Pages: 1 2 3  Next -- Posted by drkberry at 11:28 pm on Dec. 1, 2008 Why is there a large muslim immigration in parts of Europe? If European citizens want to secure their homeland, then why are their government allowing immigrants to settle in? What is aryan race? Does that include indians and pakistans? What are US white KKK members fighting for, when this initially was not a white man's country. What is white culture.  Europe has different cultures, but I think whites do have a culture in the US. -- Posted by Joep0113 at 11:32 pm on Dec. 1, 2008 Because the Middle East is unstable and theres a large force of UN and US troops there that safe guard their trip so they get the hell out of dodge. But Europe seriously needs to put a god damn limit on the amount of them coming over, their starting to demand Islamic type laws be added or ask they get exceptions because of their religion. Example;Separate Sharia law courts in England. Aryan race is supposed to be a pure white race of blonde hair, blue eyes people. KKK wants to get rid of all the minority's from Jews to blacks. -- Posted by jakelong at 12:16 am on Dec. 2, 2008 All very good questions. Let's see if the local racialists WNs can answer all that. -- Posted by kidd rune at 2:58 pm on Dec. 2, 2008 Why is there a large muslim immigration in parts of Europe? They are "Asylum Seekers" and trying to escape poverty, war, and other things. Many would rather mooch off of the government and raise crime in cities than live in their own country. If European citizens want to secure their homeland, then why are their government allowing immigrants to settle in? Because the government and citizens aren't the same thing. Many of the governments are left-wing, but the right-wing is rising in popularity because many of the Europeans are starting to think twice about immigration. What is aryan race? Does that include indians and pakistans? Indo-Europeans. They composed of Nordic, Mediterranean, and some Alpine elements - then they mixed to create other classifications of Europeans. Indians and Pakistanis? The ones of today - no. The ones of hundreds of years ago? Some of them. Aryan race is supposed to be a pure white race of blonde hair, blue eyes people. I lol'd. Not even holocaust historians say that anymore! What are US white KKK members fighting for, when this initially was not a white man's country. First, when you say it wasn't a "White man's country" are you saying it wasn't White mans LAND? The country was created by Whites. The original, first era Klan? Its activities were directed against the reconstruction governments and their leaders (black or white) that came into power in the Southern states in 1867. What is white culture.  Europe has different cultures, but I think whites do have a culture in the US. White culture is all of the cultures of Whites together - White culture is many cultures together. KKK wants to get rid of all the minority's from Jews to blacks. Not all of the KKK groups do. -- Posted by jakelong at 1:40 am on Dec. 3, 2008 Indo-European refers to language NOT people The Indo-European languages comprise a family of several hundred related languages and dialects,[1] including most of the major languages of Europe, the Iranian plateau (Southwest Asia), much of Central Asia and the Indian subcontinent (South Asia). The Indo-European (Indo refers to the Indian subcontinent, since geographically the language group extends from Europe in the west to India in the east) group has the largest numbers of speakers of the recognised families of languages in the world today, with its languages spoken by approximately three billion native speakers Of the top 20 contemporary languages in terms of native speakers according to SIL Ethnologue, 12 are Indo-European: Spanish, English, Hindi, Portuguese, Bengali, Russian, German, Marathi, French, Italian, Punjabi and Urdu, accounting for over 1.6 billion native speakers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages Now if you interested on who the early speakers of those Indo-European lanagues are then read this: The Proto-Indo-Europeans (PIE) were the speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language, who likely lived around 4000 BC, during the Copper Age and the Bronze Age, or possibly earlier, during the Neolithic or Paleolithic eras. Knowledge of them comes chiefly from the reconstruction of their language, which was the ancestor of the Indo-European languages, including English. Their genetics and phenotypes are unknown. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_people In the twentieth century Marija Gimbutas created a modern variation on the traditional invasion theory (the Kurgan hypothesis, after the Kurgans (burial mounds) of the Eurasian steppes) in which the Indo-Europeans were a nomadic tribe of the Pontic-Caspian steppe (today Eastern Ukraine and Southern Russia) and expanded in several waves during the 3rd millennium BC. Their expansion coincided with the taming of the horse. Leaving archaeological signs of their presence (see battle-axe people), they subjugated the peaceful European Neolithic farmers of Gimbutas's Old Europe. http://indo-european.