-- Posted by Bearsy at 10:01 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 yeah we'll never know what it looked like back in Da Vinci's day but the "resoration" didn't help it completely changed the color, tone, and even facial shapes They should have left it how it was and drawn new interpretations on new canvases instead of trying to fix the old one by painting right on it and taking it out of public view for 21 years In 1970, untouched: now: ^you know this is not how DiVinci painted it in the 1400's -- Posted by bosss at 10:02 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 :( -- Posted by MushroomSatsujin at 10:02 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Wheres the bunny? -- Posted by reev at 10:02 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 -- Posted by 9 Volt at 10:03 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 The first one was a lot more...colorful, if that's the right word -- Posted by Bearsy at 10:03 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 10:02 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Wheres the bunny? what you talkin bout mushroom -- Posted by Bearsy at 10:04 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from reev at 10:02 pm on Nov. 7, 2008   -- Posted by Ju5tin at 10:04 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 I like the newer version. Danker, duller... it just suits it better, and looks a tad more realistic. -- Posted by Gabriel Gray at 10:04 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 It was restored back to it's original condition as the previous restoration prior to that had severely changed the painting. -- Posted by Let It Snow at 10:05 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Aww.. =( -- Posted by sainthoodsreject at 10:05 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 wow -- Posted by Bearsy at 10:06 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from N e o at 10:04 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 It was restored back to it's original condition as the previous restoration prior to that had severely changed the painting. It has never been restored to its original condition and never will be. -- Posted by Rollo Tomasi at 10:06 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 don't worry, pop culture will fill in the gaps that technology can't -- Posted by JasonGuy at 10:08 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 10:04 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from reev at 10:02 pm on Nov. 7, 2008     -- Posted by Gabriel Gray at 10:13 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 11:06 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from N e o at 10:04 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 It was restored back to it's original condition as the previous restoration prior to that had severely changed the painting. It has never been restored to its original condition and never will be. Let me rephrase... Restored to it's original condition prior to the previous reconditioning's of the painting. http://www.cenacolovinciano.it/html/eng/restauro.htm -- Posted by Bearsy at 10:15 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 i don't believe you -- Posted by MushroomSatsujin at 10:23 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 10:03 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 10:02 pm on Nov. 7, 2008 Wheres the bunny? what you talkin bout mushroom Peter. The true Pope -- Posted by Catacomb at 6:58 am on Nov. 8, 2008 its okay, its only art -- Posted by Natsy at 7:44 am on Nov. 8, 2008 LOL in my graphics class there's a version of the last supper... looks exactly like that one, but someone Photoshopped in some KFC buckets XD idk if it was a student or if it was 'research' for a project off of the interwebs, but it looks fucking awesome xx -- Posted by Rollo Tomasi at 8:26 am on Nov. 8, 2008 bearsy, you have interesting concepts for threads but you are too young and inexperienced to ever research them enough to be definitive -- Posted by ininjateddybear at 9:55 am on Nov. 8, 2008 They both look the same except ones darker than the other. -- Posted by ElephantStone at 1:54 pm on Nov. 11, 2008 lulz, theyre both photgraphs of the painting. if you found another copy of the last supper online its tone and colour will look different to those pictures.