-- Posted by iconoclast at 7:21 pm on July 10, 2009 should law enforcement leaders (state police directors, police chiefs,  etc) that VOLUNTARILY take a tough stance on drug enforcement be shot? -- Posted by utheh at 7:21 pm on July 10, 2009 YES -- Posted by Ldzpln at 7:21 pm on July 10, 2009 For the good of drugs, yes. -- Posted by Lucid Nightmare at 7:21 pm on July 10, 2009 Not shot, just stripped of their position. -- Posted by iconoclast at 7:22 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Lucid Nightmare at 10:21 pm on July 10, 2009 Not shot, just stripped of their position. Why not shot for causing immense amounts of pain and suffering? -- Posted by ViLE at 7:22 pm on July 10, 2009 I think they should just legalize the drugs man! -- Posted by Enigma of Eternity at 7:22 pm on July 10, 2009 Nope. I don't think humans should have the right to decide who lives/dies. But then again, it depends if you mean shot = kill OR shot = bullet in foot. -- Posted by iconoclast at 7:23 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Enigma of Eternity at 10:22 pm on July 10, 2009 Nope. I don't think humans should have the right to decide who lives/dies.   But then again, it depends if you mean shot = kill OR shot = bullet in foot. They should at the minimum get a bullet in the foot, and a few years getting fucked up in jail. Better in the head though, because these types are almost never reconcilable. -- Posted by PreppyPeyton at 7:26 pm on July 10, 2009 Yes. -- Posted by Lucid Nightmare at 7:31 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from iconoclast at 7:22 pm on July 10, 2009 Quote: from Lucid Nightmare at 10:21 pm on July 10, 2009 Not shot, just stripped of their position. Why not shot for causing immense amounts of pain and suffering? Because no one deserves to die. Although, if they get shot but don't die, GO FOR IT! -- Posted by Rickenbacker at 11:48 am on July 11, 2009 No. That is a weird question... -- Posted by iconoclast at 11:50 am on July 11, 2009 why is it a weird question they have the option to not take a tough stance and cause more suffering than many rapists and pedophiles -- Posted by theyareAs at 11:58 am on July 11, 2009 Quote: from iconoclast at 1:50 pm on July 11, 2009 why is it a weird question they have the option to not take a tough stance and cause more suffering than many rapists and pedophiles Kid you are really fucked up. I would hate to meet you in real life, learn some values. Causing pain to another for pain that they themselves have caused dosnt solve anything, it only leads to more pain and suffering -- Posted by iconoclast at 12:07 pm on July 11, 2009 Quote: from theyareAs at 2:58 pm on July 11, 2009 Quote: from iconoclast at 1:50 pm on July 11, 2009 why is it a weird question    they have the option to not take a tough stance    and cause more suffering than many rapists and pedophiles Kid you are really fucked up. I would hate to meet you in real life, learn some values. Causing pain to another for pain that they themselves have caused dosnt solve anything, it only leads to more pain and suffering i have better values than you dumbass it would solve something it would make people think twice before doing morally repugnant things ill bet you advocate throwing murderers in jail for life though, because you are a shortsighted prick and only think that people who cause harm that is AGAINST THE LAW and the views of society should be dealt with