Pages: 1 2  Next -- Posted by matto at 10:10 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Topic was a mockery of another topic that was also deleted. This topic was also part of a mini spam going on, which is another reason why it deleted. and I bidenly repeat, "this topic was also part of a mini spam going on" WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT?  It's fucking deep thoughts and random musings, it's not SPAMMING, it's using the forum in a way that it was meant to be used.  And it was not mocking another topic, it was building upon another topic in a fashion that was supportive of a random musing environment, bitches. get sum brainz plz -- Posted by draino at 10:11 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 lawls -- Posted by cum funnel at 10:11 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Mods are making up the stupidest fucking reasons lately. It's getting annoying to see shit like that. Having them put their assumptions down as fact. -- Posted by The Oath at 10:11 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 I don't think it should have been deleted. -- Posted by justscott at 10:11 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH -- Posted by HXC at 10:11 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 I concur. -- Posted by stl man at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 yeah the mods have been tripping lately -- Posted by dreamweaver at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 If it was "building upon another topic", then shouldn't you think it would be posted within that topic? With this excuse you just used... it still would have been deleted. -- Posted by Baron Samedi at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quite. -- Posted by draino at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from The Oath at 12:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 I don't think it should have been deleted. then re-add it? -- Posted by Praise the Lard at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 don't fucking bother contesting a thread removal if it was remotely part of a fad -- Posted by ijustdontknow at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 lmao wth? lol lame reason. That mod = failsandwich. -- Posted by Violently Happy at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Mods are fucking pansies. -- Posted by mtllcrckmn at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from draino at 6:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 lawls You warned for pr0n too? -- Posted by matto at 10:13 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from dreamweaver at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 If it was "building upon another topic", then shouldn't you think it would be posted within that topic? With this excuse you just used... it still would have been deleted. so now topics cannot relate to each other?  OOPS THERE GOES 95% OF ALL TOPICS ON LW, GET WORKING LACKY -- Posted by californication at 10:13 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from justscott at 10:11 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH lmao -- Posted by Justins Luvmuffin at 10:14 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from matto at 1:13 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from dreamweaver at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 If it was "building upon another topic", then shouldn't you think it would be posted within that topic?    With this excuse you just used... it still would have been deleted. so now topics cannot relate to each other? OOPS THERE GOES 95% OF ALL TOPICS ON LW, GET WORKING LACKY You gotta admit, dreamweaver, he makes a good point -- Posted by draino at 10:14 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from mtllcrckmn at 12:12 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 6:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 lawls You warned for pr0n too? yes i do. why? -- Posted by Justins Luvmuffin at 10:14 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from draino at 1:14 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from mtllcrckmn at 12:12 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 6:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 lawls    You warned for pr0n too? yes i do. why? Did you get warned for the Julia thing? -- Posted by draino at 10:15 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from Justins Luvmuffin at 12:14 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 1:14 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from mtllcrckmn at 12:12 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 6:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 lawls   You warned for pr0n too? yes i do.    why? Did you get warned for the Julia thing? nope,i told some dude to kill his stalker. -- Posted by The Oath at 10:15 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from draino at 1:12 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from The Oath at 12:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 I don't think it should have been deleted. then re-add it? If I were to re-add it without first discussing it with another moderator, it would be the equivalent of spitting on their face. -- Posted by dreamweaver at 10:16 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 *yawn* Your points are... well, pointless. You're rather a stubborn one today, arn't ya? -- Posted by cum funnel at 10:16 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from Justins Luvmuffin at 10:14 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from matto at 1:13 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from dreamweaver at 10:12 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 If it was "building upon another topic", then shouldn't you think it would be posted within that topic?     With this excuse you just used... it still would have been deleted. so now topics cannot relate to each other? OOPS THERE GOES 95% OF ALL TOPICS ON LW, GET WORKING LACKY   You gotta admit, dreamweaver, he makes a good point SORRY THAT IS NOT ALLOWED WEEEEEOW WEEEEEOW -- Posted by Justins Luvmuffin at 10:17 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from draino at 1:15 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from Justins Luvmuffin at 12:14 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 1:14 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from mtllcrckmn at 12:12 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 6:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 lawls       You warned for pr0n too? yes i do.   why?    Did you get warned for the Julia thing? nope,i told some dude to kill his stalker. That's stupid. It's not insisting harm on an lw member, it's insisting harm upon a PERSON. We shouldn't be labeled as "lw members." Therefore, you shouldn't have been warned   -- Posted by draino at 10:17 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from The Oath at 12:15 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 1:12 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from The Oath at 12:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 I don't think it should have been deleted. then re-add it? If I were to re-add it without first discussing it with another moderator, it would be the equivalent of spitting on their face. ah,okay. -- Posted by draino at 10:17 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from Justins Luvmuffin at 12:17 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 1:15 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from Justins Luvmuffin at 12:14 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 1:14 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from mtllcrckmn at 12:12 am on Oct. 6, 2008 Quote: from draino at 6:11 am on Oct. 6, 2008 lawls    You warned for pr0n too? yes i do.       why?   Did you get warned for the Julia thing? nope,i told some dude to kill his stalker. That's stupid. It's not insisting harm on an lw member, it's insisting harm upon a PERSON. We shouldn't be labeled as "lw members." Therefore, you shouldn't have been warned inorite -- Posted by cum funnel at 10:18 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from dreamweaver at 10:16 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 *yawn* Your points are... well, pointless. You're rather a stubborn one today, arn't ya? Putting assumptions as reasons for deletion is pointless. It needs to stop happening. A moderator taking something, thinking it means one thing, and running with it is not fair. You might be responsible for keeping things spam-less, but to act as if you know what the poster was thinking just because of when the topic was made is near-senile behaviour. -- Posted by matto at 10:18 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 Quote: from dreamweaver at 10:16 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 *yawn* Your points are... well, pointless. You're rather a stubborn one today, arn't ya? you're reasons are...well, reasonless give me some reasons, and give me some answers.  how come all these off topic replies in this topic aren't being deleted? -- Posted by wOlF at 10:22 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 One spam topic was deleted and the other ones were deleted because they were directly related to the other topics listed. That is a better word than "related." If you make a topic about a topic and said topic gets deleted your "reply to that topic" so to speak goes with it. Edit:  In response to this: so now topics cannot relate to each other? OOPS THERE GOES 95% OF ALL TOPICS ON LW, GET WORKING LACKY -- Posted by matto at 10:27 pm on Oct. 5, 2008 My topic was an independent topic that did not go further than "relating" to the other deleted topics, it was in and of itself an authentic random musing that was sparked by some of the other topics.   Pages: 1 2  Next