-- Posted by devilmaycrydude at 7:59 am on July 10, 2009 at the end of the game do you have to stop playing or can you just roam the city being badass? please tell me.   -- Posted by An Young Guy at 8:00 am on July 10, 2009 I don't know. Didn't beat it yet. I'll tell you when I do. -- Posted by Milky Way kid at 8:00 am on July 10, 2009 i think you can roam the streets but like spidder man it will get boring XD -- Posted by devilmaycrydude at 8:01 am on July 10, 2009 c'mon i know someone must have it and be done with it. -- Posted by Randomaster at 8:01 am on July 10, 2009 are the graphics as good as people say? Because I saw the screencaps on steam, and to be honest the graphics sucked. Like GTA 3 Suck. -- Posted by Banana KC at 8:01 am on July 10, 2009 I'm not sure. I'm barely past the part where you have to break into the military base and kill those monster-dudes. Keep in mind, I'm starting a new game soon so I can really learn the storyline. My friend was over when I was playing and he, being the idiot he is, skipped all of the cinematics when possible. -- Posted by TheUnstoppableScentz at 8:02 am on July 10, 2009 The game sucks. Moar repetitive than a person who stutters. Edit: Typo :x -- Posted by An Young Guy at 8:02 am on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Randomaster at 11:01 am on July 10, 2009 are the graphics as good as people say? Because I saw the screencaps on steam, and to be honest the graphics sucked. Like GTA 3 Suck. The graphics suck. -- Posted by Psycloner at 8:03 am on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Randomaster at 8:01 am on July 10, 2009 are the graphics as good as people say? Because I saw the screencaps on steam, and to be honest the graphics sucked. Like GTA 3 Suck. GTA 3 graphics were good ages ago but yeah, in commparison to games like TW: Empire, Farcry 2, CoD 4, etc... that would be crap although for a game with art like that, I would've thought they be good... was thinking of getting it too. -- Posted by Mikoto at 8:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad. I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. -- Posted by An Young Guy at 8:18 am on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad. I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. The graphics are last generation. -- Posted by Mikoto at 8:54 am on July 10, 2009 Quote: from An Young Guy at 4:18 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad.    I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. The graphics are last generation. lolwut last generation? not really... -- Posted by Banana KC at 8:55 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics are pretty sexy, even on lowest detail (seeing as that's all I can play on for now.. Damn video card fried.) -- Posted by An Young Guy at 9:06 am on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:54 am on July 10, 2009 Quote: from An Young Guy at 4:18 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad.   I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. The graphics are last generation. lolwut last generation? not really... Yeah, last gen, like I said. -- Posted by allsmiles at 12:28 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 4:54 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from An Young Guy at 4:18 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad.   I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. The graphics are last generation. lolwut last generation? not really... Low poly, low res texturing, not particularly good bumpmapping... it's definitely not up to par with current standards. -- Posted by White Fate at 2:24 pm on July 10, 2009 The graphics for Prototype are BETTER than some of the "next gen" games for the 360. -- Posted by NEGATIVE0 at 3:01 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from allsmiles at 4:28 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 4:54 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from An Young Guy at 4:18 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad.       I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. The graphics are last generation.    lolwut    last generation? not really... Low poly, low res texturing, not particularly good bumpmapping... it's definitely not up to par with current standards. considering the amount of shit on screen at once, and how consistent the frame rate is, you have to understand that the hardware of the 360 isn't limitless in power, neither are the engines it can support. -- Posted by allsmiles at 3:57 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from NEGATIVE0 at 11:01 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from allsmiles at 4:28 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 4:54 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from An Young Guy at 4:18 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad.    I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. The graphics are last generation.   lolwut   last generation? not really...    Low poly, low res texturing, not particularly good bumpmapping... it's definitely not up to par with current standards. considering the amount of shit on screen at once, and how consistent the frame rate is, you have to understand that the hardware of the 360 isn't limitless in power, neither are the engines it can support. I dunno what FPS it pulls off, I'm guessing 60 at 720p... It could've been better. Other games have demonstrated this. -- Posted by NEGATIVE0 at 6:18 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from allsmiles at 7:57 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from NEGATIVE0 at 11:01 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from allsmiles at 4:28 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 4:54 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from An Young Guy at 4:18 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad.           I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. The graphics are last generation.       lolwut       last generation? not really...   Low poly, low res texturing, not particularly good bumpmapping... it's definitely not up to par with current standards.    considering the amount of shit on screen at once, and how consistent the frame rate is, you have to understand that the hardware of the 360 isn't limitless in power, neither are the engines it can support. I dunno what FPS it pulls off, I'm guessing 60 at 720p... It could've been better. Other games have demonstrated this. such as? -- Posted by allsmiles at 3:38 pm on July 14, 2009 Quote: from NEGATIVE0 at 2:18 am on July 11, 2009 Quote: from allsmiles at 7:57 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from NEGATIVE0 at 11:01 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from allsmiles at 4:28 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 4:54 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from An Young Guy at 4:18 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Mikoto at 11:14 am on July 10, 2009 The graphics aren't bad.     I dunno about the original question though, I haven't completed it yet. The graphics are last generation.    lolwut    last generation? not really...       Low poly, low res texturing, not particularly good bumpmapping... it's definitely not up to par with current standards.   considering the amount of shit on screen at once, and how consistent the frame rate is, you have to understand that the hardware of the 360 isn't limitless in power, neither are the engines it can support.    I dunno what FPS it pulls off, I'm guessing 60 at 720p... It could've been better. Other games have demonstrated this. such as? Well I take what I said back. I just played the game today, and the screenshots don't do it justice. Yes, the textures are still incredibly low res, but I was pulling 60fps (limited by vsync) at 1680x1050 and... well, a lot was going on. The model resolutions on the whole are standard, animation is smooth, the faces are high poly. It's just a shame that the AI is shockingly bad.