-- Posted by Anonymous at 8:14 pm on May 21, 2008 how does the penis grow? can u do anything to make it grow faster? -- Posted by Latin Muscle at 8:17 pm on May 21, 2008 Did you know that if you can produce a psi ball that is in any way sensible or measurable, you can become a millionaire? James Randi offers a hefty chunk of change to anyone who can do things like that. It's weird that nobody has collected yet. -- Posted by im rockin the etnies at 8:20 pm on May 21, 2008 who the hell are you? anyways i can already do it -- Posted by abercrombie fitch at 8:22 pm on May 21, 2008 http://www.golivewire.com/forums/peer-tsbtis-support-a.html Not many points, but the best I can do. Hopefully you'll do it more to articulate your point of view, which you quite clearly have. I'd love to hear your structured argument, honestly. Give it a shot? -- Posted by Subbed In at 8:29 pm on May 21, 2008 I accept God as a "mere logical possibility."    God is, as well unjustifiable, (in fact, many religious people define God as being unjustifiable to those who do not believe already).   I'm merely curious as to how you would substantiate the claim that God does not exist without using Occam's razor in this way or something equivalent to Occam's razor. -- Posted by Ami17 at 8:29 pm on May 21, 2008 Quote: from Moridin at 8:30 am on Oct. 8, 2007 I love Chocolate =/= I hate vanilla Again, loving chocolate is not complimentary to hating vanilla.  Thus not(I love Chocolate) is not necessarily equal to (I hate vanilla).  Whereas in my object, being in the left half is, by definition, the same as not being in the right half.  There are no points in the shape that fall in neither half or both halves because I defined the two halves as complementary. -- Posted by Markusseven77 at 8:32 pm on May 21, 2008 Here you go with your "when in doubt, appeal to authority but tell everyone else not to" thing. Your "spinning globular bodies stay the same" is false, yes, given the definition of "spinning."  However, I never said that the sun wouldn't rise because the earth will stop spinning now.   There are lots of other ways in which the sun could not rise tomorrow.  For instance, the earth could stop turning the moment the sun is about to rise, or, indeed, the sun could cease to exist altogether. You are binding yourself by physics, and physics, though highly useful, are based on faith that Occam's razor absolutely provides explanations that are more likely to be correct. My argument is that the laws of physics might suddenly change tomorrow, or, indeed, that there might be some hidden hidden function that is defined to be 0 up until tomorrow but then suddenly becomes 12, which drastically effects all of the physical laws. Occam's razor would, of course, tell us not to believe in such a hidden function, but we accept Occam's razor based purely on faith (or "inductive reasoning," but in this case, as I've shown, we must use Occam's razor to justify itself which makes it a circular argument). -- Posted by girltripped at 8:37 pm on May 21, 2008 Fuckin please. More people have been killed in the name of god than for any other reason. Grow a brain. -- Posted by matto at 8:39 pm on May 21, 2008 Quote: from Forever Angel at 1:10 am on Oct. 7, 2007 Quote: from Moridin at 6:27 am on Oct. 6, 2007 Quote: from Loud Dog at 1:54 pm on Oct. 6, 2007 Quote: from Destinys Child at 5:43 pm on Oct. 5, 2007 Ah, gee, does the truth hurt that badly, Loud Dog? Truth? You called us lovely people and said we had great excuses.       Excuse me if I have a realistic sense of my own moral standing.     Yes, I am well aware that theft is a crime. However, as crimes go, it's one I could live with committing.    It is not a crime when you are returning to money to the people who the Churches stole from (false marketing). Your 'opinion' has no legal standing. Stealing IS a crime. That is just your opinion. You cannot play relativist with me.