-- Posted by Briley 07 at 5:06 am on June 26, 2008 Lulz A mother who wanted to give a birthday cake to her son featuring a photo of him as a baby was forced to have it censored because it showed his bottom. Gail Jordan, 41, had gone to Asda in Liscard, Wirral, on 13 June with the photo of her 21-year-old son David taken when he was five months old. Staff at the supermarket refused to scan the picture onto a cake as it featured nudity. They eventually printed the image onto the icing with a star over the bottom. Mrs Jordan, of Rock Ferry, said: "I took the photo of my son to the store in Liscard and they said we can't do that - it's nudity. "It was a photo of my son at five-months-old. I could not believe it. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/7474968.stm -- Posted by Micus at 5:07 am on June 26, 2008 nekkid is nekkid -- Posted by ilyjosh at 5:07 am on June 26, 2008 Lulz. -- Posted by heidi2850 at 5:08 am on June 26, 2008 wtf lol -- Posted by Troll1000 at 5:08 am on June 26, 2008 haha how pathetic can people be? -- Posted by Kitty Kiska at 5:08 am on June 26, 2008 Its a bit going over the top,i mean it thats the case i have nudity in my room aswell.... -- Posted by somelikeitred at 5:09 am on June 26, 2008 LOL I never thought of something like that happening -- Posted by sad and young at 5:10 am on June 26, 2008 how is this any different to the everyday routine censorship throughout the media? -- Posted by Aixi at 5:15 am on June 26, 2008 lol that sucks. -- Posted by Birdo at 5:01 pm on June 26, 2008 Quote: from sad and young at 4:10 am on June 26, 2008 how is this any different to the everyday routine censorship throughout the media? Because apparently naked children makes it "art" and naked adults make it "pornography." -- Posted by abbeyqtpi at 1:08 am on July 9, 2008 Thats retarded, my cousin Manda wanted to get the its a boy unltra-sound printed, but they wouldn't let her. wtf.