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Sounds lik the original "aryans" were central asians from the steppes... On the genetics there's a lot of dispute. Here's one theroy Cavalli-Sforza (2000) states that "It is clear that, genetically speaking, peoples of the Kurgan steppe descended at least in part from people of the Middle Eastern Neolithic who immigrated there from Turkey." Wells suggests the origin, distribution and age of R1a1 points to an ancient migration, possibly corresponding to the spread by the Kurgan people in their expansion across the Eurasian steppe around 3000 BC. In case you wonder the R1a1  gene i really common among Russians and East Europeans. R1a1 is most prevalent in Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, and is also observed in Pakistan, India and central Asia. R1a1 is largely confined east of the Vistula gene barrier[14] and drops considerably to the west: R1a1 measurements read 6.2% to Germans (a 4X drop to Czechs and Slovakians reading 26,7%) and 3.7% to Dutch. So one thing for sure: Aryans are NOT German or nordics.   QED -- Posted by kidd rune at 3:19 pm on Dec. 3, 2008 quote]Indo-European refers to language NOT people The Indo-European languages comprise a family of several hundred related languages and dialects,[1] including most of the major languages of Europe, the Iranian plateau (Southwest Asia), much of Central Asia and the Indian subcontinent (South Asia). The Indo-European (Indo refers to the Indian subcontinent, since geographically the language group extends from Europe in the west to India in the east) group has the largest numbers of speakers of the recognised families of languages in the world today, with its languages spoken by approximately three billion native speakers Of the top 20 contemporary languages in terms of native speakers according to SIL Ethnologue, 12 are Indo-European: Spanish, English, Hindi, Portuguese, Bengali, Russian, German, Marathi, French, Italian, Punjabi and Urdu, accounting for over 1.6 billion native speakers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages Now if you interested on who the early speakers of those Indo-European lanagues are then read this: The Proto-Indo-Europeans (PIE) were the speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language, who likely lived around 4000 BC, during the Copper Age and the Bronze Age, or possibly earlier, during the Neolithic or Paleolithic eras. Knowledge of them comes chiefly from the reconstruction of their language, which was the ancestor of the Indo-European languages, including English. Their genetics and phenotypes are unknown. That fits nicely with the Kurgan theory - which is probably why it's the most accepted. And the whole "Their genetics and phenotypes are unknown" doesn't prove anything. I've referred you to this many times: http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?jgrjqzm3yka In the twentieth century Marija Gimbutas created a modern variation on the traditional invasion theory (the Kurgan hypothesis, after the Kurgans (burial mounds) of the Eurasian steppes) in which the Indo-Europeans were a nomadic tribe of the Pontic-Caspian steppe (today Eastern Ukraine and Southern Russia) and expanded in several waves during the 3rd millennium BC. Their expansion coincided with the taming of the horse. Leaving archaeological signs of their presence (see battle-axe people), they subjugated the peaceful European Neolithic farmers of Gimbutas's Old Europe. http://indo-european.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Sounds lik the original "aryans" were central asians from the steppes...   On the genetics there's a lot of dispute. Here's one theroy Cavalli-Sforza (2000) states that "It is clear that, genetically speaking, peoples of the Kurgan steppe descended at least in part from people of the Middle Eastern Neolithic who immigrated there from Turkey." Wells suggests the origin, distribution and age of R1a1 points to an ancient migration, possibly corresponding to the spread by the Kurgan people in their expansion across the Eurasian steppe around 3000 BC. In case you wonder the R1a1  gene i really common among Russians and East Europeans. R1a1 is most prevalent in Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, and is also observed in Pakistan, India and central Asia. R1a1 is largely confined east of the Vistula gene barrier[14] and drops considerably to the west: R1a1 measurements read 6.2% to Germans (a 4X drop to Czechs and Slovakians reading 26,7%) and 3.7% to Dutch. So one thing for sure: Aryans are NOT German or nordics.     QED Central Asians from the steppes? What's your point? The Kurgan Theory claims the original Aryans to be from AROUND THE BLACK SEA - what I've been saying this whole time. And the "Middle Eastern" again proves nothing. The Caucasian (And White) races no doubt started in the Middle East... And you're using R1a1 Y-Chromosomal Haplogroups as proof of genetics? That's ONE Chromosome! That proves NOTHING of genetics besides great-great-great-great grandparents. And we all know how common R1b (which came from R1 like R1a) is in Keltics... And then you say that you're sure it's not Nordics... I lol'd bad. It's so funny you equate Y-Chromosome as race. It's even funnier that Ukraine and Russia are about 1/2 Nordic. -- Posted by jakelong at 3:43 pm on Dec. 3, 2008 Why do you repost what I wrote? -- Posted by kidd rune at 3:52 