-- Posted by Finger Paint at 1:36 am on Aug. 21, 2008 If everyone in the marriage is happy and no one is being harassed or hurt, is it okay? -- Posted by abbeyqtpi at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think so. But we're all people, and nobody can control anyone else. ..Except rape. -- Posted by SpM at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I have no moral issue with it. -- Posted by ezacxveronica22 at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 i guess so -- Posted by SpM at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think so. Why? -- Posted by mnmandme2004 at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 its cool but keep your kids away from it... or else the Child protective services will... -- Posted by blueelectricguitar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I say polygamy is alright as long as everyone knows about it and is happy with it. There are some married couples that have an open relationship. I know that's not quite the same, but if everyone involved is happy with it, why should it matter what anyone else thinks? xxx -- Posted by shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I  would support A+B+C+D. -- Posted by melissa9009 at 1:39 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I think if you're a polygamist guy, you're a boss. -- Posted by Finger Paint at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know. However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either. What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D. What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other... -- Posted by abbeyqtpi at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from SpM at 4:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think so. Why? I personally think marriage is for two people only. But it doesn't really matter in my life, anyways. -- Posted by shadowofchar at 1:51 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from Finger Paint at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know.    However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either.    What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I  would support A+B+C+D. What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other... then obviously not everyone wants to be married to each other, and if everyone isn't committed to everyone else then it's not a valid marriage and shouldn't exist -- Posted by Finger Paint at 1:55 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:51 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from Finger Paint at 1:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from shadowofchar at 1:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think that someone should be able to get married while being married to someone else; it's not fair to the other spouses, who might not even know.   However, I would support a polygamy in which all members are married to each either.   What I mean is, I wouldn't support A+B and A+C and A+D, but I would support A+B+C+D.    What if B, C and D are of different a different gender than A? And B, C and D are only attracted to those of the opposite sex, but everyone is still happy? And B, C and D aren't interested in sexual relations with each other... then obviously not everyone wants to be married to each other, and if everyone isn't committed to everyone else then it's not a valid marriage and shouldn't exist Well... they're all committed to each other and they all love each other but B, C and D just aren't interested in having a sexual relationship together... the sexual relationship that comes with marriage. -- Posted by SpM at 1:57 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from SpM at 4:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think so.    Why? I personally think marriage is for two people only. But it doesn't really matter in my life, anyways. Well, yes, but why? -- Posted by justin1990rm at 2:02 am on Aug. 21, 2008 people get jealous. we are animals right -- Posted by abbeyqtpi at 2:03 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from SpM at 4:57 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:42 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from SpM at 4:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 Quote: from abbeyqtpi at 9:38 am on Aug. 21, 2008 I don't think so.   Why?    I personally think marriage is for two people only. But it doesn't really matter in my life, anyways. Well, yes, but why? I guess I'm not sure.. You win, I fail. -- Posted by exceedinglyrare at 4:35 am on Aug. 21, 2008 If it's all actually consensual (read: no coersion, no brainwashing, no threats), everyone is of age and perfectly content with it, and it's not breaking any laws, I don't see the problem with it. -- Posted by Shaknbake at 10:14 pm on Aug. 21, 2008 Yes. Nothing is "not OK" that doesn't cause harm to someone. I don't understand why that's so hard for so many to grasp. -- Posted by sophos at 4:14 am on Aug. 22, 2008 A cherished Christian tradition. -- Posted by Total Destruction at 10:06 pm on Aug. 23, 2008 sure