.