Pages: 1 2  Next -- Posted by Anonymous at 8:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 I mean, it's not like the foreskin is an extremely sensitive part of the body. Besides, it's not like they'll even miss is that much, as it doesn't really do much. Yet every time people make a topic about it here, they're like "I'd never mutilate my child's genitals." First off, fuckface, you aren't the one doing it (in most cases). Second, it's not mutilation or anything. Mutilation would be like cutting it in half or something else really unorthodox and painful. It doesn't even bleed when you get circumcised or anything, it's not like it's inflicting a major wound. The only kind of circumcision you should be against is the female type. -- Posted by sub800 at 8:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 WHO CARES DO WHAT YOU WANT IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER FOCK -- Posted by danndivision at 8:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 because id rather not have some dude cut the skin off of my wanker -- Posted by fezzy at 8:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Who here is against circumcision? Personally, I think it's good. And not just because it's required by my religion. -- Posted by asia lover at 8:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Anonymous FAIL -- Posted by Joke at 8:23 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 oh, point takin. -- Posted by theboxman at 8:23 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 you are an idiot.  There are a ton of nerve endings in the foreskin -- Posted by akSamiRae at 8:23 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Wtf is female circumsision? -- Posted by marilyns baby at 8:23 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 I'm all for circumcsion because not doing it can make a guy have infections when they're older and i just prefer it generally. -- Posted by blackbandaid at 8:25 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 It actually has been shown to greatly reduce sexual pleasure for a man. Due to the fact that the mucus on the head has to thicken dramatically to protect itself. There is no skin on the head and it contains a lot of nerve endings providing the pleasure. Plus the foreskin rubs up and down over the head during sex/masturbation, protecting it and providing stimulation. THAT is why. -- Posted by telomere13 at 8:25 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from Anonymous at 11:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 I mean, it's not like the foreskin is an extremely sensitive part of the body. False. Besides, it's not like they'll even miss is that much, as it doesn't really do much. In most cases it completely eliminates the need for any kind of lubricant among other things. It doesn't even bleed when you get circumcised or anything, it's not like it's inflicting a major wound. Doesn't bleed?  Why on earth would you believe something as ridiculous as that; of course it bleeds.  It also hurts a great deal, but most people don't remember this because they were young when it happened. -- Posted by blufindr at 8:25 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 It's none of my business. I hold no opinion on the matter. That being said, I wouldn't get my sons circumcized. -- Posted by forfallonyy at 8:26 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from asia lover at 1:22 am on Jan. 13, 2009 Anonymous FAIL agree -- Posted by Anonymous at 8:26 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 If you are circumcised you have sex and you're like ohh. If you're not your like OHHHHHHHH!!!!!! -- Posted by Sarge at 8:27 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 I'm rather pissed off that part of my dick was cut off without my consent or knowledge when I was only an infant. If you're gonna get cut, it should be your goddamn choice. -- Posted by Trendz at 8:29 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 What are the reasons that people say it's bad? -- Posted by Tavis at 8:30 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from danndivision at 11:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 because id rather not have some dude cut the skin off of my wanker And you will clearly remember this at the age of 1, and will then oppose it even though it has happened? It is not demeening in any way or anything. It is simply just removing extra skin post-birth. -- Posted by whoisabs at 8:33 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from Tavis at 8:30 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from danndivision at 11:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 because id rather not have some dude cut the skin off of my wanker And you will clearly remember this at the age of 1, and will then oppose it even though it has happened? It is not demeening in any way or anything. It is simply just removing extra skin post-birth. tell that to your daughters and make sure to remember their extra skin too -- Posted by Tavis at 8:36 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from whoisabs at 11:33 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from Tavis at 8:30 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from danndivision at 11:22 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 because id rather not have some dude cut the skin off of my wanker    And you will clearly remember this at the age of 1, and will then oppose it even though it has happened?    