Pages: 1 2  Next -- Posted by The Artful Dodger at 10:22 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 ..in order to save the rest, which would it be? Or would you just kill everybody? -- Posted by Baron Samedi at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Do the French count as an ethnic group? -- Posted by greatescape at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Whichever race is responsible for coming up with this stupid forum is gone. -- Posted by sosupkthnx at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 No group deserves to live more than the others, kill them all or none. -- Posted by hooray for rootbeer at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Fuck dem Eskeetmoz. -- Posted by Clouse227 at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Whichever one has the smallest population. -- Posted by JeanClaude at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 the japs -- Posted by FiercexMelon at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Everybody. -- Posted by LittleItaly at 10:24 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 ethiopians -- Posted by abbeyqtpi at 10:24 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Everyone. -- Posted by Alabamarama at 10:24 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from Clouse227 at 12:23 am on Aug. 20, 2008 Whichever one has the smallest population. That's what I was thinking. -- Posted by acausedelle at 10:24 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from greatescape11 at 12:23 am on Aug. 20, 2008 Whichever race is responsible for coming up with this stupid forum is gone. This. -- Posted by pinkertongrass at 10:24 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from sosupkthnx at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 No group deserves to live more than the others, kill them all or none. what kind of logic is that? You'd rather kill 100 people rather than 1? -- Posted by dr woot at 10:25 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Racist people. -- Posted by The Artful Dodger at 10:25 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from Baron Samedi at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Do the French count as an ethnic group? y not -- Posted by ang42490424 at 10:25 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 No one, diversity is like good -- Posted by Baron Samedi at 10:25 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from The Artful Dodger at 10:25 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from Baron Samedi at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Do the French count as an ethnic group? y not Sweet. The French are gone. -- Posted by The Artful Dodger at 10:25 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from Alabamarama at 10:24 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from Clouse227 at 12:23 am on Aug. 20, 2008 Whichever one has the smallest population. That's what I was thinking. yeah, that'd be my choice too. -- Posted by GrecoRomanGuy at 10:25 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 Quote: from greatescape11 at 1:23 am on Aug. 20, 2008 Whichever race is responsible for coming up with this stupid forum is gone. Mhm! -- Posted by The Artful Dodger at 10:26 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 By forum, if you mean thread, that'd have to be black people. -- Posted by ForeignFishes at 10:29 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 I think it's pretty founded to say that the white/caucasian race is, historically, responsible for the most destruction on this planet. Also, when it comes to waste and sustainability, whites are the most gluttonous per capita. For that reason, if faced with the choice, I'd eliminate all white people. That was not a racist comment. I'm 50% white, and made that decision purely based on logic with no personal bias. -- Posted by kidd rune at 3:37 am on Aug. 20, 2008 I think it's pretty founded to say that the white/caucasian race is, historically, responsible for the most destruction on this planet. Also, when it comes to waste and sustainability, whites are the most gluttonous per capita. No doubt, though, Caucasians have contributed more to our lifestyle than any other race (and probably all other races COMBINED). Ending that will halt all technological progress and slowly push us back into the stone age. Back on topic: If I HAD TO, it would be the Australoid natives of Australia. They don't really do anything. They are still living in the stone age. -- Posted by Bud2400 at 4:34 am on Aug. 20, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 3:37 am on Aug. 20, 2008 No doubt, though, Caucasians have contributed more to our lifestyle than any other race (and probably all other races COMBINED). I'd be more apt to say that whites, or rather European civilization in particular, has brought about more global change than any single entity prior to it ever has. With change comes the introduction to the new and the destruction of the old. You can be sure that the hunter gatherers of yore begrudgingly settled down to agricultural communities as soon as the climates they and their ancestors had lived on for generations began drying up, or were overran by conquerers of an agricultural society where, in turn, the successful were the ones who assimilated. Out with the old, in with the new. Obviously, change isn't always for the better (at least for the individual; for the whole, it usually is; moreover, what is "good" and "bad" here all depends on the eye of the beholder) and being forced to conform to a new way of life is met with resent by many. The Europeans, however, are a product of anybody in their position, with the same resources, wealth, outward look to the rest of the world, etc. No other race would do any different provided they had all that, and even if the things the Europeans had done were to hypothetically not happen, such change and resent is only inevitable as global society progresses. To say that whites deserve to be eradicated over any other race is, to put it bluntly, racist in and of itself for it assumes that there is a negative characteristic inherent in those of European descent to bring about chaos and destruction in the world that no other race can / would. The same really goes for wanting to eradicate the world of any other race for something one might believe is inherent in their characteristics. To be quite honest, I'd make my decision via the roll of a dice like it were a game of craps. While the deaths of many is a sad thing, I see no reason to value a particular race over another. -- Posted by babygurl 2008 at 2:57 pm on Aug. 20, 2008 Quote: from ForeignFishes at 10:29 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 I think it's pretty founded to say that the white/caucasian race is, historically, responsible for the most destruction on this planet. Also, when it comes to waste and sustainability, whites are the most gluttonous per capita.   For that reason, if faced with the choice, I'd eliminate all white people.   That was not a racist comment. I'm 50% white, and made that decision purely based on logic with no personal bias. Agree -- Posted by runthespread at 1:21 pm on Aug. 22, 2008 Quote: from JeanClaude at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 the japs Dumb. You probably got your feminine hairstyle and look from them. -- Posted by JeanClaude at 5:31 pm on Aug. 22, 2008 Quote: from runthespread at 4:21 pm on Aug. 22, 2008 Quote: from JeanClaude at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 the japs Dumb. You probably got your feminine hairstyle and look from them. You have no idea -- Posted by nigeltheoutlaw at 9:58 pm on Aug. 22, 2008 Whites. -- Posted by jakelong at 6:27 pm on Aug. 23, 2008 Racist retards -- Posted by Shaknbake at 6:40 pm on Aug. 23, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 3:37 am on Aug. 20, 2008 If I HAD TO, it would be the Australoid natives of Australia. They don't really do anything. They are still living in the stone age. Which has what to do with anything? Anyone who would seriously choose anything but the absolute smallest distinct ethnic group is a thoughtless, inhuman monster. -- Posted by Shaknbake at 6:42 pm on Aug. 23, 2008 Quote: from The Artful Dodger at 10:25 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 y not Why not? Because "French" is a nationality. There are numerous distinct ethnic groups making up "the French," just as many distinct ethnic groups make up "the Americans" or "the Chinese" or "The Dutch," etc. Pages: 1 2  Next