-- Posted by GeneCosta at 9:49 am on Jan. 1, 2009 So, does anyone here write their poems with meter in mind? I'm not one of those "elitist" pricks who thinks poetry without meter isn't poetry at all, but a lot of the submissions here do fit the "teenage emo" category. -- Posted by Hropkey at 9:51 am on Jan. 1, 2009 I sometimes write with meter; it depends on what I'm writing. -- Posted by HuffleHaire at 9:59 am on Jan. 1, 2009 Sometimes, not always -- Posted by Kaijuu at 10:00 am on Jan. 1, 2009 whats a meter? -- Posted by GeneCosta at 8:00 pm on Jan. 2, 2009 Meter is the method from which most of poetry originated. It's based in a language's stress. English is fickle because we're a hodge-podge of Germanic languages and French - most other languages have an easier way to recognize the stress. In poetry with meter, you cannot deviate (much) from a pattern. This formula "strengthens" the voice. For example, Shakespeare wrote all of his works in near-perfect meter. That's partially what makes him great. Writing in meter is laborious, and not until the 19th century did poets truly leave it for less formulaic works. Take the following line. It's one of Shakespeare's famous lines. I'm going to capitalize the stressed syllables:   ...a HORSE, a HORSE! my KINGdom FOR a HORSE!... The problem with teenage poets is that they don't even acknowledge meter. Even a poet who doesn't confine his/her poems to meter should first understand and be capable of keeping the human ear pacified, otherwise your voice tends to end up like crap. That's partially why "emo poetry" is looked down upon - the authors don't know shit about meter. That, and they also don't invoke any emotions. It's just ranting.