-- Posted by Mods1Blow2Me3Daily at 8:06 pm on July 9, 2009 lifeful. does this word exist? -- Posted by DaisyMontana at 8:07 pm on July 9, 2009 It does. -- Posted by 1deep at 8:07 pm on July 9, 2009 yeah,it means full of life -- Posted by devilmaycrydude at 8:07 pm on July 9, 2009 daisymontana? -- Posted by Baron Samedi at 8:07 pm on July 9, 2009 Not according to spell-check, it doesn't. -- Posted by Fauna at 8:08 pm on July 9, 2009 yes. even if it wasn't technically a word, it's a pretty obvious and legitimate coinage. -- Posted by DaisyMontana at 8:08 pm on July 9, 2009 Quote: from famous187 at 11:07 pm on July 9, 2009 yeah,it means full of life You're smart -- Posted by utheh at 8:08 pm on July 9, 2009 Quote: from Fauna at 9:08 pm on July 9, 2009 yes. even if it wasn't technically a word, it's a pretty obvious and legitimate coinage. this -- Posted by coffee brown at 8:08 pm on July 9, 2009 no, thats not a word.  im russian, and even i know that. -- Posted by carelesmind at 8:09 pm on July 9, 2009 Quote: from Fauna at 8:08 pm on July 9, 2009 yes. even if it wasn't technically a word, it's a pretty obvious and legitimate coinage. your word trickery confuses me, jk, i get it :) -- Posted by SomeRandomKid at 8:15 pm on July 9, 2009 technically. no? -- Posted by Fauna at 8:17 pm on July 9, 2009 Quote: from coffee brown at 4:08 am on July 10, 2009 no, thats not a word.  im russian, and even i know that. you're a russian who doesn't read enough spenser then, or enough books on basic punctuation apparently. anyway, what's wrong with making up words? If "lifeful" expresses what you want to say better than "vital" or "lively", then why not use lifeful? It seems perfectly good to me. english is a complete mongrel language, so I don't see what's wrong with individuals throwing their own ideas into the mix if they so feel like it.