-- Posted by drkberry at 7:13 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 What's the big deal about mixed babies?? White + Asians = beautiful Euroasian kids White+ Hispanic= pale ass mestiza looking kids, but can tan wel in the summer Hispanic + Asian= gorgeous hair, dark tans, asian looking eyes Hispanic + black- nice mocha complexion, usually grow up bilingual. Black + Asian=exotic "tiger woods"  children White + Black= great singers..c'mon y/know what I mean Native American + White= kids get free education and access to liquor Somoian + Black= Big boned children that look like the rock -- Posted by brunette 17 at 7:14 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 okay. -- Posted by kay dee at 7:15 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Um... Stereotypical much? -- Posted by dragonking at 7:15 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 If you smelll what the Rock is....  cookin. -- Posted by LudovicoTechnique at 7:15 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 I never understood race arithmetic. -- Posted by Fight Fire With Fire at 7:16 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 I like mixed folks in general. I'm mixed and its rewarding in a lot of ways. -- Posted by drkberry at 7:17 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 I'msimply  pointing out the good qualities, no need to go "PC" on me. -- Posted by garden salsa at 7:17 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 agreed. most of my "mixed" friends are extremely good looking. -- Posted by kidd rune at 7:19 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Because racial mixing has contributed to the downfall of civilizations, but NEVER in all of history, has it done the opposite. -- Posted by The Artful Dodger at 7:20 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 7:19 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Because racial mixing has contributed to the downfall of civilizations, but NEVER in all of history, has it done the opposite. Never in all of history, has there been proof that it can't. -- Posted by drkberry at 7:20 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Because racial mixing has contributed to the downfall of civilizations, but NEVER in all of history, has it done the opposite. party pooper -- Posted by kidd rune at 7:39 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Quote: from drkberry at 7:20 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Because racial mixing has contributed to the downfall of civilizations, but NEVER in all of history, has it done the opposite.   party pooper I don't find them more attractive either -- Posted by babygurl 2008 at 9:12 am on Sep. 1, 2008 Ok, whatever, lets keep them mixed babies coming are not, I could careless, let people do what they want -- Posted by Shaknbake at 11:37 am on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 7:19 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Because racial mixing has contributed to the downfall of civilizations Good fucking luck proving that one. -- Posted by kidd rune at 12:16 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from Shaknbake at 11:37 am on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 7:19 pm on Aug. 30, 2008 Because racial mixing has contributed to the downfall of civilizations Good fucking luck proving that one. I don't need luck, all I need is common historical facts. Populated by whites, Portugal grew to be the wealthiest, most powerful country in the world. It was a great commercial and maritime power with large colonies in Asia, Africa, and America. It's seamen were THE first to explore western Africa. They brought back many of Negro slaves. By 1550, at the height of Portugal's power, one-tenth of its population were Negroes. Today, Portugal's population is described as one of the most homogeneous in Europe, having slowly, but surely, absorbed the Negro gene pool. As of 1975 it had lost ALL of its outside territories. Portuguese workers are the lowest paid in Europe. It has the highest rate of illiteracy and a high infant mortality rate. In terms of art, literature, music, science and philosophy, the "new" Portugal has produced virtually NOTHING in 100 years and, by most standards, is the most backward nation in Europe. I could go on about Rome, Egypt, India, and Greece. I could ALSO go on about Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Albania, Yugoslavia, Romania, Bulgaria, Southern Russia, South/Central America, South Africa, and even Scandinavia. I would like you to give me a few examples of how a great nation fell with its creators still inside of it, still the vast majority, and still strong. No nation is so big and so powerful that it does not fall prey to the iron laws of the survival of its civilization. A civilization will continue intact as long as the people, or race, who built that civilization, remain present. As soon as those originating people disappear, or are assimilated into a new racial group, then that original civilization will "fall" or become changed to reflect the new racial population make-up. -- Posted by Shaknbake at 12:43 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 12:16 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Populated by whites, Portugal grew to be the wealthiest, most powerful country in the world. [etc. etc. etc.] You cannot show that Portugal's climax was because of the biological reality of the race mixing. There are too many distinct factors to think about. You can go on and on and on about whatever powerful civilizations you want, but you cannot possibly show that any downfall was because of race mixing in and of itself. -- Posted by kidd rune at 12:47 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from Shaknbake at 12:43 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 12:16 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Populated by whites, Portugal grew to be the wealthiest, most powerful country in the world. [etc. etc. etc.] You cannot show that Portugal's climax was because of the biological reality of the race mixing. There are too many distinct factors to think about. You can go on and on and on about whatever powerful civilizations you want, but you cannot possibly show that any downfall was because of race mixing in and of itself. Yes, actually, you can. Or is it just a coincidence that they all fell once they mixed? -- Posted by Shaknbake at 12:56 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 12:47 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Yes, actually, you can. Or is it just a coincidence that they all fell once they mixed? Correlation =/= causation, as you surely know. It is entirely possible that: The point at which a civilization creates for itself an issue of race mixing (taking slaves from far enough abroad, having a global span, etc.) is also the natural point at which most civilizations become top-heavy and fall on their own. Obviously, the exception makes the rule and other powerful empires still surviving to this day (Why hello thar Britain) do not discount this possibility. The consequences of race mixing have nothing to do with the biological races of the participants but with a generational inequality. When two groups meet as conqueror and conquered, the psychological and social state of the conquered doesn't go away when the distinction goes away. Even when you can't tell the difference between a Portuguese with a black ancestor