pm on Dec. 3, 2008 Why do you repost what I wrote? I messed up on the quotes I guess. Look at the different parts. -- Posted by jakelong at 5:04 pm on Dec. 3, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 3:19 pm on Dec. 3, 2008 Central Asians from the steppes? What's your point? My point? That those central asians and people from the Caucasus are the better candidates for Aryans than you western Europeans who were replaced or mixed with neolithic population. And the "Middle Eastern" again proves nothing. I am not trying to "prove" anything. I am showing that We still don't the answer to  "Who is the Aryan?" Heck we probably know more about who is a jew than who is an aryan Unlike you I don;t have to prove or disprove. Just question. The Caucasian (And White) races no doubt started in the Middle East... 1. We have no proof that the People from the Caucasus were white 2. You yourself say that Caucasians are not all white 3. If whites are from the Middle East then why consider people from the Middle East as nonwhites? Why claim that jews or arabs are nonwhites? Who is white" really?   And you're using R1a1 Y-Chromosomal Haplogroups as proof of genetics? That's ONE Chromosome! The Y chormosome is most commonly used chromosome to trace ancestry especially at the ethnic level. Ask any geneticist and modern anthropologist. That proves NOTHING of genetics besides great-great-great-great grandparents. Geneticists often use male ancestry to trace the movement of population. Isn't that relevant to figuring out where the so-called aryans come from? The two most common types of genetic genealogy tests are Y-DNA (paternal line) and mtDNA (maternal line) genealogical DNA tests. These tests involve the comparison of certain sequences of DNA pairs of individuals in order to estimate the probability that they share a common ancestor in a genealogical time frame and, through the use of a Bayesian model published by Bruce Walsh, to estimate the number of generations separating the two individuals from their most recent common ancestor. Y-DNA research involves short tandem repeat (STR) and, sometimes, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) testing of the Y-chromosome. The Y-chromosome is present only in males and reveals information on the strict paternal line. These tests can provide insight in the recent (via STRs) and ancient (via SNPs) genetic ancestry. A Y-chromosome STR test will reveal a haplotype, which should be similar among all male descendants of a male ancestor. SNP tests are used to assign people to a paternal haplogroup, which defines a genetic population. mtDNA research involves sequencing the HVR-1 region, HVR-2 region or both. A mtDNA test can also be used to assign people to a maternal haplogroup. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_genealogy Mitochondrial DNA is used more to differentiate between individuals and for forensics. Either methods can be used. You really know shit about genetics. And we all know how common R1b (which came from R1 like R1a) is in Keltics... We call them Celtics. Except that R1a1 is the one that was found...I wouldn't exlude them right off but they are NOT the MAIN guys involved. And then you say that you're sure it's not Nordics.. Nordic as in Scandinavian. I don't listen to Nordish BS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_countries I lol'd bad. Actually you react like you're having a fit. That psychopath laugh gets you every time. It's so funny you equate Y-Chromosome as race. I never mentioned race. I mentioned ethnicity. Proof again you are obsessed. -- Posted by kidd rune at 3:01 pm on Dec. 4, 2008 My point? That those central asians and people from the Caucasus are the better candidates for Aryans than you western Europeans who were replaced or mixed with neolithic population. These people were? You have never answered this question really - and once you said Neanderthals :P      And the "Middle Eastern" again proves nothing. I am not trying to "prove" anything. I am showing that We still don't the answer to  "Who is the Aryan?" Heck we probably know more about who is a jew than who is an aryan Unlike you I don;t have to prove or disprove. Just question. You say we "Don't know" but that all hangs on your definition of knowing. There are so many theories someone has to be right - but we don't know who. We have to wait for more genetic tests - but we'll eventually find out FOR SURE.      The Caucasian (And White) races no doubt started in the Middle East... 1. We have no proof that the People from the Caucasus were white 2. You yourself say that Caucasians are not all white 3. If whites are from the Middle East then why consider people from the Middle East as nonwhites? Why claim that jews or arabs are nonwhites? Who is white" really? 