LiveWire Peer Support NetworkPrintable Version of Topic "The internet should be censored"
- LiveWire Teen Forums & College Forums (http://www.golivewire.com) |
|
Pages: 1 2 Next
-- Posted by Verite at 5:22 pm on May 14, 2008 The internet should be 100% censored for all images that have the potential to upset someone. Agree or disagree?
-- Posted by Ashtrey8 at 5:22 pm on May 14, 2008 There won't be anything left if that would happen.
-- Posted by Soren Kierkegaard at 5:23 pm on May 14, 2008 Where is the freedom to speech or the right to information beyond your bias?
-- Posted by EmbraceTheHate at 5:23 pm on May 14, 2008 It's impossible. What if I say your avatar is upsetting? Then it has to be censored. Anything can upset anyone. We'd end up with a blank screen.
-- Posted by silverrose42 at 5:23 pm on May 14, 2008 Honestly, if everything was censored, we'd be living in a communist-potential society.. and that would suck ass...
-- Posted by acausedelle at 5:24 pm on May 14, 2008 If everything was censored, then I couldn't say what I like saying the most.
-- Posted by Verite at 5:24 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Soren Kierkegaard at 5:23 pm on May 14, 2008
Not my bias.
-- Posted by Tony The Skittle at 5:25 pm on May 14, 2008
but what about the porn???
-- Posted by theglassflute at 5:25 pm on May 14, 2008 Nope. Anyone can be offended at anything. A picture of a gun is kind of offensive to me, and while a picture of two girls holding hands is not, that might offend someone else. You end up with a big fat load of nothing on the Internet. People have their own censors and should learn to ignore things they don't like, and get a grip. Sheltering themselves from "offensive" materials will not make them go away or disappear.
-- Posted by monkeydoodle77 at 5:26 pm on May 14, 2008 False. That would be stupid!
-- Posted by EmbraceTheHate at 5:26 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Verite at 8:24 pm on May 14, 2008
well that was a graphic picture, you must admit. It would have been better if there was a warning before it or if that was just a link. But it's just BAM in your face...
-- Posted by only in ky at 5:27 pm on May 14, 2008 Everything would be gone. Anything could upset anyone in any way.
-- Posted by Bittersweetoxox at 5:28 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Verite at 8:24 pm on May 14, 2008
There could have been a warning in the title...
-- Posted by Verite at 5:29 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Bittersweetoxox at 5:28 pm on May 14, 2008
There does not need to be warning labels on everything that are potentially offensive. Sorry. This isnt preschool
-- Posted by xxAshIsAFreakk at 5:30 pm on May 14, 2008 My god you're all tools. Everything should be censored to an extent because with total freedom, too much bullshit will happen. So get the fuck off your high horses and accept the fact you're wrong. Jesus fucking christ.
-- Posted by Tavis at 5:31 pm on May 14, 2008 False. Your opinion on upsetting isn't my opinion on upsetting.
-- Posted by Bittersweetoxox at 5:31 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Verite at 8:29 pm on May 14, 2008
I never said it was. But it's still a disturbing photo. I really don't see why it would be so difficult.
-- Posted by Time to pretend at 5:32 pm on May 14, 2008 nope i think that would be going to far. There would be lots of complaints and cases maybe. haha
-- Posted by MusicX at 5:33 pm on May 14, 2008 if u don't want to see the pics, don't look for them
-- Posted by xxAshIsAFreakk at 5:33 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Bittersweetoxox at 8:31 pm on May 14, 2008
Seriously. It's the same damn concept as accessibility ramps for people in wheelchairs. It's only common fucking curtosy you jackasses.
-- Posted by Ashtrey8 at 5:34 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from xXASHiSaFREAkK at 5:30 pm on May 14, 2008
"Just because your mum calls me a jackhammer doesn't mean you have to refer to me as a tool" Lol, that quote just jumped to my mind.
-- Posted by Verite at 5:36 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Tavis at 5:31 pm on May 14, 2008
Not my opinion.
-- Posted by Bittersweetoxox at 5:37 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Verite at 8:36 pm on May 14, 2008
He just wanted a damn warning. Seriously. This shit is getting fucking ridiculous.
-- Posted by Tavis at 5:38 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Verite at 8:36 pm on May 14, 2008
You sir, are stupid. You make a topic asking us, yet most likely just are looking ways to comeback to what he is saying. Imakethetest66 has nothing to do with this. I want to hear what you're saying to this, not him.
-- Posted by EmbraceTheHate at 5:43 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Verite at 8:29 pm on May 14, 2008
I disagree. There should probably be a warning on anything graphic.
-- Posted by Verite at 8:23 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from Fire37 at 5:43 pm on May 14, 2008
Considering the definition of graphic varies IMMENSELY...that is going to lead to a warning on everything.
-- Posted by iconoclast at 10:28 pm on May 14, 2008 Quote: from xXASHiSaFREAkK at 8:30 pm on May 14, 2008 why dont people just grow up and learn to take bullshit?
-- Posted by exceedinglyrare at 9:36 am on May 15, 2008 Disagree. Your privilege to not be offended < my right to speak my mind freely.
-- Posted by nikki at 10:45 am on May 15, 2008 No, if it offends you, you don't have to read it. Get over it already, we aren't in primary school.
-- Posted by Red Riding Hood at 5:20 pm on May 15, 2008 Disagree. |
Where is the freedom to speech or the right to information beyond your bias?
