-- Posted by nobodyknows at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 I got bored so i decided to make this. -- Posted by Trash at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 I've been on fire before. -- Posted by kk327 at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 planes don't run on gas... they run on fuel.   -- Posted by Public Enemy 69 at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Fly the plane. I'd just bring a parachute. -- Posted by Baron Samedi at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 The shark on fire option. Inside a volcano. -- Posted by hotsaucii princess at 5:11 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 I PUSHED DA BUTTON -- Posted by The Fantasy at 5:11 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from Rabgix at 1:10 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Fly the plane. I'd just bring a parachute. Me too!   -- Posted by GOREGASM at 5:12 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 The last one. -- Posted by nobodyknows at 5:13 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Wow most people chose the set shark on fire option. LMFAO -- Posted by kidd rune at 5:13 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from kk327 at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 planes don't run on gas... they run on fuel. Gasoline. -- Posted by ManicD at 5:15 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Aeroplanes dont need fuel to land, the design of the wings mean that by sacrificing altitude for speed you can maintain fly and land teh aircraft safely, even without power -- Posted by kidd rune at 5:16 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 5:15 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Aeroplanes dont need fuel to land, the design of the wings mean that by sacrificing altitude for speed you can maintain fly and land teh aircraft safely, even without power You lost the game anyway. -- Posted by nobodyknows at 5:16 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 5:15 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Aeroplanes dont need fuel to land, the design of the wings mean that by sacrificing altitude for speed you can maintain fly and land teh aircraft safely, even without power You had to prove me wrong..Didnt you... -- Posted by Catalyst11 at 5:21 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 I would fly a plane low on gas whilst catching a shark on fire. -- Posted by marshmellowman at 5:22 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 1:13 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Quote: from kk327 at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 planes don't run on gas... they run on fuel.   Gasoline. They don't run on gasoline. They run on kerosene. -- Posted by kk327 at 5:23 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 8:22 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 1:13 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Quote: from kk327 at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 planes don't run on gas... they run on fuel. Gasoline. They don't run on gasoline. They run on kerosene. which is why if an airplane was low on gas it wouldn't really matter, would it? -- Posted by marshmellowman at 5:24 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 1:15 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Aeroplanes dont need fuel to land, the design of the wings mean that by sacrificing altitude for speed you can maintain fly and land teh aircraft safely, even without power Not necessarily. Maybe with lighter aircraft, but in a lot of passenger planes you won't just glide nicely. You'll have to dive and pull up slightly to try to not stall the aircraft but even then your rate of descent would be too fast and the approach angle for the ground too steep land in one piece. -- Posted by SLe3piinBeAuTii at 5:26 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 light u on fire -- Posted by babygurl 2008 at 5:33 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 LMAO -- Posted by kidd rune at 5:36 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from kk327 at 5:23 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 8:22 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 1:13 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Quote: from kk327 at 5:10 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 planes don't run on gas... they run on fuel.   Gasoline. They don't run on gasoline. They run on kerosene. which is why if an airplane was low on gas it wouldn't really matter, would it? This game is flawed, yet we all lost. -- Posted by recklesspoetry at 5:36 pm on Aug. 28, 2008 the last one, it sounds intersting... -- Posted by ManicD at 4:06 am on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 1:24 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 1:15 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Aeroplanes dont need fuel to land, the design of the wings mean that by sacrificing altitude for speed you can maintain fly and land teh aircraft safely, even without power Not necessarily. Maybe with lighter aircraft, but in a lot of passenger planes you won't just glide nicely. You'll have to dive and pull up slightly to try to not stall the aircraft but even then your rate of descent would be too fast and the approach angle for the ground too steep land in one piece. even a 747 has an approx stall speed of 120 on landing, whereas landing speeds are 150-160. using a combination between flaps and air brakes it would be possible to land without power.....difficult but possible. most pilots would come in at a slightly low angle but too fast then use air brakes to control speed. -- Posted by marshmellowman at 5:01 am on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 12:06 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 1:24 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 1:15 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Aeroplanes dont need fuel to land, the design of the wings mean that by sacrificing altitude for speed you can maintain fly and land teh aircraft safely, even without power Not necessarily. Maybe with lighter aircraft, but in a lot of passenger planes you won't just glide nicely. You'll have to dive and pull up slightly to try to not stall the aircraft but even then your rate of descent would be too fast and the approach angle for the ground too steep land in one piece. even a 747 has an approx stall speed of 120 on landing, whereas landing speeds are 150-160. using a combination between flaps and air brakes it would be possible to land without power.....difficult but possible. most pilots would come in at a slightly low angle but too fast then use air brakes to control speed. Considering that flaps are normally not on during flight, if the power ran out how would you propose that the flaps would be extended to full? Without power nothing would work considering all the hydraulics, etc, are still computer controlled in the end. -- Posted by ManicD at 5:29 am on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 1:01 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 12:06 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 1:24 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 1:15 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Aeroplanes dont need fuel to land, the design of the wings mean that by sacrificing altitude for speed you can maintain fly and land teh aircraft safely, even without power Not necessarily. Maybe with lighter aircraft, but in a lot of passenger planes you won't just glide nicely. You'll have to dive and pull up slightly to try to not stall the aircraft but even then your rate of descent would be too fast and the approach angle for the ground too steep land in one piece.    even a 747 has an approx stall speed of 120 on landing, whereas landing speeds are 150-160. using a combination between flaps and air brakes it would be possible to land without power.....difficult but possible. most pilots would come in at a slightly low angle but too fast then use air brakes to control speed. Considering that flaps are normally not on during flight, if the power ran out how would you propose that the flaps would be extended to full? Without power nothing would work considering all the hydraulics, etc, are still computer controlled in the end. sorry, when i said no power, i meant no power from teh engines, not no electricity, the secnreo is that the aircraft is low on fuel, without electricity how to land is teh least of yoru problems. -- Posted by marshmellowman at 5:40 am on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 1:29 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 1:01 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 12:06 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from marshmellowman at 1:24 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Quote: from ManicD at 1:15 am on Aug. 29, 2008 Aeroplanes dont need fuel to land, the design of the wings mean that by sacrificing altitude for speed you can maintain fly and land teh aircraft safely, even without power Not necessarily. Maybe with lighter aircraft, but in a lot of passenger planes you won't just glide nicely. You'll have to dive and pull up slightly to try to not stall the aircraft but even then your rate of descent would be too fast and the approach angle for the ground too steep land in one piece.   even a 747 has an approx stall speed of 120 on landing, whereas landing speeds are 150-160. using a combination between flaps and air brakes it would be possible to land without power.....difficult but possible. most pilots would come in at a slightly low angle but too fast then use air brakes to control speed. Considering that flaps are normally not on during flight, if the power ran out how would you propose that the flaps would be extended to full?    Without power nothing would work considering all the hydraulics, etc, are still computer controlled in the end. sorry, when i said no power, i meant no power from teh engines, not no electricity, the secnreo is that the aircraft is low on fuel, without electricity how to land is teh least of yoru problems. Oh, well that does change things then. I thought the plane had no power at all.