1. On the contrary - I have proof. It's just technically a theory and it can't be seen as pure fact - but nothing really can. Many things that aren't proven are spoken of as true. 3. Because they MIXED, were of different [sub]race, or evolved. The Y chormosome is most commonly used chromosome to trace ancestry especially at the ethnic level. Ask any geneticist and modern anthropologist. I know what it does. It tells you the migration paths of your great great great great..... grandpa. Ethnic level? Here we go again! Y-Haplogroups of different nature can exist in different places. A British man has about a 60% chance of being R1b - while an Italian has a 40% chance. Can you really determine "Ethnicity" by that? A Norwegian has about a 30% chance of R1a - and an Indian has a 40% chance. Same ethnicity? Didn't think so. Geneticists often use male ancestry to trace the movement of population. Isn't that relevant to figuring out where the so-called aryans come from? We pretty much know where they came from. Check out the Kurgan Theory.     The two most common types of genetic genealogy tests are Y-DNA (paternal line) and mtDNA (maternal line) genealogical DNA tests.    These tests involve the comparison of certain sequences of DNA pairs of individuals in order to estimate the probability that they share a common ancestor in a genealogical time frame and, through the use of a Bayesian model published by Bruce Walsh, to estimate the number of generations separating the two individuals from their most recent common ancestor.    Y-DNA research involves short tandem repeat (STR) and, sometimes, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) testing of the Y-chromosome. The Y-chromosome is present only in males and reveals information on the strict paternal line. These tests can provide insight in the recent (via STRs) and ancient (via SNPs) genetic ancestry. A Y-chromosome STR test will reveal a haplotype, which should be similar among all male descendants of a male ancestor. SNP tests are used to assign people to a paternal haplogroup, which defines a genetic population.    mtDNA research involves sequencing the HVR-1 region, HVR-2 region or both. A mtDNA test can also be used to assign people to a maternal haplogroup. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_genealogy Mitochondrial DNA is used more to differentiate between individuals and for forensics. Either methods can be used. You really know shit about genetics. You claim I know "Shit" about genetics but you're saying that you can determine ethnicity by mtDNA or Y-haplogroups! About 50% of Brits have H mtDNA - while 25% of  Uzbekistanis and 20% of South Pakistanis do. Pretty damn useful, correct? Or are they all the same ethnicity? We call them Celtics. Except that R1a1 is the one that was found...I wouldn't exlude them right off but they are NOT the MAIN guys involved. It's a small mutation that doesn't even get its own letter - and is actually the same number too! R1a and R1b... not enough time to genetically evolve into a different race. Nordic as in Scandinavian. I don't listen to Nordish BS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_countries Why not? Think the Nordish race doesn't exist? Actually you react like you're having a fit. That psychopath laugh gets you every time.   Yeah - because you're standing behind my back listening to it. I never mentioned race. I mentioned ethnicity. Proof again you are obsessed. Funnier that you equate it with ethnicity! You really know the Y-Chromosome history of Europe! -- Posted by drkberry at 7:12 pm on Dec. 4, 2008 Stop spreading your hateful racist propoganda....you're trying to recruit people to your hitlernism ways..kidd runne. -- Posted by kidd rune at 2:35 pm on Dec. 5, 2008 Stop spreading your hateful racist propoganda There is no hate - just love for my race. you're trying to recruit people to your hitlernism ways..kidd runne Not really. Why would I be arguing with Jake - he is of no use to Whites - he can't reproduce them. -- Posted by drkberry at 3:52 pm on Dec. 5, 2008 Your stupid and so are your views, the power of the white man is over. Get over it! -- Posted by kidd rune at 4:49 pm on Dec. 5, 2008 Your stupid and so are your views, the power of the white man is over. Get over it!   What do you mean "Power of the White man"? What do you think my views are? What power are you speaking of that you claim I want back? The power of existence? I don't see it as power - but as a humane right. -- Posted by drkberry at 5:58 pm on Dec. 5, 2008 You're living and not in some prison camp, that should be enough human rights. -- Posted by kidd rune at 6:03 pm on Dec. 5, 2008 Quote: from drkberry at 8:58 pm on Dec. 5, 2008 You're living and not in some prison camp, that should be enough human rights. I said HUMANE right - not human. -- Posted by GoloSLB at 7:55 pm on Dec. 5, 2008 *is a European Muslim* Do you mean like Albania and Germany and England and France and Bosnia? -- Posted by jakelong at 6:03 am on Dec. 6, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 2:35 pm on Dec. 5, 2008 There is no hate - just love for my race. How is depriving whites of the company of nonwhites "love"? You never think that maybe whites BENEFIT from nonwhites? After all they benefitted from slaves and chinese labor. These days they benefit from trade with China and Mexico and philippines and vietnam. They benefit from nonwhite investment. They benefit from high-tech geniuses from India and China. You don't think that many whites LOVE nonwhites?That many whites are FRIENDS with nonwhites? But you want them to seperate from them. In fact you might be harming many whites by wanting to segregate them from nonwhites. Thats not loving whites at all! Why would I be arguing with Jake - he is of no use to Whites - he can't