Pages: 1 2  Next -- Posted by BikerTeen at 10:43 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 i think that to be truly racist you have to HATE blacks ONLY because they are black -- Posted by MadisonIsntAMiracle at 10:43 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Thanks for this information. -- Posted by YourBlueEyes212 at 10:43 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Ummm not just black people. -- Posted by carracer at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 since when did racism pertain only to hating black people? -- Posted by princess timz at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 you hate anyone that's not your colour just because they're that colour. -- Posted by Desertfoxel at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 thank you for this thread, it is truly unique and one of a kind -- Posted by Joep0113 at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 i hate every single race equally, am i racist? -- Posted by rawrr at 10:45 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Hating someone simply for skin color. Any other reason, in my opinion, its your choice to hate someone for that. -- Posted by Pwaln at 10:46 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 I drew a black line on a white peice of paper. am I racist? -- Posted by stl man at 10:47 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 the 35432432432th post of this. we know racists exist. and on the internet they talk shit cuz they cant fight in real life and they wanna start shit. it's fuckin funny to me -- Posted by FRYYS at 10:47 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Quote: from Pwaln at 10:46 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 I drew a black line on a white peice of paper. am I racist? i dont get this. -- Posted by carracer at 10:48 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Quote: from Pwaln at 10:46 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 I drew a black line on a white peice of paper. am I racist? No. Your an idiot. -- Posted by Total Destruction at 10:48 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Quote: from Joep0113 at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 i hate every single race equally, am i racist? No you're normal -- Posted by TechnoShark at 10:50 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Only black people> -- Posted by shadowofchar at 10:51 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Being racist means associating stereotypes to a particular race, whether good or bad. Associating negative stereotypes with the black race is racist, but so is saying that Asians are smarter than other races. Racism doesn't just mean having hatred. -- Posted by Pwaln at 10:56 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 1:48 am on Sep. 24, 2008 Quote: from Pwaln at 10:46 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 I drew a black line on a white peice of paper. am I racist? Your an idiot. you seem to miss the sarcasm. as does most of the intertwebs. Alas! -- Posted by bigredron at 11:04 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 charlie? -- Posted by babygurl 2008 at 3:10 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 That made no sense. -- Posted by jakelong at 3:48 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 not just blacks. You have to hate ppl just because of their race. or think yourself superior -- Posted by kidd rune at 4:25 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 since when did racism pertain only to hating black people? Since the media has portrayed it so. -- Posted by carracer at 6:06 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 4:25 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 since when did racism pertain only to hating black people? Since the media has portrayed it so. It didn't.... -- Posted by kidd rune at 6:20 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 6:06 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 4:25 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008 since when did racism pertain only to hating black people? Since the media has portrayed it so. It didn't.... Yes, it does. Why does it just skip the fact that many Whites were enslaved by Jews? Why does it skip the fact that Negroes are STILL enslaving themselves? Why does it skip the fact that there are more slaves in Africa RIGHT NOW than there ever was at one time in the USA? -- Posted by carracer at 6:42 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 6:20 pm on Sep. 24, 2008Quote: from carracer at 6:06 pm on Sep. 24, 2008Quote: from kidd rune at 4:25 pm on Sep. 24, 2008Quote: from carracer at 10:44 pm on Sep. 23, 2008since when did racism pertain only to hating black people? Since the media has portrayed it so.    It didn't....Yes, it does.   Why does it just skip the fact that many Whites were enslaved by Jews? Why does it skip the fact that Negroes are STILL enslaving themselves? Why does it skip the fact that there are more slaves in Africa RIGHT NOW than there ever was at one time in the USA? " Why does it just skip the fact that many Whites were enslaved by Jews? " yea... when? I have never heard that before. Find me proof OUTSIDE your white pride websites. " Why does it skip the fact that Negroes are STILL enslaving themselves? Why does it skip the fact that there are more slaves in Africa RIGHT NOW than there ever was at one time in the USA?" It doesn't. People all over the world are very much aware of the horrible things happening in parts of Africa. By the way, you never answered how media portrayed that racism only applied to black people. -- Posted by jakelong at 11:19 pm on Sep. 24, 2008 It's amazing how KR can pull shit out of his ass.     -- Posted by kidd rune at 3:55 pm on Sep. 25, 2008 yea... when? I have never heard that before. Find me proof OUTSIDE your white pride websites. Seriously? http://www.palgrave-usa.com/catalog/product.aspx?isbn=0333719662 Robert Davis, professor of history at Ohio State University (http://history.osu.edu/) "Enslavement was a very real possibility for anyone who traveled in the Mediterranean, or who lived along the shores in places like Italy, France, Spain and Portugal, and even as far north as England and Iceland." But from 1500 to 1650, when trans-Atlantic slaving was still in its infancy, more white Christian slaves were probably taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas, according to Davis. "The only way I could come up with hard numbers is to turn the whole problem upside down — figure out how many slaves they would have to capture to maintain a certain level," he said. "It is not the best way to make population estimates, but it is the only way with the limited records available." Putting together such sources of attrition as deaths, escapes, ransomings, and conversions, Davis calculated that about one-fourth of slaves had to be replaced each year to keep the slave population stable, as it apparently was between 1580 and 1680. That meant about 8,500 new slaves had to be captured each year. Overall, this suggests nearly a million slaves would have been taken captive during this period. It doesn't. People all over the world are very much aware of the horrible things happening in parts of Africa. By the way, you never answered how media portrayed that racism only applied to black people. It avoids all acts of racism from Blacks to Whites. When someone thinks of racism, the KKK automatically comes to mind, not the Negroes that hate Whites because of slavery. It's amazing how KR can pull shit out of his ass. Well, my shit doesn't come from my mouth.. =P -- Posted by carracer at 5:20 pm on Sep. 25, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 3:55 pm on Sep. 25, 2008 yea... when? I have never heard that before. Find me proof OUTSIDE your white pride websites. Seriously? http://www.palgrave-usa.com/catalog/product.aspx?isbn=0333719662 Robert Davis, professor of history at Ohio State University (http://history.osu.edu/) "Enslavement was a very real possibility for anyone who traveled in the Mediterranean, or who lived along the shores in places like Italy, France, Spain and Portugal, and even as far north as England and Iceland."   But from 1500 to 1650, when trans-Atlantic slaving was still in its infancy, more white Christian slaves were probably taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas, according to Davis. "The only way I could come up with hard numbers is to turn the whole problem upside down — figure out how many slaves they would have to capture to maintain a certain level," he said. "It is not the best way to make population estimates, but it is the only way with the limited records available." Putting together such sources of attrition as deaths, escapes, ransomings, and conversions, Davis calculated that about one-fourth of slaves had to be replaced each year to keep the slave population stable, as it apparently was between 1580 and 1680. That meant about 8,500 new slaves had to be captured each year. Overall, this suggests nearly a million slaves would have been taken captive during this period.   It doesn't. People all over the world are very much aware of the horrible things happening in parts of Africa. By the way, you never answered how media portrayed that racism only applied to black people. It avoids all acts of racism from Blacks to Whites. When someone thinks of racism, the KKK automatically comes to mind, not the Negroes that hate Whites because of slavery. It's amazing how KR can pull shit out of his ass. Well, my shit doesn't come from my mouth.. =P 1)YOUR ARTICLES DIDN"T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT JEWS ENSLAVING CHRISTIANS. Congratulations. You failed to prove your point. " When someone thinks of racism, the KKK automatically comes to mind, not the Negroes that hate Whites because of slavery. " That is entirely subjective. Have you taken a survey and proved that? -- Posted by jakelong at 7:58 pm on Sep. 25, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 3:55 pm on Sep. 25, 2008 Well, my shit doesn't come from my mouth.. =P In your case it came from your eyes, your ears and your tiny brain.   -- Posted by jakelong at 8:09 pm on Sep. 25, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 5:20 pm on Sep. 25, 2008 Congratulations. You failed to prove your point.   I have yet to see that happens... That is entirely subjective. Have you taken a survey and proved that? Oh don't worry he will quote from raceandracism.com   -- Posted by kidd rune at 4:10 pm on Sep. 26, 2008 1)YOUR ARTICLES DIDN"T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT JEWS ENSLAVING CHRISTIANS. It was about Jews enslaving Whites. And it's a BOOK. The link was just a link to the book description, the below text a slight summary and interview. Congratulations. You failed to prove your point. The writer of the book claims that more white Christian slaves were taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas. That is what I'm saying. That is entirely subjective. Have you taken a survey and proved that?   It's common sense. I have yet to see that happens.. No, really. I end up with proof and you find the slightest loopholes that have nothing behind them. You actually claimed the Blue eye trait that originated in the region that Whites occupied was a nonWhite trait because "it's possible". Oh don't worry he will quote from raceandracism.com The site explains why it isn't racist... -- Posted by carracer at 6:55 pm on Sep. 26, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 4:10 pm on Sep. 26, 2008 1)YOUR ARTICLES DIDN"T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT JEWS ENSLAVING CHRISTIANS. It was about Jews enslaving Whites. And it's a BOOK. The link was just a link to the book description, the below text a slight summary and interview. Congratulations. You failed to prove your point. The writer of the book claims that more white Christian slaves were taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas. That is what I'm saying. That is entirely subjective. Have you taken a survey and proved that? It's common sense.   I have yet to see that happens.. No, really. I end up with proof and you find the slightest loopholes that have nothing behind them. You actually claimed the Blue eye trait that originated in the region that Whites occupied was a nonWhite trait because "it's possible". Oh don't worry he will quote from raceandracism.com The site explains why it isn't racist... "It was about Jews enslaving Whites. And it's a BOOK. The link was just a link to the book description, the below text a slight summary and interview. " Funny I never even saw the word jew in the articles you gave me! And I READ them. "The writer of the book claims that more white Christian slaves were taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas. " It says by muslim leaders and traders. Learn to read please. "It's common sense. " Worst thing to say EVER. It PROVES you have nothing to justify your point. If I say "the sky is blue" you can't just say "its common sense". There is scientific PROOF saying how and why it is blue. "that have nothing behind them" hypocritical much? you can almost never prove anything you say based on common knowledge and credible sources. Pages: 1 2  Next