and one pure white, the psychological impediment of the conquered may've continued into the present generation, causing issues in the empire/productivity/whatever other issues you care to raise. Those are just two top-of-the-head scenarios, but more than enough to show (hopefully) that no, you can't blame the fall of civilizations on race mixing. It's simply too complex. Your confidence in the fact then is obviously not objective but simply because you sir, are a filthy disgusting racist. Have a lovely day. -- Posted by kidd rune at 1:02 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Once the creators of the Civilization leave, mix, or die out, that civilization will change into one reflected by the new inhabitants. For my examples, the very nature of those civilizations were changed as the new, largely nonwhite, population was unable to maintain the original technical and cultural levels of the White civilization. These civilizations "fell" because the people who created them vanished. -- Posted by Soft Taco at 1:13 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Yadda yadda yadda. I'm happy with just black people, just white people, just asian people, etc. It's not people have to be mixed to be beautiful or bilingual or all that stuff. Diversity is good, and so is chicken. But you don't see me making topics about it. -- Posted by Shaknbake at 4:32 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 1:02 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Once the creators of the Civilization leave, mix, or die out, that civilization will change into one reflected by the new inhabitants.   For my examples, the very nature of those civilizations were changed as the new, largely nonwhite, population was unable to maintain the original technical and cultural levels of the White civilization. These civilizations "fell" because the people who created them vanished. Do you suppose that same thing would happen if a sophisticated white civilization absorbed a more primitive white group? Or do you blame it on the absorption of colored individuals and not of the absorption of simply a different group? -- Posted by kidd rune at 4:50 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from Shaknbake at 4:32 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 1:02 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Once the creators of the Civilization leave, mix, or die out, that civilization will change into one reflected by the new inhabitants.      For my examples, the very nature of those civilizations were changed as the new, largely nonwhite, population was unable to maintain the original technical and cultural levels of the White civilization. These civilizations "fell" because the people who created them vanished. Do you suppose that same thing would happen if a sophisticated white civilization absorbed a more primitive white group? Or do you blame it on the absorption of colored individuals and not of the absorption of simply a different group? Absorbing a 'primitive white group' wouldn't change genetic makeup. If, by primitive, you mean not as technologically advanced, that isn't a factor. The Anglo-Saxons absorbed 'primitive' Celtic inhabitants of Britain, but still created the greatest empire the world has ever seen. The Celts were pretty much Genetically the same as the invading Nordics, yet weren't quite as advanced due to constant warring within the small Celtic tribes. The Celts, however, usually mixed in and contributed to the new Kingdom. Being so genetically similar, they weren't seen as a different race or peoples. And anyway, many white civilizations included Nordish AND Mediterranean whites, indicating that there were more divisions than one. This hadn't stopped them from creating great civilizations either. Nonwhites HAVE. -- Posted by Shaknbake at 4:54 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Let me just clear this up for myself now. It is your position that nonwhite groups are somehow genetically inferior to white groups, and it is for that reason that race-mixing has supposedly contributed to the downfalls of situations? Or do you not assert white genetic superiority but still assert that white and nonwhite mixing causes problems simply because of nonvalue-related genetic differences? -- Posted by kidd rune at 4:58 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Let me just clear this up for myself now. It is your position that nonwhite groups are somehow genetically inferior to white groups, and it is for that reason that race-mixing has supposedly contributed to the downfalls of situations? I'm not implying that ANYONE is inferior or superior. If whites became the majority of a mongol created empire, it would, indeed, fall. Same if they overtook a Negro empire. Each empire is molded to fit it's creators and ONLY them. White nations can't live with nonwhites, and nonwhite empires can't live with whites. Each white civilization will stay intact until nonwhites overtake it or the civilization get's overpowered by a stronger force. Or do you not assert white genetic superiority but still assert that white and nonwhite mixing causes problems simply because of nonvalue-related genetic differences? Nonvalue? Hardly. Read above comment. EDIT: fixed tags. -- Posted by Shaknbake at 5:02 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 My dislike of you has softened a bit just now. I still disagree with your position, but at least your views aren't founded on the idea that coloreds are all backwards genetic scum. -- Posted by kidd rune at 5:10 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from Shaknbake at 5:02 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 My dislike of you has softened a bit just now. I still disagree with your position, but at least your views aren't founded on the idea that coloreds are all backwards genetic scum. We're incompatible. If the creators of the civilization are no longer the majority, the civilization will CHANGE into one suitable for the other. There is no "superior" or "inferior", just DIFFERENCES. One could very well look at sub-Saharan Africa before whites came, no written language, no domesticated animals, no shelter beyond the common mud hut, and no wheel. Then, they could look at Ancient Greece, blossomed into a great culture, giving expression to philosophy, poetry, science, mathematics, and literature. You can then, with your own opinion, claim one as better. I'm not here to change your opinion, just present my opinion and facts that back it up. -- Posted by Shaknbake at 5:18 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 5:10 pm on Sep. 1, 2008 There is no "superior" or "inferior", just DIFFERENCES. Understandable. You can then, with your own opinion, claim one as better. I'm not here to change your opinion, just present my opinion and facts that back it up. My only issue is when the basis for a position against race-mixing is that colored races will "dirty" the superior white gene pool and cause issue that way. If that is not your position, your beliefs are not my problems. The idea that distinct races must remain homogeneous for the success or benefit of their societies is very different from the idea that white society is greater than any society could be because of white genetics, and that nonwhite races are a scourge on white society. If I understand that the former and not the latter is your position, I've really nothing more to argue with you about.