-- Posted by JasonHot at 8:44 am on Jan. 3, 2009 like i was always told the rhyme to pick sumbody went like this: "eeny meeny miney moe catch a tiger by the toe if he hollers let him go eeny meeny miney moe" my grandpa says that it used to be "eeny meeny miney moe catch a nigger by the toe if he hollers let him go eeny meeny miney moe" WTF that makes more sense cuz tigers dont got toes.  LOL.  so wats the truth about all this? -- Posted by Manipulative Acid at 8:45 am on Jan. 3, 2009 It's not don't got. It's don't have. -- Posted by Points at 8:46 am on Jan. 3, 2009 Wasn't it "catch a baby by the toe"? -- Posted by rileyy at 8:46 am on Jan. 3, 2009 I just play rock-paper-scissors lol -- Posted by bloodyXkisses at 8:47 am on Jan. 3, 2009 Tigers do too have toes. I always said tiger too... But i've heard the nigger one. -- Posted by jashj at 8:47 am on Jan. 3, 2009 its like agatha christies novel. It was first: 10 little nigger, and then was changed to: Ten little indians, and after that, to: and then there were none. Long ago white people were "allowed" to say nigger. Those were sad times. -- Posted by JasonHot at 8:48 am on Jan. 3, 2009 Quote: from bloodyXkisses at 11:47 am on Jan. 3, 2009 Tigers do too have toes.   I always said tiger too...   But i've heard the nigger one. i thought tigers have claws, not toes -- niggers have toes, not claws. -- Posted by Weakerthan at 8:52 am on Jan. 3, 2009 They are all confusing, because they have been modified because of misinterpretation and censorship. Ring around the rosie was some sort of death spin, at one point in history. Children would sing it before they would die of the plague.