-- Posted by DJ Josh at 3:59 pm on May 23, 2008 So alot of people don't have alot of posts, but they still have as many points as me. I believe the point system should be redone here, it seems to be buggy, and I believe that points should be like 90% influenced by posts. Anyone agree or am I over thinking this? -- Posted by stiicky iicky at 4:00 pm on May 23, 2008 You're over analyzing the situation. -- Posted by marshmellowman at 4:00 pm on May 23, 2008 No. I have plenty of reward points, and then lots of points from polls, as well as all my daily points. -- Posted by chunkymonkey at 4:00 pm on May 23, 2008 I say over thinking -- Posted by daniellamarie29 at 4:00 pm on May 23, 2008 I think it depends if you do other stuff more or post because that will effect the point number, if it counts more towards posts and you don't post a lot. -- Posted by iCanSeeYay at 4:01 pm on May 23, 2008 Some get their points when they refer a friend. That is the incentive of Refer A Friend. -- Posted by medjai at 4:02 pm on May 23, 2008 Points are not a big deal and they are extraordinarily easy to earn. I've given away over thirty thousand points and I'm still customizable. Post count is hardly an indicator of influence or seniority on this site, that little "Joined" tick in the bottom of each post is. -- Posted by hithere at 4:03 pm on May 23, 2008 what makes you think it's buggy -- Posted by bighead1991 at 4:06 pm on May 23, 2008 Points don't really matter, they don't do much. I pay more attention what I read and see of the way people act, not how big there e-peen is. -- Posted by DJ Josh at 4:06 pm on May 23, 2008 Quote: from hithere at 7:03 pm on May 23, 2008 what makes you think it's buggy That was a bad choice of words. Buggy as in Not Perfect. -- Posted by pleaseremove at 4:05 am on May 24, 2008 OK, what would you change?