It is not demeening in any way or anything. It is simply just removing extra skin post-birth. tell that to your daughters and make sure to remember their extra skin too I'm talking about male circumcision only. I am against female just as the OP. -- Posted by whoisabs at 8:37 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 If it is good enough for your sons to have their 'extra skin' removed, then it should be good enough for your daughters. Try failing harder sexist. -- Posted by Tavis at 8:45 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from whoisabs at 11:37 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 If it is good enough for your sons to have their 'extra skin' removed, then it should be good enough for your daughters. Try failing harder sexist. In calling me sexist you are calling tradition sexist. It has been tradition for the western civilization to circumcise their men, and not nearly so much their women. -- Posted by HowAboutsNo at 9:48 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 hmm yes, well female circumcision i believe inclused removing the clirtoris in which is COMPLETELY different from male circumcision. male circumcision i believe is bad because I have been lead to believe they lose sensitivity. there was a male member on here who was circumcised and hated it because it rubbed against his trousers and the skin became tougher. so i say no to circumcision all together. -- Posted by LoveKay at 10:31 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 I am not against it. I don't ever remember hearing or reading about someone who is. Most people feel weird about it, actually, as far as I am concerned. -- Posted by Kristal19 at 11:31 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 FIRST OFF FUCK FACE, GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. THEIR ARE ACTUALLY NERVES IN THE FORESKIN. I PREFER NOT TO DATE A CUT GUY IF I HAD THE CHOICE. BUT I'M NOT GOING TO LEAVE A GUY BECAUSE HE'S CUT, BUT IT IS PENIS MUTILATION WHETHER YOU BELIEVE IT OR NOT, AND A CUT DICK IS BORING AS HELL TO PLAY WITH AND THEIR NO FUN BECAUSE THERE IS NO EXTRA TO PLAY WITH, AND THE FORESKIN GIVES ME SENSATION A CUT GUY JUST CAN'T GIVE. READ THIS ARTICLE I FOUND YOU DUMB FUCK! A study published three weeks ago in the British Journal of Urology found that circumcision decreases the sensitivity of the penis by as much as 75%. So much sensitivity is lost as a result of circumcision because the foreskin is the most richly innervated part of the penis. It has the greatest number of nerve receptors as well as the greatest variety of nerve receptors. After circumcision, the glans of the penis is the only area that is able to be stumilated, and it gets dull and calloused over the the course of a man's life from constant abrasion and rubbing. The glans is pressure sensitive. It can only be aroused by pressure onto it or from within it. The foreskin is touch sensitive and it recieves stimulation like the fingertips and lips. Because circumcised men have lost all of the touch sensitive tissue of their penis, their sensation-capability is dramatically reduced. Let the choice be made by your son, whose body it is, whose penis it is, whose sex life it will be. Wouldn't you want your glans covered, so that it you avoid unwanted stimulation throughout life? The glans is designed to be exposed only when the penis is erect. When it's not erect, it's "put away". Imagine how angering it would be to have to live with a sex organ whose sensitivity level is less that what it was designed to be and your own parents decreased the level of sensitivity. Make no mistake about it: there is only loss in circumcision. -- Posted by islandgirl at 11:36 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 I like uncut dicks. I think it's stupid to say 'oh it's extra skin you should remove it' a) It's not like it's harmful to have a foreskin. That's like removing your appendix at birth because there's no point in it. Hey- you don't really need earlobes either! b) There are nerve endings. It is highly sensitive c) The foreskin protects the head of the penis I'm not rioting in the streets over it because imo it's not a huge problem and not a major public health issue (like female circ) mainly due to the safe conditions that it's done under, but I wouldn't get my son cut if I had one. -- Posted by Anonymous at 11:59 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 Quote: from marilyns baby at 8:23 pm on Jan. 12, 2009 I'm all for circumcsion because not doing it can make a guy have infections when they're older and i just prefer it generally. Wow it's amazing to me that you know so much about the penis but