reproduce them. You know you can't recruit me. Most of the time you don't really argue with me. You just argue. You just go in circles. Maybe you argue so you can spread more shit. Maybe you argue so you can recruit Bud2400 and a few others. Who knows. -- Posted by kidd rune at 12:02 pm on Dec. 6, 2008 How is depriving whites of the company of nonwhites "love"? You wouldn't be. You'd be giving them a CHOICE to live with only Whites. Visiting nonWhites is an option - living with nonWhites is an option. You never think that maybe whites BENEFIT from nonwhites? After all they benefitted from slaves and chinese labor. These days they benefit from trade with China and Mexico and philippines and vietnam. They benefit from nonwhite investment. They benefit from high-tech geniuses from India and China. Maybe if Whites bettered themselves they would benefit from each other. Whites may benefit from nonWhites in some ways - but it's hurting them in other ways too. And slavery isn't going to return =P You know you can't recruit me. Most of the time you don't really argue with me. You just argue. You just go in circles. Maybe you argue so you can spread more shit. Maybe you argue so you can recruit Bud2400 and a few others. Who knows. Why the hell would I want to 'Recruit' you? I don't want to 'Recruit' anyone! -- Posted by jakelong at 2:05 pm on Dec. 6, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 12:02 pm on Dec. 6, 2008 Visiting nonWhites is an option - living with nonWhites is an option. But not in "your" country. Maybe if Whites bettered themselves they would benefit from each other. Maybe they already have for centuries and getting different ideas from other ppl outside that group is a good thing? Whites may benefit from nonWhites in some ways - but it's hurting them in other ways too. And vice-versa. Everything has pros and cons. Thats life. And slavery isn't going to return =P Oh is that the only ways whites can benefit from nonwhites? Why the hell would I want to 'Recruit' you? I don't want to 'Recruit' anyone! Is that why you've become bud's MSN buddy even though he is totally for integration and against segregation? Is that why many of your early posts were total propaganda copypasta without any quotes? -- Posted by kidd rune at 4:52 pm on Dec. 6, 2008 But not in "your" country. Where did you get this information? NOBODY would be forced to live in a White country. NOBODY, if already a resident, would be forced to stay in that country. NOBODY would be told they couldn't visit the country unless they have obvious criminal records or something similar. Maybe they already have for centuries and getting different ideas from other ppl outside that group is a good thing? Maybe, maybe, maybe. Maybe some Whites can go live with nonWhites and benefit from them so much and become so awesome like you say they will be - and the racist KKK Nazi KKK Supremacists can live in their own country without anyone but Whites? Why do you want racist KKK Nazis in your country anyway? And vice-versa. Everything has pros and cons. Thats life. The goal is to find more pros and less cons. Oh is that the only ways whites can benefit from nonwhites? You mentioned it which was why I said that. Is that why you've become bud's MSN buddy even though he is totally for integration and against segregation? No. Is that why many of your early posts were total propaganda copypasta without any quotes? No. -- Posted by drkberry at 9:58 pm on Dec. 6, 2008 Many WH don't see it your way, they want to rid of nonwhites in all nowhite territories..not just Europe, which i think is messed up considering that their ancestors were the ones that emigrated away from europe. -- Posted by jakelong at 2:34 am on Dec. 7, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 4:52 pm on Dec. 6, 2008 NOBODY would be forced to live in a White country. But once they live IN YOUR country they can't marry nonwhites or live with them even if they choose to.   Maybe some Whites can go live with nonWhites and benefit from them so much and become so awesome like you say they will be Yep and They already have. Often. many times.   - and the racist KKK Nazi KKK Supremacists can live in their own country without anyone but Whites?   Sure they can. So long as they don't change MY country into theirs. Why do you want racist KKK Nazis in your country anyway?  I really don't and you're welcome to leave anytime. I just wanted you to admit what you were. Good job doing that. The goal is to find more pros and less cons.  Always. And the trick is to realize that there's more pros than cons when nonwhites are around.    You mentioned it which was why I said that.  But you can't see other benefits?   Is that why many of your early posts were total propaganda copypasta without any quotes? No.   No what? No that's not why or   No you didn't post copypasta and plagiarized work without giving sources or quote? -- Posted by kidd rune at 8:44 am on Dec. 7, 2008 Many WH don't see it your way, they want to rid of nonwhites in all nowhite territories..not just Europe, which i think is messed up considering that their ancestors were the ones that emigrated away from europe. And I care why? There are people that believe all Whites should be killed in genocide. There are people that think the same for Jews, Hispanics, and Blacks. Why do I care as long as they don't do it? But once they live IN YOUR country they can't marry nonwhites or live with them even if they choose to. If they wanted to do it they could leave the country and do it. We're not depriving them of anything - we're just saying "You can't do this here - so if you want to do that go somewhere else." Somewhat like a forum. Keep topics about race in the race forum or they get taken out. Yep and They already have. Often. many times.   