-- Posted by the raven at 7:29 pm on July 4, 2009 only smaller and coloured to fit arthas' patterns. -- Posted by alli wonderland at 7:31 pm on July 4, 2009 tattoos make my stomach hurt, especially when they're red like that. -- Posted by Lally at 7:33 pm on July 4, 2009 that person's arm looks irritated. -- Posted by metacarPi at 7:33 pm on July 4, 2009 aww that IS cute :) I'm getting my dogs paw print tattooed :D -- Posted by metacarPi at 7:34 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from Lallypop at 10:33 pm on July 4, 2009 that person's arm looks irritated. It's a leg. -- Posted by the raven at 7:35 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from Metacarpi at 10:34 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from Lallypop at 10:33 pm on July 4, 2009 that person's arm looks irritated.     It's a leg. mhm, plus it's very fresh. -- Posted by addicted to girls at 7:37 pm on July 4, 2009 cool -- Posted by ItsEllaYeah at 7:46 pm on July 4, 2009 That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller. But would you it in the same place? -- Posted by the raven at 7:50 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:46 pm on July 4, 2009 That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller. But would you it in the same place? i'd rather have it on my side just up under my arm, more towards my back. -- Posted by ItsEllaYeah at 7:53 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from The Raven at 3:50 am on July 5, 2009 Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:46 pm on July 4, 2009 That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller.    But would you it in the same place? i'd rather have it on my side just up under my arm, more towards my back. Ooh I think I get where you mean. A lot of people are having tattoo's done on their side these days =\. But I think that'd look nice though, it'd be easier to cover up than if you had it on your leg! -- Posted by the raven at 7:55 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:53 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from The Raven at 3:50 am on July 5, 2009 Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:46 pm on July 4, 2009 That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller.   But would you it in the same place?    i'd rather have it on my side just up under my arm, more towards my back. Ooh I think I get where you mean. A lot of people are having tattoo's done on their side these days =\. But I think that'd look nice though, it'd be easier to cover up than if you had it on your leg! yeah plus i have really thin legs and i just can't picture getting much done there, it'd look retarded it'd have to be so small unless i got it on my thigh. -- Posted by ItsEllaYeah at 8:02 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from The Raven at 3:55 am on July 5, 2009 Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:53 pm on July 4, 2009 Quote: from The Raven at 3:50 am on July 5, 2009 Quote: from ItsEllaYeah at 10:46 pm on July 4, 2009 That'd be a lot more attractive if it was smaller.       But would you it in the same place?   i'd rather have it on my side just up under my arm, more towards my back.    Ooh I think I get where you mean.    A lot of people are having tattoo's done on their side these days =\.    But I think that'd look nice though, it'd be easier to cover up than if you had it on your leg! yeah plus i have really thin legs and i just can't picture getting much done there, it'd look retarded it'd have to be so small unless i got it on my thigh. Yeah whoever that is does have chunky legs. I think where you're talking about would be nice, but it'd be painful, it's on a lot of bone.