-- Posted by K r e s c e n d o at 12:05 pm on July 3, 2009 Actually. If you think about it, it kind of is. -- Posted by DaisyMontana at 12:06 pm on July 3, 2009 No, it's visual desired. -- Posted by tearsofyourenemy at 12:06 pm on July 3, 2009 depends on the type of porn -- Posted by derailedjet at 12:07 pm on July 3, 2009 Yeah. It's pretty artistic. A porno is a fucked up, vulgar Picaso, much like a "real" Hollywood film is like a still-life portrait. -- Posted by soccerislife at 12:07 pm on July 3, 2009 hhahah sure. -- Posted by K r e s c e n d o at 12:08 pm on July 3, 2009 Quote: from derailedjet at 8:07 pm on July 3, 2009 Yeah. It's pretty artistic. A porno is a fucked up, vulgar Picaso, much like a "real" Hollywood film is like a still-life portrait. True. -- Posted by telomere13 at 12:13 pm on July 3, 2009 I'm pretty sure that in the United States one of the legal distinctions between pornography (legal) and obscenity (illegal) is "artistic merit" although this is used rather loosely.   -- Posted by Baron Samedi at 12:15 pm on July 3, 2009 Totally.