If you say so - why not let Whites not benefit from them. It's their loss. Why are you so opposed to a nation for Whites? Sure they can. So long as they don't change MY country into theirs. So you're saying a White nation can go ahead and exist as long as you don't get fucked over because of it?  I really don't and you're welcome to leave anytime. I just wanted you to admit what you were. Good job doing that.   What all-White (preferably National Socialist) nation can I go to? Always. And the trick is to realize that there's more pros than cons when nonwhites are around. I've seen more cons than pros.  But you can't see other benefits? Universal benefits? Nope. No what? No that's not why or   No you didn't post copypasta and plagiarized work without giving sources or quote? Well I didn't plagiarize as I never said I wrote it - and I didn't know about the quote rule. Nor did I have any intent to 'Recruit' anyone. -- Posted by drkberry at 12:00 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 Then Europeans should've never colonized nonwhite territories...britain in china  whites in australia, whites in hawaii, spaniards in the phillippines, whites in america, dutch in indonesia...the list goes on and on. You're white nationalist motto...whites for white lands...well then what the fuck are whites trying to colonize nonwhite nations...you're WNantionalists are a bunch of hypocrites -- Posted by kidd rune at 1:27 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 You're white nationalist motto...whites for white lands...well then what the fuck are whites trying to colonize nonwhite nations I don't recall going to another country and colonizing it - do you think I have? ...you're WNantionalists are a bunch of hypocrites How many WN's actually did that? Just because they were WHITE doesn't mean they were White Nationalists. -- Posted by drkberry at 3:19 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 The WN's are untrustworthy, they say they want back their european land and then after that, they will try to dominate the world like their ancestors did. Go visit stromfront...they are sick bastards and think they are superior to nonwhites. -- Posted by kidd rune at 4:08 pm on Dec. 7, 2008 then after that, they will try to dominate the world like their ancestors did. Prove it. Go visit stromfront...they are sick bastards and think they are superior to nonwhites. I've been there and only some - not all - believe that. But, then again. Ethnocentrism was universal until recently. It's one thing to think you're better living with other races - but if you're living with your own race it shouldn't matter. -- Posted by jakelong at 8:45 pm on Dec. 8, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 8:44 am on Dec. 7, 2008 And I care why? because they are part of your group. Or wait are you STILL a WN or you moved totally in NS Why do I care as long as they don't do it? Because one day they might do it.   If they wanted to do it they could leave the country and do it. Thats what you call being for whites?   We're not depriving them of anything - we're just saying "You can't do this here - so if you want to do that go somewhere else." That's depriving them. If you go to a deserted island and invite whites and tell them thats the law is one thing. But ther's not a lot of deserted islands left to do that. To make YOUR WN country you will hav to 1. exile nonwhites from that country even its only 5% of the existing country 2. Force whites to obey your new law or leave the country in which they were born Somewhat like a forum. Keep topics about race in the race forum or they get taken out. Except that many topics aren't PURELY race or PURELY politics. May of the topics we cover could belong in both or either. they are MIXED !!! -- Posted by jakelong at 8:53 pm on Dec. 8, 2008 Quote: from kidd rune at 8:44 am on Dec. 7, 2008 So you're saying a White nation can go ahead and exist as long as you don't get fucked over because of it? And other ppl in existing countries don't either. If you start chasing away  thousands of nonwhites from an existing country you will be guilty of ethnic cleansing, What all-White (preferably National Socialist) nation can I go to? Answer that question yourself. I don't care. I've seen more cons than pros. Of course you would. Well I didn't plagiarize as I never said I wrote it You plagiarize because you passed it as your own WITHOUT quoting your sources. Any 5th grader knows that, You don't have to claim something as your own to plagiarize. All you have to do is FAIL to QUOTE and give source for your quote. Which is what you did over and over. and I didn't know about the quote rule. Its common sense as you like to say... Nor did I have any intent to 'Recruit' anyone. we'll see about that. Pages: 1 2 3  Next