yet you do not have one. I have had one my whole life, an uncut dick. The all american natural uncut dick! I have had sex with 5 girls, got head from like 10 girls in my sex life, and had anal sex with 4 girls. And I never wore a condom with the anal sex, so you would think I would have definitely got an infection right? Wrong, you don't know shit, you don't have a penis, you just have to go by with what you read because you don't have one. The anal area has lots of bacteria, but guess what? I never got no infections. I took a shower later that night and I never noticed a thing! I have never in my life had these infections you talk about. Some of the girls thought I was cut when I showed them my dick when I went to fuck them. They swore up and down I was cut, so I showed them my dick when I wasn't hard one time and they were suprised to see I wasn't. Uncut is no more dirty that cut, both dicks require washing. So what your saying is you would suck a cut dick even though the guy hasn't washed his dick in a couple weeks? I wash my dick everytime I take a shower, and it never smells, it never gets infected, and I never had no problems with my dick ever. So is it ok for a cut guy to fuck a girl up the ass without a condom and not wash his dick afterwards just because he's cut? What if a week goes by and he still never showered? So because he's cut his dick is self cleaning and wont get infected? Ha yeah ok, he will be at risk for an infection too, cut or not, bacteria can affect us all. Being cut fucks up a man's sensitivity, and it's mutilation. Sometimes there are medical reasons to get cut, but just to cut it for the pure purpose to make it easier to clean is nonsense. So should we shop our toes off too so it makes it easier to clean our feet? We wouldn't have to clean inbetween our toes if we had no toes, so that would make it cleaner! If somebody is too fuckin lazy to wash their own dick, then that is their problem, it's those kinda people who give the rest of the uncut normal guys a bad name. Girls can get vaginal infections too, and if you didn't shower for months I'm sure you would develop infections in the puss too. Infections occur because bacteria, bacteria is killed when you take proper steps to wash yourself. So I'm thinking about going to the denist and having my teeth removed from my mouth. So now I don't have to brush my teeth anymore! Yay that is so much cleaner! I don't have to stress on cavaties anymore! I can buy dentures! Way less up keep and I don't have to worry about cavaties because I have no more teeth! I'm going to the barber next week to shave my head completely bald. This way it's much cleaner and less up keep! I wont be at risk for lice, and I wont have to worry about that nasty dandruff anymore! So much cleaner! Maybe girls should shave their head too! They wont have to be in the bathroom for hours taking up all kinds of time to do their hair! Makes it simple and like I said less up keep! This can be said about getting your dick cut. Sure getting it cut means you don't have to wash it, but do you really want to suck on a cut dick that has not been washed? Do you really want to suck off some dude who just played football in 100 degree weather? Cut or not, the dick needs to be washed! Just because it's uncut of cut, doesn't make a difference. Yes uncut needs to be washed, but a sweaty cut dick needs to be washed too. There are a couple guys I know who are cut who have had plenty of infections down there because their too athletic and don't use the common sense of proper hygiene. But really, how hard is it to wash a dick? Cut or uncut washing a dick should be part of your shower routine. Just because someone is cut, that's no exuse to have a dirty dick! Uncut needs to be washed more frequently, but taking a shower everyday is plent of hygiene, because like I said, washing my uncut dick is a daily routine to me in the shower, just like brushing my teeth is an everyday thing too. If your too lazy to keep yourself up to date and clean, then become a smelly ass homeless bum! -- Posted by Anonymous at 12:10 am on Jan. 13, 2009 CHOP! NOT SHOP. *CHOP* -- Posted by Anonymous at 12:14 am on Jan. 13, 2009 Just because it's uncut of cut, CORRECTION JUST BECAUSE IT'S UNCUT OR CUT Some of you losers may bag on my spelling. When someone says something in these posters that other people don't like, the spelling is the first thing some of you losers make fun of. Does it make you feel tuff to make fun of someone cause they mistyped? -- Posted by biflexible at 1:16 am on Jan. 13, 2009 It's a disgrace that parents/guardians are permitted to have a boy infant circumcised for non-medical reasons (and by that, I don't mean your pseudo medical crap that is not applicable in the west). Disgusting that parents/guardians feel they have the right to mutilate a child under their protection. -- Posted by MoZ at 2:27 am on Jan. 13, 2009 oh for gods sake. If any religion wanted circumsision - surely we would be born without them. Its part of a male body, and therefore shouldnt be cut off for cosmetic purposes. Pages: 1 2  Next