Pages: 1 2  Next -- Posted by Ju5tin at 8:59 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Discuss. *gets popcorn* -- Posted by evilteen at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 I agree -- Posted by h a t t at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 you've stated a fact. there's nothing to discuss. -- Posted by carracer at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Man did land on the moon. -- Posted by rawrr at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from h a t t at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 you've stated a fact. there's nothing to discuss. this. -- Posted by stl man at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 i agree -- Posted by oliviamaree2011 at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 yea they did -- Posted by r o c 2 at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 yeah its impossible -- Posted by draino at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from h a t t at 9:00 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 you've stated a fact. there's nothing to discuss. This -- Posted by Lyla at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Who gives a shit about the moon. The moon is overrated. It's just space junk. -- Posted by bstodge at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 humans haven't landed on the moon. robots have. -- Posted by blufindr at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Agreed. America is a sham. -- Posted by GeneralZod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. -- Posted by barnabas at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 who cares honestly? -- Posted by auron at 9:02 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 sure why not -- Posted by Dexter Ward at 9:02 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 12:00 am on Oct. 3, 2008 yeah its impossible Now comes the fun part, give an explanation how its impossible. -- Posted by Baron Samedi at 9:02 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 I agree with what you have stated. No further discussion needed. -- Posted by MushroomSatsujin at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it -- Posted by carracer at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it Real Proof?   -- Posted by MushroomSatsujin at 9:05 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it Real Proof? Yeah, its called common sense! -- Posted by ijustdontknow at 9:05 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Baron Samedi did though -- Posted by GeneralZod at 9:07 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 12:04 am on Oct. 3, 2008 Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it half-assed? did you not see that episode? they did it to almost exact specifications and not to mention they went to an observatory and found man-made equipment on the moon. stop making idiotic claims. -- Posted by carracer at 9:08 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 9:05 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it    Real Proof?   Yeah, its called common sense! That is one of the worst arguments in history. Right next to "because I said so". -- Posted by Dexter Ward at 9:08 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 12:04 am on Oct. 3, 2008 Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it I have to agree they "proved" that its not possible to shoot a sniper scope at range ( look it up in WW2 history/ half the WW2 movies made)  they said it wasn't possible but there's been several independent experiments that proved it is, and similar stunts have been done at longer ranges. -- Posted by MushroomSatsujin at 9:08 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 9:08 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 9:05 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 9:04 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it   Real Proof? Yeah, its called common sense! That is one of the worst arguments in history. Right next to "because I said so". Well I do say so! -- Posted by GeneralZod at 9:12 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from HarrySunderland at 12:08 am on Oct. 3, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 12:04 am on Oct. 3, 2008 Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it. They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it I have to agree they "proved" that its not possible to shoot a sniper scope at range ( look it up in WW2 history/ half the WW2 movies made) they said it wasn't possible but there's been several independent experiments that proved it is, and similar stunts have been done at longer ranges. they proved it WAS possible to shoot a sniper scope, just the bullet wouldn't travel through and hit the other sniper in the eye unless it was a perfect 1 in a million shot. -- Posted by r o c 2 at 9:19 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from HarrySunderland at 9:02 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 12:00 am on Oct. 3, 2008 yeah its impossible Now comes the fun part, give an explanation how its impossible. give an explanation why it possible........ -- Posted by carracer at 9:20 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 9:19 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from HarrySunderland at 9:02 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 12:00 am on Oct. 3, 2008 yeah its impossible    Now comes the fun part, give an explanation how its impossible. give an explanation why it possible........ Your the denier. You first. -- Posted by r o c 2 at 9:24 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 9:20 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 9:19 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from HarrySunderland at 9:02 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 12:00 am on Oct. 3, 2008 yeah its impossible   Now comes the fun part, give an explanation how its impossible. give an explanation why it possible........ Your the denier. You first. it impossible thats the reason..mabey its possible now but not back then -- Posted by carracer at 9:25 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 9:24 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from carracer at 9:20 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 9:19 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from HarrySunderland at 9:02 pm on Oct. 2, 2008 Quote: from r o c 2 at 12:00 am on Oct. 3, 2008 yeah its impossible       Now comes the fun part, give an explanation how its impossible. give an explanation why it possible........    Your the denier.    You first. it impossible thats the reason..mabey its possible now but not back then And your proof is where? Your background in rocket science is what? Pages: 1 2  Next