-- Posted by Graustein at 11:55 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 PROOF! Discuss Come on guys, I DARE you to prove him wrong -- Posted by Clouse227 at 11:57 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 Arent you the one who also posted on the Holohoax? Maybe I missed something last time, but where exactly are you going with these ummm....hoax topics I guess? =/ -- Posted by Deeznutz FYC at 11:57 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 Why do all nerds have to rebel against EVERYTHING?? -- Posted by Graustein at 11:58 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 Quote: from Clouse227 at 5:57 pm on April 1, 2008 Arent you the one who also posted on the Holohoax? Maybe I missed something last time, but where exactly are you going with these ummm....hoax topics I guess? =/ I'm doing research on Holohoaxism, and this guy's methods are almost identical to those of Holohoaxists. -- Posted by gothpaegan at 12:00 am on April 1, 2008 weird!!!!!!!!!?????????????!!!!!!!!!!! -- Posted by TechnoShark at 12:02 am on April 1, 2008 LMAO Did anyone go to that link then click on "photographic evidence". The last picture made me laugh sooo hard. I love conspiracy theories. Some are so silly. -- Posted by heyRACH at 12:05 am on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Deeznutz FYC at 11:57 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 Why do all nerds have to rebel against EVERYTHING?? HAHAH. -- Posted by Clouse227 at 12:09 am on April 1, 2008 why do you dare us? Are you researching our reactions to such hoaxes as well? I read on how he said that the moon should be coming crashing down on Earth due to its gravitational pull. I thought scientists said that the moon approached the Earth at an angle, from it side, and was merely caught in the pull and the force made it spin in orbit. Im probably expalining wrong, but yeah. Also, wouldnt there be absolutely no moon light if there was no moon for the light to reflect of? Sorry if the guy addressed these points already. I didnt even read much in the link. -- Posted by Ethryx at 12:15 am on April 1, 2008 Well there goes this whole firms claims http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/743469.stm -- Posted by Graustein at 12:15 am on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Clouse227 at 6:09 pm on April 1, 2008 why do you dare us? Are you researching our reactions to such hoaxes as well? I read on how he said that the moon should be coming crashing down on Earth due to its gravitational pull. I thought scientists said that the moon approached the Earth at an angle, from it side, and was merely caught in the pull and the force made it spin in orbit. Im probably expalining wrong, but yeah. Also, wouldnt there be absolutely no moon light if there was no moon for the light to reflect of? Sorry if the guy addressed these points already. I didnt even read much in the link. I dare you for emphasis :P I'm not researching your reactions per se, but people like to rise to a challenge with better and more interesting arguments. His objection to the first point is that you can't trust scientists. After all, they're the ones perpetuating the conspiracy. His answer to the second one is that its artificially created. What we see in the sky is actually a hologram or giant weather balloon or something. -- Posted by Will Smith at 12:20 am on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Graustein at 11:55 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 PROOF! Discuss Come on guys, I DARE you to prove him wrong I DARE you to prove him correct.   -- Posted by Graustein at 12:24 am on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Will Smith at 6:20 pm on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Graustein at 11:55 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 PROOF!    Discuss    Come on guys, I DARE you to prove him wrong I DARE you to prove him correct.   Why should I? He's doing a pretty good job on his own. -- Posted by beginner01 at 12:31 am on April 1, 2008 He's going to get washed away by a tidal wave someday. -- Posted by JohnTheNormalOne at 11:17 am on April 3, 2008 If the moon was a helium balloon, then someone would see it from an aircraft or whatever. But, when you are in an aircraft, it seems as distant as if you were on the ground. It can't be in the higher layers of atmosphere because air is too thin there. Anyway, if it was man-made, it would have to be recently created, right? Then explain the fact that people used lunar calendars as far as 3.500 years BC. Also, obviously the moon has a role in eastern religions which were also created well before the modern technology (Islam for example). And in the end, why would anyone spend loads of cash to make a...fake moon?! This is all bunch of bullsh... And the last picture was really LoL. -- Posted by nikki at 8:50 am on April 5, 2008 You seriously think the moon is a hologram? Oh dear. -- Posted by jonny5 at 2:44 pm on April 11, 2008 What about writings about the moon dating back hundreds of years B.C.E. ? -- Posted by Dexter Ward at 12:47 pm on April 13, 2008 The sad thing is I can't tell if people like that are serious or not anymore, look at the flat earth society they actually believe the earth is flat. -- Posted by thepartyboy at 8:50 pm on April 13, 2008 I'm quite sure this is mocking all these losers who claim that the holocaust does not exist, because clearly the moon exists, but even some people managed to believe this nonsense or take it seriously, basically proving the original intention. -- Posted by ToHimWhoDied at 9:03 pm on April 13, 2008 If it's not real, and it nothing more than a balloon or a hologram, then why does NASA have plans to build a moon base in 2020? -- Posted by kendall716 at 6:22 pm on April 14, 2008 What about the early sonnets before electronics that speak of moonlight PROOF. -- Posted by Dont Tell at 6:23 pm on April 14, 2008 DISCLAIMER: All editorial content on this website is strictly not the writer's/author's opinion. THE MAD REVISIONIST, located on the moon, is owned and operated by accident. The content of this page is the copyrighted property of THE MAD REVISIONIST. Any illegal copying or circulating of this page, in whole or in part, without the expressed permission of THE MAD REVISIONIST will be taken as a compliment.  And no, we're not really offering $100,000.  What are you, crazy? Love this Disclaimer they got. -- Posted by kendall716 at 6:29 pm on April 14, 2008 I rofl'd at this: "Women under the influence of the moon": A seventeenth century French drawing Copy/ pasted from his "photography evidence." Because they really had hologram technology in the 17th century. -- Posted by climber783 at 12:17 am on May 1, 2008 Haha, that's an impressively amusing website. -- Posted by FutileRhetoric at 8:37 pm on May 7, 2008 Quote: from Graustein at 12:24 am on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Will Smith at 6:20 pm on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Graustein at 11:55 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 PROOF!     Discuss     Come on guys, I DARE you to prove him wrong    I DARE you to prove him correct.   Why should I? He's doing a pretty good job on his own. Apparently you're as irrational as he is to consider his arguments as logical proof for the moon's nonexistence. -- Posted by Graustein at 12:38 am on May 8, 2008 Quote: from FutileRhetoric at 1:37 pm on May 8, 2008 Quote: from Graustein at 12:24 am on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Will Smith at 6:20 pm on April 1, 2008 Quote: from Graustein at 11:55 pm on Mar. 31, 2008 PROOF!        Discuss        Come on guys, I DARE you to prove him wrong       I DARE you to prove him correct.   Why should I? He's doing a pretty good job on his own.   Apparently you're as irrational as he is to consider his arguments as logical proof for the moon's nonexistence. Apparently you're a complete idiot to miss the fact that it's a satire on Holocaust "revisionists" I mean: DISCLAIMER: All editorial content on this website is strictly not the writer's/author's opinion. THE MAD REVISIONIST, located on the moon, is owned and operated by accident. The content of this page is the copyrighted property of THE MAD REVISIONIST. Any illegal copying or circulating of this page, in whole or in part, without the expressed permission of THE MAD REVISIONIST will be taken as a compliment.  And no, we're not really offering $100,000.  What are you, crazy? -- Posted by FutileRhetoric at 1:03 pm on May 8, 2008 I don't have nearly as much time as you to waste on reading the entire page. i looked at his "proof" and thought it was satire, but you seemed to express actual belief. My response was to that.